medigraphic.com

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2022; 17 (1)

Counter-stories: a proposal based on narrative bioethics to counteract hate speech

Manchola-Castillo C

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 125.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose/Context. This article proposes counter-stories, based on narrative bioethics, as devices to counteract hate speech.
Methodology/Approach. Qualitative research based on a hermeneutical and reflective paradigm, divided into three methodological moments: review of narrative bioethics; hate speech analysis; establishment of a relationship between narrative bioethics and hate speech; proposition of counter-stories as antidotes to hate speech.
Results/Findings. Paradoxically, narrative bioethics and hate speech share an important characteristic: they are both aware of the power that stories embody for human beings; however, the two use those stories in diametrically opposite ways: while narrative bioethics defends dignity and social justice, hate speech attacks these two elements.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions. The third wave of narrative bioethics has the potential to counteract hate speech, through the creation of stories beyond stories, that defend dignity and social justice; for this, it is necessary to educate to prepare people who not only generate stories that persuade, but also are politicized and advocate for the dignity of other human beings.


REFERENCES

  1. Adams, Tony. 2008. “A review of narrative ethics.” Qualitative inquiry 14, no. 2:175-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304417

  2. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four essays. Texas: University ofTexas Press.

  3. Baldwin Clive. 2016. “Narrative Ethics.” En: Ten Have Henk, editor. Encyclopedia ofglobal bioethics. Amsterdam: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0

  4. Cebotarev, Eleonora. 2003. “El enfoque crítico: Una revisión de su historia, naturalezay algunas aplicaciones.” Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñezy Juventud 1, no. 1.

  5. Chambers, Tod. 1999. The Fiction of Bioethics. Nueva York: Routledge.

  6. Della Porta, Donatella y Michael Keating. 2013. Enfoques y Metodologías de las cienciassociales: Una perspectiva pluralista. Madrid: Ediciones AKAL.

  7. Domingo, Tomás y Lydia Feito. 2013. Bioética narrativa. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo.

  8. Fals-Borda, Orlando y Mohammed Rahman. 1989. La situación actual y las perspectivasde la IAP en el mundo. Análisis Político 5.

  9. Fals-Borda, Orlando. 2001. “Participatory (Action) Research in Social Theory: Originsand Challenges.” En: Reason, Peter y Bradbury, Hilary, editores. Handbookof Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Londres: Sage.

  10. Gagliardone, Iginio, Danit Gal, Thiago Alves y Gabriela Martinez. 2015. Counteringonline hate speech. Paris: Unesco.

  11. Manchola-Castillo, Camilo y Volnei Garrafa. 2019. “De la fundamentación a laintervención: una propuesta metodológica (¡narrativa!) para la Bioética deIntervención.” Revista Brasileira de Bioética 15, no. e6: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26512/rbb.v15.2019.26669

  12. Manchola-Castillo, Camilo y Jan Solbakk. 2017. “Bioethics and imagination:towards a narrative bioethics committed to social action and justice.” MedicalHumanities 43, no. 3: 166-171. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2016-011079

  13. Manchola-Castillo, Camilo. 2014. “Por una bioética distinta: narrativa y latinoamericana.”Revista Redbioética 5, no. 2: 70-80.

  14. Manchola-Castillo, Camilo. 2017. “Tres apuestas por una bioética práctica.” RevistaBioética 25, no. 2: 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422017252186

  15. Molano, Alfredo. 2015. “La gente no habla en conceptos, a menos que quieraesconderse.” En Moncayo, Victor, editor. Antología del pensamiento crítico colombiano.Buenos Aires: Clacso.

  16. Nussbaum, Martha. 1997. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghth8

  17. Potter, Van Rensselaer. 1971. Bioethics - Bridge to the future. Nueva Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  18. Ricoeur, Paul. 1984. Hermenéutica y psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Ediciones La Aurora.

  19. Unesco. 2005. Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos. París: Unesco.

  20. Unesco. 2019. United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/UN%20Strategy%20and%20Plan%20of%20Action%20on%20Hate%20Speech%2018%20June%20SYNOPSIS.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com