medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación

ISSN 1726-6718 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2021; 20 (3)

Videolaryngoscopy for airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic

Fernández MCE, Olvera GN, Fleitas GA, González CY
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 290.64 Kb.


Key words:

videolaryngoscopy, endotracheal intubation, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: At the end of 2019, cases of atypical pneumonia were reported in Wuhan caused by a new coronavirus. Endotracheal intubation may cause contamination of healthcare personnel. According to recent guidelines, videolaryngoscopy is preferred, because it increases the chances of intubation and avoids close contact with the patient.
Objectives: To describe airway management with videolaryngoscopy in patients with COVID-19 and to identify the main complications that appeared during endotracheal intubation.
Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out, in the period from December 2020 to February 2021, at the Naval Medical Center in Mexico City. The universe consisted of 178 patients with COVID-19 who required endotracheal intubation. A sample of 103 patients was taken, who were cared for by Cuban doctors.
Results: Patients older than 60 years represented 63.1% of the cases, while the male sex represented 65%. 42.1% had one predictor of difficult airway and 30.1% had two or more predictors. The glottis was visualized fully in 39.8% of cases and partially in 57.3%. Intubation on the first attempt was achieved in 73.8%. The main complications found were desaturation (33%) and arterial hypotension (37.9%).
Conclusions: Videolaryngoscopy could improve visualization of the glottic opening and endotracheal intubation on the first attempt. Desaturation and hypotension were complications that could be expected in COVID-19 patients during this procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Ojeda-González J. Consideraciones sobre la intubación de secuencia rápida como alternativa para el abordaje de la vía aérea en pacientes con COVID-19. Medisur. 2020[acceso: 15/06/2020];18(3):1-9. Disponible en: http://medisur.sld.cu/index.php/medisur/article/view/4693

  2. Abigail O. Países con más casos de coronavirus. Statista. 2021[acceso: 23/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/1091192/paises-afectados-por-el-coronavirus-de-wuhan-segun-los-casos-confirmados/

  3. Dwivedi. A comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus videolaryngoscopy using aerosol box for intubation in emergency surgeries during Covid-19 pandemic: A pilot study. 2020[acceso: 06/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.marinemedicalsociety.in/article.asp?issn=0975-3605;year=2020;volume=22;issue=3;spage=88;epage=92;aulast=Dwivedi

  4. Zeidan A, Bamadhaj M, Al-Faraidy M, Ali M. Videolaryngoscopy intubation in patients with COVID-19: How to Minimize Risk of Aerosolization? Anesthesiology. 2020;133(2):481-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003389

  5. Saito T, Taguchi A, Asai T. Videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19. Br J Anaesth. 2020[acceso: 06/02/2021];125(3):e284-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7287461/

  6. Cook K, El-Boghdadly B, McGuire A, McNarry A, Patel A. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID. Anaesthesia. 2020[acceso: 06/02/2021];75:785-99. Disponible en: https://www.armstrongmedical.net/app/uploads/2020/07/Consensus-guidelines-for-managing-the-airway-in-patients-with-COVID.pdf

  7. Liu A, O'Brien J, Choo E. COVID-19 intubation teams-the Saskatoon experience. Can J Anesth. 2021;68:591-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01897-w

  8. Suzuki K, Kusunoki S, Tanigawa K, Shime N. Comparison of three video laryngoscopes and direct laryngoscopy for emergency endotracheal intubation: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024927. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024927

  9. Jiang J, Kang N, Li B, Wu A-S, Xue F-S. Comparison of adverse events between video and direct laryngoscopes for tracheal intubations in emergency department and ICU patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2020;28(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-0702-7

  10. Artime AC, HAgberg CA. Airway management in the adult. In Gropper MA, Miller RD, Cohen NH, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, et al., editors. Miller's Anesthesia. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 1373-1412.

  11. Chaggar RS, Shah SV, Berry M, Saini R, Soni S, Vaugham D. The video Classification of intubation (VCI) score: a new description tool for tracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy. Eur J Anesthesiology. 2021;38(3):324-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001374

  12. Dullemond K, Renschler C, Trojanowski J, Scheuermeyer F, Stenstrom R, Griesdale D, et al. Success and complications of endotracheal intubation in critical care settings under COVID-19 protocols. Can J Emerg Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-020-00061-z

  13. Dite GS, Murphy NM, Allman R. An integrated clinical and genetic model for predicting risk of severe COVID-19: A population-based case-control study. PLoS ONE. 2021[acceso: 15/01/2021];16(2):16(2):e0247205. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592063/

  14. Anca PS, Toth PP, Kempler P, Rizzo M. Gender differences in the battle against COVID-19: Impact of genetics, comorbidities, inflammation and lifestyle on differences in outcomes. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e13666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13666

  15. Hu D, Lou X, Meng N, Li Z, Teng Y, Zou Y, et al. Influence of age and gender on the epidemic of COVID-19 Evidence from 177 countries and territories-an exploratory, ecological study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2021[acceso: 15/01/2021];1-10 Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7864622/

  16. Munayco C, Chowell G, Tariq A, Undurraga EA, Mizumoto K. Risk of death by age and gender from COVID-19 in Peru, March-May, 2020. AGING. 2020 [acceso: 15/01/2021];2(14):13869-81. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425445/

  17. Dávila Torres J, González Izquierdo J de J, Barrera Cruz A. Panorama de la obesidad en México. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2015[acceso: 06/02/2021];53(2):240-9. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=56578

  18. Pieters BMA, Maas EHA, Knape JTA, van Zundert A a. J. Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2017 [citado el 5 de febrero de 2021];72(12):1532-41. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28940354/

  19. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane Systematic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017[acceso: 02/02/2021];119(3):369-83. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28969318/

  20. García de Alencar JC, Marques B, Meirelle Marchini JF, Oliveira Marino L, Correa da Costa Ribeiro S, Gasparotto Bueno C. First-attempt intubation success and complications in patients with COVID-19 undergoing emergency intubation. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020[acceso: 15/01/2021];1(5):699-705. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32838394/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación. 2021;20