Gallardo LCA, Ascanio CA

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 41-48
PDF size: 221.52 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Evidence-based dentistry is a strategy that seeks to ensure that the daily clinical decisions made by the dental professional are based on scientific evidence. It integrates the clinical experience of the dentist, the needs and preferences of the patient, and the most current relevant clinical evidence. All three are part of the decision-making process for patient care. Evidence-based dentistry arises from the successful experiences obtained with the development and implementation of evidence-based medicine, applying the scientific method in the evaluation, planning and decision-making of health benefits, especially through controlled studies. In general, all dental practice has had great advances based on evidence, with proven true facts, but the fundamental concepts of occlusion have not had an improvement based on scientific knowledge, proof of this is that theories and concepts continue to be used. of the philosophies of occlusion in patient rehabilitation, we follow myths and sophisms that have not been demonstrated, in this review, we demonstrate the great advances in the concepts of occlusion and we know all dentists to break the paradigms of the old occlusion without scientific evidence.

REFERENCES

1. Guyat G. Preface. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D (eds.). User's guide to the medical literature. Essentials of evidenced medicine clinical practice. EE. UU.: AMA Press; 2002.

2. Guerra Romero L. La medicina basada en la evidencia: Un intento de acercar la ciencia al arte de la práctica clínica. Med Clin. 1996; 107 (10): 377-382.

3. Uribe ES. ¿Qué es la odontología basada en la evidencia? Rev Fac Odontol Valpso. 2000; 2 (4): 281-287.

4. Bonfill X, Gabriel R, Cabello J. La medicina basada en la evidencia. Rev Esp Cardiol. 1997; 50 (12): 819-825.

5. Ackerman JL, Ackerman MB, Kean MR. A Philadelphia fable: how ideal occlusion became the philosopher's stone of orthodontics. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77 (1): 192-194.

6. Michelotti A, Farella M, Steenks MH, Gallo LM, Palla S. No effect of experimental occlusal interferences on pressure pain thresholds of the masseter and temporalis muscles in healthy women. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006; 114 (2): 167-170.

7. Ono Y, Yamamoto T, Kubo KY, Onozuka M. Occlusion and brain function: mastication as a prevention of cognitive dysfunction. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37 (8): 624-640.

8. Firmani M, Becerra N, Sotomayor C, Flores G, Salinas JC. Oclusión terapéutica: desde las escuelas de oclusión a la Odontología Basada en Evidencia. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2013; 6 (2): 90-95.

9. Taylor TD, Wiens J, Carr A. Evidence-based considerations for removable prosthodontic and dental implant occlusion: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94: 555-560.

10. Manfredini D, Lombardo L, Siciliani G. Temporomandibular disorders and dental occlusion. A systematic review of association studies: end of an era? J Oral Rehabil. 2017; 44 (11): 908-923.

11. Tennant M. Impact of lateral occlusion schemes: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114 (2): 193-204.

12. Puerta Salazar GE, Herrera-Guardiola S, Martínez Cajas CH. Concordancia entre guía incisiva con patrones dentales, esqueléticos funcionales y del biotipo facial. Univ Odontol. 2016; 35 (74): 103-111.

13. Luca L, Manfredini D, Arveda N, Rossi L, Siciliani G. A cone-beam computerized tomography assessment of the relationship between upper incisors inclination and articular eminence features in orthodontically untreated patients with different facial type. J World Fed Orthod. 2016; 5 (2): 56-63.

14. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Centric relation: a historical and contemporary orthodontic perspective. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006; 137 (4): 494-501.

15. Lindauer SJ, Sabol G, Isaacson RJ, Davidovitch M. Condylar movement and mandibular rotation during jaw opening. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107 (6): 573-577.

16. Kandasamy S, Boeddinghaus R, Kruger E. Condylar position assessed by magnetic resonance imaging after various bite position registrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 144 (4): 512-517.

17. Mohl ND, Dixon DC. Current status of diagnostic procedures for temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125 (1): 56-64.

18. Petersson A. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. In: Manfredini D, editor. Current concepts on temporomandibular disorders. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence; 2010. pp. 207-222.

19. Cordray FE. Three-dimensional analysis of models articulated in the seated condylar position from a deprogrammed asymptomatic population: a prospective study. Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129 (5): 619-630.

20. Schmitt ME, Kulbersh R, Freeland T, Bever K, Pink FE. Reproducibility of the Roth power centric in determining centric relation. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 102-108.

21. Alexander L, Kulbersh R, Bonner P, Pink FE. Reproducibility of the condylar position indicator. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9: 96-101.

22. Jokstad A. Metodological challenges in the study of dental occlusion. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39 (7): 480-488.

23. Okeson JP. Tratamiento de oclusión y afecciones temporomandibulares. España: Elsevier; 2003.

24. Schuyler CH. The function and importance of incisal guidance in oral rehabilitation. 1963. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86 (3): 219-232.

25. Panek H, Matthews-Brzozowska T, Nowakowska D, Panek B, Bielicki G, Makacewicz S et al. Dynamic occlusions in natural permanent dentition. Quintessence Int. 2008; 39 (4): 337-342.

26. Türp JC, Greene CS, Strub JR. Dental occlusion: a critical reflection on past, present and future concepts. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35 (6): 446-453.

27. Clark JR, Evans RD. Functional occlusion: I a review. J Orthod. 2001; 28: 76-81.

28. Davies S, Gray R. What is occlusion? Brit Dent J. 2001; 191: 235-245.