medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2023, Number 1

<< Back

Simulación Clínica 2023; 5 (1)

What have you learned for your professional practice? Key topics of a simulation instructors training program

Leppink J, Losey-Pelayo C, Rojo-Santos E, Moral I, Maestre JM

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 38-46
PDF size: 223.29 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: although increasing numbers of centers are offering simulation instructors training activities, relatively little is known about whether completing such activities contributes to a change in participants of some kind, and it is important to collect such data in a structured manner for various reasons. Therefore, the aim of the study presented in this article was to study the experiences of participants in a specific simulation instructors training program and how this program contributes to the professional development of these participants. Material and methods: we used an immersive learning experience comprising an interactive online module of 15 days, 4 days presential online of 8 hours each and an individual online mentoring session. The methods included feedback between peers and mentors during and after practice, as well as interactive sessions and discussions. The data source consisted of brief written reflections at the end of each 8-hour presential online day. Results: the results were categorized using the learning themes formulated by Kolbe and Rudolph (2018): evaluations of sessions and tools, notes to oneself, metacognitions about one's own learning process, anticipations of applications of new skills in future, and emotions in the learning process. Moreover, a progression in professional development was identified that fits completely within these themes. Conclusion: this study contributes to the evidence of the stability of key themes in the experiences and professional development of participants in a simulation instructors training program.


REFERENCES

  1. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie MC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005; 27 (1): 10-28. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924

  2. Blackmore A, Kasfiki EV, Purva M. Simulation-based education to improve communication skills: A systematic review and identification of current best practice. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018; 4 (4): 159-164. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000220

  3. INACSL Standards Committee. Onward and upward: introducing the healthcare simulation standards of best practiceTM. Clin Sim Nurs. 2021; 58: 1-4. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.006

  4. Barber C, Van der Vleuten CPM, Leppink J, Chahine S. Social accountability frameworks and their implications for medical education and program evaluation: a narrative review. Acad Med. 2020; 95: 1945-1954. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003731

  5. Leppink J, Pérez-Fuster P. Establishing impact for accreditation and social accountability. Rev Lat Sim Clin. 2022; 4 (2): 112-114.

  6. Prideaux D. The global local tension in medical education: turning 'think global, act local' on its head? Med Educ. 2019; 53: 25-31. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13630

  7. Hospital virtual Valdecilla. Entrenamiento para instructores en simulación ofrecido por el Institute for Medical Simulation (IMS). (Visitado el 18 de septiembre de 2022): Disponible en: https://www.hvvaldecilla.es/entrenamiento-de-instructores-cursos-ifms

  8. Instructure Inc. Usted. El poder de la plataforma de gestión del aprendizaje Canvas. (Visitado el 18 de septiembre de 2022): Disponible en: https://www.instructure.com/es-es/canvas

  9. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013; 35: e1511-30. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632

  10. Maestre JM, Szyld D, Del Moral I, Ortiz G, Rudolph JW. La formación de expertos clínicos: la práctica reflexiva. Rev Clin Esp. 2014; 214: 216-220. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rce.2013.12.001

  11. Maestre JM, Rudolph JW. Teorías y estilos de debriefing: el método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud. Rev Esp Card. 2015; 68: 282-285. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018

  12. Diaz-Guio DA, Del Moral I, Maestre JM. ¿Queremos que los intensivistas sean competentes o excelentes? Aprendizaje para la maestría y simulación clínica. Acta Col Cuid Intens. 2015; 15: 187-195. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acci.2015.05.001

  13. Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE. 2020; 15: e0232076. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232076

  14. Formstack. Automate work, innovate faster. (Visited el 18 de September de 2022) Available in: https://www.formstack.com

  15. Leppink J, Paas F, Van der Vleuten CPM, Van Gog T, Van Merriënboer JJG. Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behav Res Met. 2013; 45: 1058-1072. Available in: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0334-1

  16. Kolbe M, Rudolph JW. What's the headline on your mind right now? How reflection guides simulation-based faculty development in a master class. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 20189; 4 (3): 126-132. Available in: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990199/

  17. Leppink J, Pérez-Fuster P. What is science without replication? Perspect Med Educ. 2016; 5: 320-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0307-z

  18. Picho K, Maggio L, Artino AR. Science: the low march of accumulating evidence. Med Educ. 2016; 5: 350-353. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0305-1

  19. Roussin CJ, Weinstock P. SimZones: an organizational innovation for simulation programs and centers. Acad Med. 2017; 92: 1114-1120. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001746

  20. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental debriefing": a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Sim Health. 2006; 1: 49-55. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006

  21. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Sim Health. 2014; 9: 339-349. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000047

  22. Roussin C, Larraz E, Jamieson K, Maestre JM. Psychological safety, self-efficacy, and speaking up in interprofessional healthcare simulation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018; 17: 38-46. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.12.002

  23. Manuel-Palazuelos JC, Riaño-Molleda M., Ruiz-Gómez JL, Martín-Parra JI, Redondo-Figuero C, Maestre JM. Learing curve patterns generated by a training method for laparoscopic small bowel anastomosis. Adv Simul. 2016; 1: 16. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0017-y

  24. Alam F, Boet S, Piquette D, Lai A, Perkes CP, LeBlanc VR. E-learning optimization: The relative and combined effects of mental practice and modeling on enhanced podcast-based learning – a randomized controlled trial. Adv Health Sci Educ Theor Pract. 2016; 21 (4): 789-802. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-016-9666-9

  25. Schaefer JJ 3rd, Vanderbilt AA, Cason CL, Bauman EB, Glavin RJ, Lee FW. Literature review: Instructional design and pedagogy science in healthcare simulation. Simul Health. Available in: 2011; (6): S30-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31822237b4

  26. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, Simon R. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Health. 2012; 7 (5): 288-294. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182620228

  27. Leppink J, Maestre JM, Rojo Santos E, Del Moral I. Simulación y práctica: una perspectiva de mediciones repetidas. Rev Esp Educ Méd. 2021; 2: 83-85. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.6018/edumed.487211




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com