medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Gaceta Médica de México

ISSN 0016-3813 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2003, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Gac Med Mex 2003; 139 (1)

Uterine and Rectosigmoid Perforation by Intrauterine Device. Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Juárez-Azpilcueta A, Romero-Hernández S, Motta-Martínez E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 73-75
PDF size: 56.16 Kb.


Key words:

Intrauterine device, complication, rectum sigmoid.

ABSTRACT

Uterine perforation secondary to placement of intrauterine devices is a rare complication that may affect contiguous organs such as bladder, small intestine, rectum, and sigmoid; all extremely serious depending on the organ involved. We report the case of a 22-year-old woman with complete uterines perforation due to intrauterine device affected that rectum sigmoid with asymptomatic presentation. We emphasize the postoperatory evolution and its management as well as a literature review


REFERENCES

  1. Clinton T, Kreutner AK. Gastrointestinal complications of modem intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1980;55:239-244.

  2. Grimaldo AJ, Herrera AA, García TA. Perforación de intestino grueso por un dispositivo intrauterino “medicado” tipo 7 de cobre. Gin Obs Mex 1993;61:235-237.

  3. Zakin D, Wilheim Z, Rossenblatt S. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embeding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanisms, incidence and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1987;36:335-353.

  4. Esposito JM, Zarou DM, Zarou GS. A dalkon shield imbedded in a myoma: case report of an unusual displacement of an intrauterine device. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;117:578.

  5. Mahran M, Karim M, El Maghoub S. Silent uterine perforation with Lippes loop and its management. Int Surg 1973;58:341.

  6. Fernández DR. Perforación uterina por dispositivo intrauterino. Comunicación de una indicación terapéutica excepcional. Anales ABC 1981;26:117-120.

  7. Heartwel SF, Schkesekman S. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 1983;1(6):31-36.

  8. Kably AA, Buganza CA, Altamirano MJ, et al. Perforación de recto-sigmoides por dispositivo intrauterino. Presentación de un caso y revisión de la literatura. Anales ABC 1993;38(2):61-63.

  9. Zakin D, Wilheim Z, Rossenblatt S, et al. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. II. Diagnostic methods, prevention and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1987;8(36):401-417.

  10. Ledger WJ, Wilson JR. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: the recognition and management of uterine perforations. Obstet Gynecol 1996;28: 806.

  11. Herrera LR. Laparoscopic removal of IUD from the abdomen. Br J Med 1976;2:596.

  12. Villablanca E, Drapkin C, Fernandez V. Intestinal obstruction by ectopic Lippes loop. Rev Chil Obstet 1999;34:372.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Gac Med Mex. 2003;139