medigraphic.com
Órgano de Difusión de la Asociación Académica Panamericana de Medicina Familiar A.C.

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Fam 2023; 25 (2)

Epidemiological Profile of Cervical Cancer Surviving Families

Robledo AOM, Romo RMR, Vargas DER, Galicia RL, Mayorga BCD

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 65-68
PDF size: 216.05 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the epidemiological profile of surviving families from cervical cancer. Methods: Families of patients with positive diagnose for cervical cancer from 2018 to 2021 were located. Families in which at least one of their members had a diagnosis of cervical cancer in a remission stage reported by histopathology were included in the study. Information about their socioeconomic level, their use of health services profile, the typology and family functionality, along with the stage of the family life cycle. Results: 80% (95% CI; 62.46 - 97.53) of the families were functional and 20% (95% CI; 2.46 - 37.53) moderately functional. The most frequent types of family were: nuclear and single parent, both represented 30% (95% CI; 9.91 - 50.08). Retirement and death 50% (95% CI; 28.08 - 71.91) was the predominant phase of the family life cycle, followed by the expansion phase which represented 30% (95% CI; 9.91 - 50.08). Conclusions: The results of this study reaffirm the importance of the family in coping with diseases that impact its members. “Family plasticity” was evidenced, which allows the family to continue being a functional unit even after facing a catastrophic disease such as cervical cancer.


REFERENCES

  1. Bhatla N, Aoki D, Sharma DN, Sankaranarayanan R. Cáncer decuello uterino: actualización FIGO 2021. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;155(S1):28–44.

  2. Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram,I., Jemal, A., & Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCANEstimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

  3. Wojtyla C, Janik-Koncewicz K, La Vecchia C. Cervical cancermortality in young adult European women. Eur J Cancer [Internet].2020;126:56–64. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.018

  4. INEGI. Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE). Indicadoresestratégicos del cuarto trimestre de 2020. Encuesta NacOcupación y Empl [Internet]. 2021; Available from: https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/enoe/15ymas/#Tabulados

  5. Galán-González EF, Gascón-Catalán AM. Correlation between familyfunctioning and healthy lifestyles in patients with colorectal cancer.Hacia la Promoc la Salud. 2021;26(2):147–60.

  6. Claudia DR, Claudia SO, Rodrigo CG, Erwin José PV. Caracterizaciónde los roles familiares y su impacto en las familias de México. RevCiencias Soc. 2021;27(ESPECIAL 3):128–38.

  7. Maria Lopes do Carmo M, Toledo de Mendonça E, Moura de OliveiraD, do Carmo Pinto Coelho Paiva A, Vitor Andrade J, Luiza RodriguesLins A. Impactos del cuidado de personas con cáncer en la vida delcuidador y la dinámica familiar. 2021;37(2):1–20. Available from:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3014-1504

  8. Delfín-Ruiz C, Cano-Guzmán R, Peña-Valencia EJ. Funcionalidadfamiliar como política de asistencia social en México. Rev Científicasy Humanísticas la Univ Zulia. 2020;26(2):1–6.

  9. Diagnóstico del Mercado Laboral del Estado Queretáro. SNE ServNac Empl [Internet]. 2020;1–35. Available from: from: https://www.observatoriolaboral.gob.mx/static/estudios-publicaciones/Morelos.pdf

  10. AMAI. Nivel Socioeconómico AMAI 2022 - Nota Metodológica. ComNiv Socioeconómico AMAI [Internet]. 2021;1–28. Available from:https://amai.org/descargas/Nota_Metodologico_NSE_2022_v5.pdf

  11. Lovo J. Síndrome de burnout: Un problema moderno. Revista entorno[revista en Internet] 2021 [acceso 4 de Abril de 2022] 70;110-120.Entorno [Internet]. 2021;110–20. Available from: https://www.lamjol.info/index.php/entorno/article/view/10371

  12. Gallego A, Pino J, Àlvarez M, Vargas E, Correa L. La dinámica familiary estilos de crianza: pilares fundamentales en la dimensión socioafectiva.Hallazgos [Internet]. 2019;16(32):131–50. Available from:https://revistas.usantotomas.edu.co/index.php/hallazgos/article/view/5093/pdf

  13. Valencia SM. Crisis familiares: una oportunidad para transitar de lacatástrofe y el caos, al despliegue de capacidades para el cambio.Diversitas. 2020;16(1):169–80.

  14. Ampudia Malpartida MK. Familia : enfoque y abordaje en la atenciónprimaria Family : focus and approach in primary care focus. RevMedica Sinerg [Internet]. 2020;5(9). Available from: https://revistamedicasinergia.com/index.php/rms/article/view/543/956

  15. López Peláez J, Aguirre-Loaiza H, Ortiz A, Caballo VE, Núñez C, LópezPeláez J, et al. Calidad de vida y estrategias de afrontamiento enpacientes con cáncer ginecológico. Suma Psicológica [Internet].2020;28(2):88–96. Available from: http://sumapsicologica.konradlorenz.edu.co/vol28-num-2-2021-calidad-de-vida-y-estrategias-de-afrontamiento-en-pacientes-con-cancer-ginecologico/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com