medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2023; 12 (2)

One-year survival after penetrating keratoplasty in the pediatric population

Verdiguel-Sotelo K, Pérez-González LB, Portillo-Sánchez ME

Language: Spanish
References: 40
Page: 97-105
PDF size: 262.94 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: penetrating keratoplasty in the pediatric population represents a great surgical. In Mexico the main indication is keratoconus and herpetic keratitis. Objective: to determine the one-year survival of penetrating keratoplasty in the pediatric population. Material and methods: records of patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty were reviewed, from July 2012 to July 2021. Type of study: observational, retrospective, cross-sectional and descriptive. It was carried out in the statistical program SPSS 20, using the statistical method of Kaplan and Meier. Results: total of 93 patients. Twenty-five patients were excluded to incomplete records. A total of 68 patients: 25 (37%) female and 43 (63%) male. Age group 53 (78%) in adolescents, more frequent; 11 (16%) schoolchildren; 2 (3%) minor infants; 1 (1.5%) older infant and 1 (1.5%) preschooler. Average age of 13.5 years. The main indication was keratoconus in 31 (45.59%), followed by leukoma in 19 (27.94%). Patients with ophthalmological comorbidity 32 (47%) patients. Patients with systemic comorbidities in 16 (24%) patients. In 42 (62%) patients had an improvement in visual acuity. Corneal graft survival at one year was 76% in 52 patients. Conclusions: in recent years, new care procedures have been designed and perfected, which have allowed increasing the survival of transplants in pediatric patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Zirm EK. Eine erfolgreiche totale Keratoplastik (a successful total keratoplasty). 1906. Refract Corneal Surg. 1989; 5 (4): 258-261.

  2. Velásquez-Monzón K, Navarro-Peña MC, Klunder-Klunder M, Tsatsos M, Ramírez-Ortiz MA. Pediatric penetrating keratoplasty and graft rejection: experience at the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2020; 77 (1): 23-27. English. doi: 10.24875/BMHIM.19000070.

  3. Karadag R, Chan TC, Azari AA et al. Survival of primary penetrating keratoplasty in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 171: 95-100.

  4. American Academy of Ophtalmology. Basic and Science Course. Section 7: External diseases and Cornea. 2019-2020. p. 200, p.479.

  5. Mukhtar S, Ambati BK. Pediatric keratoconus: a review of the literature. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38 (5): 2257-2266. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0699-8.

  6. Lowe MT, Keane MC, Coster DJ, Williams KA. The outcome of corneal transplantation in infants, children, and adolescents. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118 (3): 492-497. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.006.

  7. Stulting RD, Sumers KD, Cavanagh HD, Waring GO 3rd, Gammon JA. Penetrating keratoplasty in children. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91: 1222-1230.

  8. Di Zazzo A, Bonini S, Crugliano S, Fortunato M. The challenging management of pediatric corneal transplantation: an overview of surgical and clinical experiences. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017; 61 (3): 207-217. doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0510-4.

  9. Trief D, Marquezan MC, Rapuano CJ, Prescott CR. Pediatric corneal transplants. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2017; 28 (5): 477-484. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000393.

  10. Al-Torbak AA. Outcome of combined Ahmed glaucoma valve implant and penetrating keratoplasty in refractory congenital glaucoma with corneal opacity. Cornea. 2004; 23: 554-559.

  11. Rao KV, Fernandes M, Gangopadhyay N, et al. Outcome of penetrating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly. Cornea. 2008; 27: 749-753.

  12. AlArrayedh H, Collum L, Murphy CC. Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018; 102: 19-25.

  13. Low JR, Anshu A, Tan AC, Htoon HM, Tan DT. The outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in Singapore. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158 (3): 496-502. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.020.

  14. Sharma N, Prakash G, Titiyal JS, Tandon R, Vajpayee RB. Pediatric keratoplasty in India: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2007; 26: 810-813.

  15. Hwang DG, Hwang PH. Pediatric penetrating keratoplasty, seminars in ophthalmology, 1991; 6 (4): 212-218. doi: 10.3109/08820539109060201.

  16. Al-Ghamdi A, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD. Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome. J AAPOS. 2007; 11: 41-47.

  17. Muñoz-Ocampo M, Valderrama-Atayupanqui TY, Aguirre-Luna OM, Rodríguez-Almaraz M, Ramírez-Ortiz MA. Resultados visuales en pacientes pediátricos con trasplante de córnea: reporte de 10 años de experiencia. Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 2012; 69 (2): 91-96. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1665-11462012000200003&lng=es

  18. Patel HY, Ormonde S, Brookes NH et al. The indications and outcome of pediatric corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-2003. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89: 404-408.

  19. Dana MR, Moyes AL, Gomes JA et al. The indications for and outcome in pediatric keratoplasty. A multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 1995; 102: 1129-1138.

  20. Jaramillo-Cerezo A, Torres-Yepes V, Franco-Sánchez I et al. Etiología y consideraciones en salud de la discapacidad visual en la primera infancia: revisión del tema. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2021; 96 (1): 27-36.

  21. Nichal KK, Naor J, Jay V et al. Clinicopathological correlation of congenital corneal opacification using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86: 62-69.

  22. Rezende RA, Uchoa UB, Uchoa R, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR, Cohen EJ. Congenital corneal opacities in a cornea referral practice. Cornea. 2004; 23: 565-570.

  23. Vanathi M, Panda A, Vengayil S, Chaudhuri Z, Dada T. Pediatric keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54: 245-271.

  24. Dada T, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Indications for pediatric keratoplasty in India. Cornea. 1999; 18: 296-298.

  25. Sajjadi H, Javadi MA, Hemmati R, Mirdeghan A, Parvin M, Nassiri N. Results of penetrating keratoplasty in CHED. Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 1995; 14 (1): 18-25.

  26. Schaumberg DA, Moyes AL, Gomes JAP, Dana MR. Corneal transplantation in young children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127: 373-378.

  27. Javadi MA, Baradaran-Rafii AR, Zamani M et al. Penetrating keratoplasty in young children with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy. Cornea. 2003; 22: 420-423.

  28. American Academy of Ophtalmology. Basic and Science Course. Section 6: Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2019-2020. pp. 295-296.

  29. Bhandari R, Ferri S, Whittaker B, Liu M, Lazzaro DR. Peters anomaly: review of the literature. Cornea. 2011; 30 (8): 939-944.

  30. Shi W, Jin H, Li S, Liu M, Xie L. Indications of paediatric keratoplasty in north China. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007; 35 (8): 724-727.

  31. Lema I, Durán JA. Inflammatory molecules in the tears of patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112 (4): 654-549. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.11.050.

  32. Mackiewicz Z, Maatta M, Stenman M, Konttinen L, Tervo T, Konttinen YT. Collagenolytic proteinases in keratoconus. Cornea. 2006; 25 (5): 603-610. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000208820.32614.00. Erratum in: Cornea. 2006; 25 (6): 760.

  33. El Rami H, Chelala E, Dirani A et al. An update on the safety and efficacy of corneal collagen crosslinking in pediatric keratoconus. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015: 257927. doi: 10.1155/2015/257927.

  34. Who.int. 2021. Ceguera y discapacidad visual. [Internet] [Acceso 2 de Diciembre 2021] Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment.

  35. World Health Organization. (?2007)?. Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness: action plan 2006-2011. World Health Organization. Available in: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43754

  36. WHO Programme for the Prevention of Blindness. (1993). Management of low vision in children: report of a WHO consultation, Bangkok, 1992, 23-24.

  37. Centro Nacional de Trasplantes (2020). Estado Actual de Receptores, Donación y Trasplantes en México 2do Semestre 2020, México, corte al 03 de enero del 2021. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/606059/2doSemestre2020.pdf

  38. Centro Nacional de trasplantes (2021). Estado Actual de Receptores, Donación y Trasplantes en México 3er Trimestre 2021, México, corte al 03 de Octubre del 2021. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/674491/3erTrimestre2021.pdf

  39. García FF, Calderón BDI, Tlacuilo PJA. Trasplante corneal pediátrico. Rev Mex Oftalmol. 2008; 82 (1): 24-27.

  40. Muñoz-Ocampo M, Valderrama-Atayupanqui TY, Aguirre-Luna OM, Rodríguez-Almaraz M, Ramírez-Ortiz MA. Resultados visuales en pacientes pediátricos con trasplante de córnea: reporte de 10 años de experiencia. Bol Med Hosp Infant Méx. 2012; 69 (2): 91-96.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com