medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 07

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2023; 91 (07)

4-year experience with the use of readjustable tape for stress urinary incontinence

Gómez M, Echavarría LG, Gallego A, Castaño LC, Zambrano C, Henao C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 479-485
PDF size: 197.90 Kb.


Key words:

Stress urinary incontinence, Colombia, Middle aged, Urodynamicas, Quality of life, Laparotomy, Prolapse.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe the experience with the readjustable sling Remeex® in patients with recurrent stress urinary incontinence as a treatment alternative.
Materiala and Methods: Retrospective, observational, case series study carried out in a single center in the city of Medellin, Colombia, in patients attended at the Urogynaecology Unit of the Bolivarian University Clinic. Inclusion criteria: women over 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of recurrent urinary incontinence after one or more failed surgeries to correct urinary incontinence or with a diagnosis of intrinsic sphincter deficiency who underwent the readjustable sling procedure (Remeex Female Neomedic) between 2016 and 2019.
Results: Nineteen patients were evaluated with mean age 62 years (SD ± 9). The median follow-up was 19.4 months (RIQ 10-26.5). All patients had preoperative urodynamics that confirmed the diagnosis of stress urinary incontinence. All 19 patients had a diagnosis of moderate-severe-recurrent urinary incontinence, 4 with detrusor hypoactivity and 1 with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Of the 19 patients, 10 underwent surgery for correction of concomitant pelvic organ prolapse, which were distributed as follows: 6 patients with anterior or posterior colporrhaphy, 3 colpocleisis and 1 sacrocolpopexy by laparotomy.
Conclusions: The readjustable sling is a good option for women with previous anti-incontinence interventions with recurrence in whom improvement in the degree of incontinence in relation to the initial one was demonstrated, a benefit that was reflected in better quality of life.


REFERENCES

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, et al. Thestandardisation of terminology in lower urinary tractfunction: report from the standardisation sub-committeeof the International Continence Society. Urology 2003; 61 (1): 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02243-4

  2. Hu T-W, Wagner TH, Bentkover JD, Leblanc K, et al. Costs ofurinary incontinence and overactive bladder in the UnitedStates: a comparative study. Urology 2004; 63 (3): 461-5.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.037

  3. Liapis A. Burch Colposuspension and Tension-Free VaginalTape in the Management of Stress Urinary Incontinencein Women. Eur Urol 2002; 41 (4): 469-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00033-7

  4. Lapitan MCM, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubiccolposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7: CD002912. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7

  5. Errando-Smet C, Ruiz CG, Bertrán PA, Mavrich HV. A readjustablesling for female recurrent stress incontinenceand intrinsic sphincteric deficiency: Long-term results in 205patients using the Remeex sling system. Neurourol Urodyn2018; 37 (4): 1349-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23444

  6. Giberti C, Gallo F, Cortese P, Schenone M. The suburethraltension adjustable sling (REMEEX system) in the treatmentof female urinary incontinence due to ‘true’ intrinsicsphincter deficiency: results after 5 years of mean followup:suburethral tension adjustable sling in female incontinence.BJU International 2011; 108 (7): 1140-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09994.x

  7. Iglesias X, Espua M. Surgical treatment of urinary stressincontinence using a method for postoperative adjustmentof sling tension (Remeex System). Int Urogyn J Pelvic FloorDysfunction 2003; 14 (5): 326-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-003-1072-1

  8. Cortese P, Gallo F, Gastaldi E, Schenone M, et al. ReMeEx:The adjustable-tension suburetral sling in the treatmentof stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincterdysfunction (type III). Urologia 2009; 76: 104-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/039156030907600212

  9. Moreno Sierra J, Galante Romo I, Pérez Romero N, AlonsoPrieto MA, et al. Cabestrillo de tensión regulable REMEEXen el tratamiento de la incontinencia urinaria femenina:técnica quirúrgica personal. Arch Esp Urol 2006; 59: 793-97. https://doi.org/10.4321/s0004-06142006000800006

  10. Park BH, Kim JC, Kim HW, Kim YH, et al. Midterm Efficacyand Complications of Readjustable Midurethral Sling(Remeex System) in Female Stress Urinary IncontinenceWith Recurrence or Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency.Urology 2015; 85 (1): 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.003

  11. Seo MY, Noh JH. Long-term Outcome of the ReadjustableSling Procedure for Female Stress Urinary IncontinenceWith Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency or Recurrence. KoreanJournal of Urology 2014; 55 (2): 124. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.2.124

  12. Sandvik H, Seim A, Vanvik A, Hunskaar S. A severity indexfor epidemiological surveys of female urinary incontinence:comparison with 48-hour pad-weighing tests. NeurourolUrodyn 2000; 19 (2): 137-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(2000)19:2<137::aid-nau4>3.0.co;2-g

  13. Badia X., Schiaffino A., Alonso J., et-al. Using the EuroQol5-D in the Catalan general population: feasibility andconstruct validity. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 311-22. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024933913698

  14. Chung JW, Yoo ES. Efficacy and safety of a readjustablemidurethral sling (Remeex system) for stress urinaryincontinence with female voiding dysfunction. InvestigClin Urol 2017; 58 (2): 127-33. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2017.58.2.127

  15. Plata M, Robledo D, Bravo-Balado A, Castaño JC, et al. Effectivenessof the Remeex system™ in Colombian women withrecurrent stress urinary incontinence or intrinsic sphincterdeficiency. Int Urogynecol J 2018; 29 (9): 1371-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3568-8

  16. Kim WB, Lee SW, Lee KW, Kim JM, et al. Readjustable midurethralsling (REMEEX system) in obese women. InvestigClin Urol 2019; 60 (6): 488-95. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.2019.60.6.488

  17. Kim A, Kim S, Kim HG. Current Overview of SurgicalOptions for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence. Int NeurourolJ 2020; 24 (3): 222-30. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2040052.026

  18. Kwon J, Kim Y, Kim DY. Second-Line Surgical ManagementAfter Midurethral Sling Failure. Int Neurourol J 2021; 25(2): 111-118. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2040278.139

  19. Cho KJ, Kim JC. Management of Urinary Incontinence WithUnderactive Bladder: A Review. Int Neurourol J 2020; 24(2): 111-117. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2040076.038

  20. Kowalik CG, Dmochowski RR, De EJB. Surgery for femaleSUI: The ICI algorithm. Neurourol Urodyn 2019; 38 Suppl4: S21-S27. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23879




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2023;91