Parra CJA, Alarcón LMF, Carrera BIA

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 190-196
PDF size: 355.99 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the marginal and internal adaptation of our restorations manufactured by casting, milling systems and laser sintering is one of the most important clinical factors for the success of fixed prostheses, preventing the risk of microleakage and periodontal disease. Objective: evaluate the marginal and internal adaptation of metal copings in Cr-Co alloy made by conventional techniques, CAD/CAM milling and laser sintering. Material and methods: an experimental, comparative and in vitro study, a Cr-Co master model was printed from the scan of a premolar prepared for a full crown. An experimental, comparative and in vitro study, a Cr-Co master model was printed from the scan of a premolar prepared for a full crown, on which 30 caps divided into three groups were designed; the first group corresponds to the cast copings milled on a wax disc A (A = 10), the second group milled copings on a presintered metal disc B (B = 10) and the third group printed by laser sintering copings C (C = 10). The silicone replica was used, placing silicone inside each coping, on the master model, simulating cement, using a universal testing machine, a 50 N compression was performed. After removing each coping, they were filled with heavy addition silicone, obtaining a silicone replica. Two cross-sections were made in the buccolingual and mesiodistal direction., observing the thickness of the VPS (vinyl polyeter silicone) silicone using a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ745T), obtaining values in micrometers. For the statistical analysis, the SPSS 25 software was used in order to perform the normality and two-way ANOVA tests under a 95% confidence level. Results: the smallest gap was obtained by the milled group, followed by the printed ones and finally those cast by conventional methods. Two-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the three groups (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: the gap was found to vary with each fabrication method, the conventional casting technique showed a larger gap, none exceeding the clinically acceptable range.

REFERENCES

1. Taggart WH. Apparatus for making molds for the casting of dental fillings and the like. United States: Patent Office; 1907.

2. Roberts HW, Berzins DW, Moore BK, Charlton DG. Metal-ceramic alloys in dentistry: a review. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18 (2): 188-194.

3. Shillingburg HT Jr. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago, IL.: Quintessence; 2012. pp. 131-149.

4. Romeo Rubio M, Vallejo Pintado J, Martínez Vázquez de Parga JA, del Río Highsmith J, López-Quiles Martínez J, Rivero González MA et al. Tecnología CAD/CAM en implantoprótesis. Puesta al día y perspectivas de futuro. Gaceta dental: Industria y profesiones. 2010; 216: 124-143.

5. Persson A, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95 (3): 194-200.

6. Wu L, Zhu H, Gai X, Wang Y. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium dental alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent. 2014; 111 (1): 51-55.

7. Syu JZ, Byrne G, Laub LW, Land MF. Influence of finish-line geometry on the fit of crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 1993; 6 (1): 25-30.

8. Knoernschild KL, Campbell SD. Periodontal tissue responses after insertion of artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 84 (5): 492-498.

9. Richter WA, Ueno H. Relationship of crown margin placement to gingival inflammation. J Prosthet Dent. 1973; 30 (2): 156-161.

10. Mezzomo E. Rehabilitación oral contemporánea. Latinoamericana AMO, editor. Sao Paulo: Actualidades Médico Odontológicas Latinoamericana; 2010.

11. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62 (4): 405-408.

12. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci. 2008; 116 (3): 272-279.

13. Pegorao LF. Prótesis fija. Sao Paulo: Artes Médicas Latinoamérica; 2001.

14. Falk A, Vult von Steyern P, Fransson H, Thorén MM. Reliability of the impression replica technique. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28 (2): 179-180.

15. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns--validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35 (2): 116-122.

16. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971; 131 (3): 107-111.

17. Ishikiriama A, Oliveira Jde F, Vieira DF, Mondelli J. Influence of some factors on the fit of cemented crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1981; 45 (4): 400-404.

18. Dimashkieh MR, Davies EH, von Fraunhofer JA. Measurement of the cement film thickness beneath full crown restorations. Br Dent J. 1974; 137 (7): 281-284.

19. Hembree JH Jr, George TA, Hembree ME. Film thickness of cements beneath complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1978; 39 (5): 533-535.

20. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011; 27 (4): 356-363.

21. Nesse H, Ulstein DM, Vaage MM, Oilo M. Internal and marginal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses fabricated with 3 different techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 114 (5): 686-692.

22. Park JK, Lee WS, Kim HY, Kim WC, Kim JH. Accuracy evaluation of metal copings fabricated by computer-aided milling and direct metal laser sintering systems. J Adv Prosthodont. 2015; 7 (2): 122-128.