medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2023; 80 (4)

Non carious cervical lesions: a systematic review.

Calvo GJM, Ríos RFI

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 209-213
PDF size: 155.98 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) are a group of lesions that affect the cervical area of the dental organ causing dentin hypersensitivity and cosmetic defects. Objective: to know, through a systematic review, the current state of non-carious cervical lesions. Material and methods: a search was conducted in the PubMed database, using the keywords: non-carious cervical lesions OR noncarious cervical lesions OR tooth wear OR tooth erosion OR dental abfraction OR abfraction, compiling a total of 78 articles. Results: determining etiology is necessary before selecting treatment strategies for non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL). Know the different types of tissues that make up the dentary organ, facilitate the understanding of the factors involved in the development of non-carious al cervical lesions. This allows treatment to focus more on the cause of the problem than on symptoms. With this we can modify various factors in an interceptive way, laser therapy treatments and topical compounds, are a minimally invasive strategy. Conclusions: the best way to describe non-carious al cervical lesions would be as a multifactorial disease to which special attention should be paid to both diagnostic methods, identifying cofactors that promote the progression of injury, such as friction and biocorrosion. This review provides data that associates occlusal factors as one of the main causes of a disease that affects more than half of the adult population.


REFERENCES

  1. Teixeira DNR, Thomas RZ, Soares PV, Cune MS, Gresnigt MMM, Slot DE. Prevalence of nonserious cervical lesions among adults: A systematic review. J Dent. 2020; 95: 103285.

  2. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012; 24 (1): 10-23.

  3. Senna P, Del Bel Cury A, Rosing C. Non-carious cervical lesions and occlusion: A systematic review of clinical studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2012; 39: 450-462.

  4. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 14-19.

  5. Rees JS. The biomechanics of abfraction. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006; 220 (1): 69-80.

  6. Warreth A, Abuhijleh E, Almaghribi MA, Mahwal G, Ashawish A. Tooth surface loss: A review of literature. Saudi Dent J. 2020; 32 (2): 53-60.

  7. Sabrah AH, Turssi CP, Lippert F, Eckert GJ, Kelly AB, Hara AT. 3D-Image analysis of the impact of toothpaste abrasivity on the progression of simulated non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2018; 73:14-18.

  8. Pereira FA, Zeola LF, de Almeida Milito G, Reis BR, Pereira RD, Soares PV. Restorative material and loading type in uence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20: 433-441.

  9. Soares PV, Souza LV, Veríssimo C, Zeola LF, Pereira AG, Santos-Filho PCet al. Effect of root morphology on biomechanical behaviour of premolars associated with abfraction lesions and different loading types. J Oral Rehabil. 2014; 41 (2): 108-114.

  10. Levitch L, Bader DA, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Noncarious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2014; 22: 195-207.

  11. Lehman ML, Meyer ML. Relationship of dental caries and stress: concentrations in teeth as revealed by photoelastic tests. J Dent Res. 1966; 45 (6): 1706-1714.

  12. Du JK, Wu JH, Chen PH, Ho PS, Chen KK. Influence of cavity depth and restoration of non-carious cervical root lesions on strain distribution from various loading sites. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20 (1): 98.

  13. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth. A finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66 (4): 451-459.

  14. Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135: 1109-1118.

  15. Dawes C. What is the critical pH and why does a tooth dissolve in acid? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003; 69 (11): 722-724.

  16. Bartlett D. Etiology and prevention of acid erosion. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2009; 30 (9): 616-620.

  17. Terry DA. Cervical dentin hypersensitivity: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Dent Today. 2011; 30 (4): 61-62, 64, 68 passim; quiz 70.

  18. Chun K, Choi H, Lee J. Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J Dent Biomech. 2014; 5: 1758736014520809.

  19. Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 2002; 47 (4): 281-291.

  20. Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003; 14 (1): 13-29.

  21. Prati C. What is the clinical relevance of in vitro dentine permeability test? J Dent. 1992; 222: 83-88.

  22. Thaler A, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Pelka M. Influence of tooth age and root section on root dentine dye penetration. Int Endod J. 2008; 41: 1115-1122.

  23. Katchburian E, Arana-Chávez VE. Histología e embriología oral. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan-Panamericana; 2012.

  24. Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 18: 478-481.

  25. Bosshardt DD, Stadlinger B, Terheyden H. Cell-to-cell communication--periodontal regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26 (3): 229-239.

  26. Kaku M, Yamauchi M. Mechano-regulation of collagen biosynthesis in periodontal ligament. J Prosthodont Res. 2014; 58: 193-207.

  27. Zucchelli G, Gori G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M et al. Non-carious cervical lesions associated with gingival recessions: a decision-making process. J Periodontol. 2011; 82 (12): 1713-1724.

  28. Mitic AD, Gasic JZ, Barac RG, Radenkovic GS, Sunaric SM, Popovic JZ et al. Ultrastructural changes in the cemento-enamel junction caused by acidic beverages: An in vitro study. Microsc Res Tech. 2020; 83 (2): 91-98.

  29. Hur B, Kim HC, Park JK, Versluis A. Characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions An ex vivo study using micro computed tomography. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38: 469-474.

  30. Miller N, Penaud J, Ambrosini P, Bisson-Boutelliez C, Briancon S. Analysis of etiologic factors and periodontal conditions involved with 309 abfractions. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30: 828-832.

  31. Michael JA, Kaidonis JA, Townsend GC. Non-carious cervical lesions on permanent anterior teeth: A new morphological classification. Aust Dent J. 2010; 55: 134-137.

  32. López-Frías FJ, Castellanos-Cosano L, Martín-González J, Llamas-Carreras JM, Segura-Egea JJ. Clinical measurement of tooth wear: Tooth wear indices. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012; 4 (1): e48-e53.

  33. Estafan A, Furnari PC, Goldstein G, Hittelman EL. In vivo correlation of nonserious cervical lesions and occlusal wear. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 221-226.

  34. Palamara D, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Pintado M, Messer HH. Effect of stress on acid dissolution of enamel. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 109-115.

  35. Sneed WD. Noncarious cervical lesions: why on the facial? A theory. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011; 23 (4): 197-200.

  36. Spranger H. Investigation into the genesis of angular lesions at the cervical region of teeth. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26: 149-154.

  37. Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: a scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 340425.

  38. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31 (2): 117-123.

  39. Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Soares CJ, Faria VL, Naves MF, Michael JA et al. Non-carious cervical lesions: influence of morphology and load type on biomechanical behaviour of maxillary incisors. Aust Dent J. 2013; 58 (3): 306-314.

  40. Kerstein RB. Disocclusion time-reduction therapy with immediate complete anterior guidance development to treat chronic myofascial pain-dysfunction syndrome. Quintessence Int. 1992; 23: 735-747.

  41. Piper, M. Temporomandibular Joint Imaging. Handbook of Research on Clinical Applications of Computerized Occlusal Analysis in Dental Medicine. 2022, Vol. 2 Chapter 9. Hershey.

  42. Badavannavar AN, Ajari S, Nayak KUS, Khijmatgar S. Abfraction: Etiopathogenesis, clinical aspect, and diagnostic-treatment modalities: A review. Indian J Dent Res. 2020; 31 (2): 305-311.

  43. Coleman TA, Grippo JO, Kinderknecht KE. Cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Part II: Associations with abfractive lesions. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31: 466-473.

  44. Davari AR, Ataei E, Assarzadeh H. Dentin hypersensitivity: Etiology, diagnosis and treatment; A literature review. J Dent (Shiraz). 2013; 14 (3): 136-145.

  45. Talesara K, Kulloli A, Shetty S, Kathariya R. Evaluation of potassium binoxalate gel and Nd:YAG laser in the management of dentinal hypersensitivity: a split-mouth clinical and ESEM study. Lasers Med Sci. 2014; 29 (1): 61-68.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com