Salgado MY, Villanueva ARE, Molina FN, González RM, García LS

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 220-227
PDF size: 392.80 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the bone is in constant remodeling to maintain the skeletal structure, having a cycle of resorption by osteoclasts and formation of new bone by osteoblasts, the bone is also susceptible to systemic diseases, trauma, age and genetic disorders that affect bone remodeling, producing a massive loss of bone mass regulated by hormones, cytokines, enzymes, etcetera. The objective is to perform a systematic review of articles that show a change or alteration when using micro-vibration and pharmacological treatments on cathepsin K in the alveolar bone. Material and methods: in order to make a comparison between the effectiveness of micro-vibration and cathepsin K inhibitor treatments, a systemic review was carried out in nine databases (Wiley Online Library, PubMed, Google Academic, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SciELO, Medline, EBSCO and Springer Link). The study population was rats and mice. Results: this study included 20 articles whose research was carried out in clinical studies. In the results we can see how all the treatments in some way improve the bone remodeling process, it is difficult to compare which treatment within each group is better than the other, because the results expressed are qualitative. Conclusion: according to the results expressed, it is decided that it is better to perform a treatment with micro vibrations because the use of cathepsin K inhibitors are not yet fully developed and their consequences are not understood due to their systemic way of acting.

REFERENCES

1. Novak D, Teitelbaum S. The osteoclast: friend or foe? Ann Rev Pathol. 2008; 3 (1): 457-484. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.3.121806.151431.

2. Gómez-de-Ferraris M. Capítulo 12; periodoncio de inserción. En: Gómez de Ferraris ME, Campos MA. Histología, embriología e ingeniería tisular bucodental. México: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2019. pp. 368-383.

3. Lindhe J, Lang NP (dir.). Periodontología clínica e implantología odontológica. 6a ed. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2017. 2 vol. Disponible en: https://www.medicapanamericana.com/VisorEbookV2/Ebook/9789500695275#{%22Pagina%22:%22TA PA%22,%22Vista%22:%22Indice%22,%22Busqueda%22:%22%22}

4. Pardos-Mainer E, Calero Morales S, Sagarra L. Efectos de las plataformas vibratorias en la salud ósea en mujeres posmenopáusicas. Rev Cuba Obstet Ginecol. 2019; 45 (1): 118-136.

5. Aristizábal JF. Ortodoncia acelerada y ortodoncia de transito expreso (OTE)®, un concepto contemporáneo de alta eficiencia. CES Odontol. 2014; 27 (1): 56-73.

6. Kafienah W, Bromine D, Buttle D, Croucher L, Hollander A. Human cathepsin K cleaves native type I and II collagens at the N-terminal end of the triple helix. Biochem J. 1998; 33 (3): 727-732. doi: 10.1042/bj3310727.

7. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

8. Da Costa Santos C, de Mattos Pimenta C, Nobre M. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2007; 15 (3): 508-511. doi: 10.1590/s0104-11692007000300023.

9. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17 (1): 1-12. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4.

10. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. 2021. Available in: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

11. McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods. 2021; 12 (1): 55-61. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1411.

12. Suzuki N, Takimoto K, Kawashima N. Cathepsin K Inhibitor regulates inflammation and bone destruction in experimentally induced rat periapical lesions. J Endod. 2015; 41 (9): 1474-1479. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.04.013.

13. Yoshioka Y, Yamachika E, Nakanishi M, Ninomiya T, Nakatsuji K, Kobayashi Y et al. Cathepsin K inhibitor causes changes in crystallinity and crystal structure of newly-formed mandibular bone in rats. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 56 (8): 732-738. doi: doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2018.08.003.

14. Araújo AA, de Varela H, Brito GA, Medeiros CA, Araújo L, do Nascimento JHO et al. Azilsartan increases levels of IL-10, down-regulates MMP-2, MMP-9, RANKL/RANK, cathepsin K and up-regulates OPG in an experimental periodontitis model. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (5): e96750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096750.

15. Yamaguchi M, Hayashi M, Fujita S, Yoshida T, Utsunomiya T, Yamamoto H et al. Low-energy laser irradiation facilitates the velocity of tooth movement and the expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-9, cathepsin K, and alpha(v) beta(3) integrin in rats. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32 (2): 131-139. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp078.

16. García-López S, Villanueva RE, Massó-Rojas F, Páez-Arenas A, Meikle MC. Micro-vibrations at 30 Hz on bone cells cultivated in vitro produce soluble factors for osteoclast inhibition and osteoblast activity. Arch Oral Biol. 2020; 110: 104594. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2019.104594.

17. Higashi Y, Inami K, Shimizu H, Matsumoto N. Effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on osteoclast differentiation. Orthod Waves. 2020; 74 (4): 163-169. doi: 10.1080/13440241.2020.1843354.

18. Zhao Q, Wang X, Liu Y, He A, Jia R. NFATc1: Functions in osteoclasts. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010; 42 (5): 576-579. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.12.018.