medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 47

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2023; 12 (47)

Attitudes and perceptions of dental students about distance education

Castro-Rodrígueza Y
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 33-44
PDF size: 489.26 Kb.


Key words:

Learning, education, distance, dentistry, attitude.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Distance education has been instituted in multiple universities due to the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and it is debated whether it presents positive impacts in the field of Dentistry.
Objective: To identify the attitudes and perceptions of dental students about distance education.
Method: Cross-sectional comparative study that included students of the Faculty of Dentistry at the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (Lima, Peru). A scale of attitudes toward learning, a personal data questionnaire, and open questions was used. The scale data were presented as relative frequencies according to global response and average scores. These data were compared with the characteristics of the students.
Results: 216 students were surveyed, and 120 (55.6 %) were female. 34.7% (n = 75) disagreed that distance education is more effective than face-to-face learning, and 24.5% (n = 53) agreed. Males were more satisfied with distance education (3.91 ± 1.02); scores for this satisfaction were higher for first and second-year students as well as for those taking theoretical subjects (3.94 ± 1.12). Students who received theoretical, practical, and clinical subjects evidenced low scores concerning the question “I think I have not learned well with distance education” (3.01 ± 0.12).
Conclusions: The majority of dental students at a Peruvian public university present attitude of disagreement regarding the effectiveness of distance education over face-to-face education, mainly by students in higher years and those who have taken theoretical-practical and clinical subjects. The majority of students do recommend the use of the distance education model to take theoretical subjects that do not require practical sessions where psychomotor skills are developed and where one subject per day is taken.


REFERENCES

  1. Fauzi MA. E-learning in higher education institutionsduring COVID-19 pandemic: current and future trendsthrough bibliometric analysis. Heliyon. 2022;8(5):e09433.doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09433.

  2. Grimes EB. Use of distance education in dental hygiene programs.J Dent Educ. 2002;66(10):1136-45. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12449207/

  3. Ahmady S, Kallestrup P, Sadoughi MM, Katibeh M, KalantarionM, Amini M, Khajeali N. Distance learning strategiesin medical education during COVID-19: A systematicreview. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:421. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_318_21

  4. Cravener PA. Faculty experiences with providing onlinecourses: thorns among the roses. Comput Nurs 1999;17:42-7.https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9988966/

  5. Lettus M. Distance education: is it right for you? Imprint1999;46:39-41.

  6. Wijesooriya NR, Mishra V, Brand PLP, Rubin BK. COVID-19 and telehealth, education, and research adaptations.Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;35:38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.06.009

  7. McCutcheon LRM, Alzghari SK, Lee YR, Long WG, MarquezR. Interprofessional education and distance education:A review and appraisal of the current literature.Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017;9(4):729-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.03.011.

  8. English T, Harrison AL, Hart AL. A distance learningmodel in a physical therapy curriculum. J Allied Health1998;27:228-32. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9879030/

  9. Co M, Cheung KYC, Cheung WS, Fok HM, Fong KH, KwokOY, et al. Distance education for anatomy and surgical training- A systematic review. Surgeon. 2022;20(5):e195-e205.doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.08.001.

  10. Grimes EB. Effectiveness of an online course in dental terminology.J Dent Educ. 2001;65:242-7.

  11. Olmstead JL. Longitudinal analysis of student performancebetween host and cooperating college learners in thedental hygiene program at Northcentral Technical Collegein Wausau, Wisconsin. Dissertation/Theses, University ofWisconsin-Stout. 2001.

  12. McCutcheon K, Lohan M, Traynor M, Martin D. A systematicreview evaluating the impact of online or blendedlearning vs. face-to-face learning of clinical skills in undergraduatenurse education. J Adv Nurs. 2015;71(2):255-70.doi: 10.1111/jan.12509.

  13. Carr S. Is anyone making money on distance education? collegesstruggle to figure out how much they are spending ononline programs. Chron of High Ed. 2001;47:41-3. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ623434

  14. Brent BO. Is distance education a cost-effective alternative totraditional classroom instruction? Sch Bus Aff. 2001;67:33-9.

  15. Suner YY, Piskin B. Mobile learning in dentistry: usagehabits, attitudes and perceptions of undergraduate students.PEERJ. 2019;7:e7391. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7391

  16. Çelik A. M-learning attitude scale: validity and reliabilityanalyses. J Res Educ Teach. 2013;2:172-85.

  17. Sheppard L, Mackintosh S. Technology in education: whatis appropriate for rural and remote allied health professionals?Aust J Rural Health. 1998;6:189-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1584.1998.tb00311.x

  18. Sarialioglu GA, Sesen UY, Donmez N. Perceptions of dentalstudents towards online education during the COVID-19pandemic. Eur Oral Res. 2021;55(3):124-32. doi: 10.26650/eor.2021869185.

  19. Deery C. The COVID-19 pandemic: implications for dentaleducation. Evid Based Dent. 2020;21:46-7. doi: 10.1038/s41432-020-0089-3

  20. Teo T, Luan W, Thammetar T, Chattiwat W. Assessing elearningacceptance by university students in Thailand.Australas J Educ Technol. 2011;27(8):1356-68. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.898

  21. Quinn B, Field J, Gorter R, Akota I, Manzanares MC, PaganelliC, et al. COVID-19: The immediate response of europeanacademic dental institutions and future implicationsfor dental education. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;24:811-4. doi:10.1111/eje.12542.

  22. Jordan J, Jalali A, Clarke S, Dyne P, Spector T, Coates W.Asynchronous vs didactic education: it’s too early to throwin the towel on tradition. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:105. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-105.

  23. Schlenz MA, Schmidt A, Wostmann B, Kramer N, Schulz-Weidner N. Students’ and lecturers’ perspective on the implementationof online learning in dental education due toSARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): a cross-sectional study. BMCMed Educ. 2020;20(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02266-3

  24. Wang K, Zhang L, Ye L. A nationwide survey of onlineteaching strategies in dental education in China. J DentEduc. 2021;85(2):128- 34. doi: 10.1002/jdd.12413

  25. Lo HC. Utilizing Computer-mediated CommunicationTools for Problem-based Learning. Educ Technol Soc.2009;12:205-13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.1.205

  26. Pontual MLA, do Nascimento EHL, da Cruz Perez DE,Pontual AA, Ramos-Perez FM. Challenges in oral radiologyteaching during COVID-19 pandemic. DentomaxillofacRadiol. 2020;49(5):20200178. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200178

  27. Machado RA, Bonan PRF, Perez D, Martelli JH. COVID-19pandemic and the impact on dental education: discussingcurrent and future perspectives. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e083. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0083.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2023;12