medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2023, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2023; 5 (2)

Telesimulation for the training of midwifery and childcare students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Observational study

Tapia-Wittcke M, Ramírez-Méndez A, Vasquez-Yáñez J

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 52-59
PDF size: 262.59 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has directly impacted the higher education system, especially in the development of teaching-learning strategies used for the clinical training of university students, this has forced higher education institutions to make new and rapid adjustments, which is why telesimulation has become an effective strategy to provide successful educational experiences, in an interactive and meaningful environment, even with limited physical resources. Objective: to describe the experience and level of satisfaction in the training of students of the Obstetrics and Childcare career through telesimulation in times of COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: cross-sectional study, the study sample corresponded to 109 students, for data collection a validated survey was used, self-applied, through Microsoft Forms and the processing and analysis of the results was carried out through the SPSS statistical program. Results: 100% of the respondents had experience with telesimulation, with simulated patient and/or virtual simulator, and most of the participants (79.81%) showed a high level of satisfaction. Conclusions: the experience in telesimulation is perceived positively by students in their teaching and learning process during their university education.


REFERENCES

  1. Palomer L, López R. Educación universitaria, formando profesionales y personas. FEM (Ed. impresa) [Internet]. 2016; 19 (6): 281-285. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2014-98322016000600003&lng=es

  2. Mantilla G, Ariza K, Santamaria A, Moreno S. Educación médica basada en competencias: Revisión de enfoque. Univ Med [Internet]. 2021; 62 (2). Disponible en: https://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/vnimedica/article/view/32073

  3. Lozano-Díaz A, Fernández-Prados JS, Figueredo Canosa V, Martínez Martínez AM. Impactos del confinamiento por el COVID-19 entre universitarios: Satisfacción Vital, Resiliencia y Capital Social Online. RISE [Internet]. 2020; 79-104. Disponible: https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/rise/article/view/5925

  4. Díaz-Guio DA, Arias-Botero JH, Álvarez C, et al. Telesimulación en la formación en medicina perioperatoria desde la perspectiva colombiana. Simulación Clínica. 2021; 3 (3): 110-116. doi: 10.35366/103187.

  5. Trunce MST, Villarroel QGP, García AKI. Telesimulación como estrategia de enseñanza aprendizaje en estudiantes de Nutrición durante la pandemia COVID-19. Inv Ed Med. 2022; 11 (44): 9-22. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/invedumed/iem-2022/iem2244b.pdf

  6. Mercado-Cruz E, Morales-Acevedo JA, Lugo-Reyes G, Quintos-Romero AP, Esperón-Hernández RI. Telesimulación: una estrategia para desarrollar habilidades clínicas en estudiantes de medicina. Inv Ed Med [revista en la Internet]. 2021; 10 (40): 19-28. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S2007-50572021000400019&script=sci_abstract

  7. McCoy CE, Sayegh J, Alrabah R, Yarris LM. Telesimulation: an innovative tool for health professions education. AEM Educ Train. 2017; 1 (2): 132-136. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10015.

  8. Díaz-Guio DA, Ríos-Barrientos E, Santillán-Roldan PA, et al. Online-synchronized clinical simulation: an efficient teaching-learning option for the COVID-19 pandemic time and: beyond. Adv Simul. 2021; 6: 30. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00183-z

  9. Vaughn J, Lin Y, Leonard C, Yang H, Mancuso J, Blodgett NP, et al. Creating Inclusive learning environments for Chinese and American pediatric nursing students. Clin Simul Nurs. 2022; 71: 19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2022.07.003.

  10. Illesca Pretty M, Novoa Moreno R, Cabezas González M, Hernández Díaz A, González Osorio L. Simulación clínica: opinión de estudiantes de enfermería, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco. Enfermería (Montevideo) [Internet]. 2019; 8 (2): 51-65. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.edu.uy/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2393-66062019000200051&lng=es

  11. Moore P, Leighton MI, Alvarado C, Bralic C. Pacientes simulados en la formación de los profesionales de salud: el lado humano de la simulación. Rev Med Chile [Internet]. 2016; 144 (5): 617-625. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-98872016000500010&lng=es. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872016000500010

  12. Duch Christensen M, Oestergaard D, Dieckmann P, Watterson L. Learners' perceptions during simulation-based training: an interview study comparing remote versus locally facilitated simulation-based training. Simul Healthc. 2018; 13 (5): 306-315. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000300.

  13. Zapko KA, Ferranto MLG, Blasiman R, Shelestak D. Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation: A descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 60: 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.09.006.

  14. Belfi LM, Dean KE, Bartolotta RJ, Shih G, Min RJ. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19: A virtual solution to the introductory radiology elective. Clin Imaging. 2021; 75: 67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.01.013.

  15. Dhar P, Rocks T, Samarasinghe RM, Stephenson G, Smith C. Augmented reality in medical education: students' experiences and learning outcomes. Med Educ Online. 2021; 26 (1): 1953953. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1953953.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com