medigraphic.com
ISSN 1729-519X (Print)

2021, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas 2021; 20 (5)

Principal components to evaluate the minimum intervention in cariology in the Dentistry curriculum

Chaple-Gil AM, Gispert-Abreu EÁ

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-7
PDF size: 683.79 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The evaluations of the knowledge system conceived in the university studies require practical tools to specify the search for weaknesses in the different processes.
Objective: To determine the main components of an instrument used to evaluate the cognitive-practical capacities necessary for the teaching-learning of the minimum intervention in the treatment of dental caries in the Dentistry curriculum.
Material and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 52 teachers participated in the retest previously carried out in a reliability study. The data from the pilot study resulting from the validation process of the form were used to perform the parametric analyzes that will be described. From this, the values ​​of the evaluation carried out in the retest were extracted, adjusting it to an acceptable sample for this type of study. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett's sphericity test, analysis of communalities, analysis of variance and the regrouping of the items in the proposed dimensions were performed with the Varimax rotation.
Results: The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin exceeded the acceptable minimum (0,763) and the level of significance was p <0.000 according to the Bartlett´s test, so the factor analysis was appropriate. It was observed that all the variables were well explained by the model with measures of variability between 85,8 % and 97,7 %. The first 6 components have greater weight to explain the data, with respective figures of 29,6 %, 24,0 %, 14,0 %, 10,9 %, 8,4 % and 6,7 %, therefore they explain 93,6 % of the variability.
Conclusions: The main components were renamed according to the factors they grouped.


REFERENCES

  1. Borges AF, Dutra CEM, de Moraes RN. Factorial analysis method applied to a data set on problematizing experimentation in a professional and technological education institution. Laplage Rev [Internet]. 2021 [Citado 18/06/2021];7(1):15. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://laplageemrevista.editorialaar.com/index.php/lpg1/article/download/679/630

  2. Miravet LM, García Carpintero AA, Vidal AD, Bellmunt TV, Bellmunt IV, Ansuategui FA. Design, validation, and exploratory and factorial analysis of the Cohesiona attitude scale for assessing the effectiveness of cooperative skills workshops. Estud Pedagog [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 23/07/2021];43(1):22. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/estped/v43n1/art13.pdf

  3. Antino M, Alvarado JM, Asún RA, Bliese P. Rethinking the Exploration of Dichotomous Data: Mokken Scale Analysis Versus Factorial Analysis. Sociol Methods Res [Internet]. 2020 [Citado 23/07/2021];49(4):839-67. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124118769090

  4. Appel P, Schuler M, Vogel H, Oezelsel A, Faller H. Short questionnaire for workplace analysis (Kfza): Factorial validation in physicians and nurses working in hospital settings. J Occup Med Toxicol [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 23/07/2021];12(1):10. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://occup-med.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12995-017-0157-6.pdf

  5. Chaple Gil AM, Gispert Abreu E, Alea González M, Fernández E. La mínima intervención en cariología en el plan de estudios D de la carrera de Estomatología en Cuba. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2021 [Citado 30/01/2021];58(1):9. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/3712

  6. Chaple Gil AM, Corrales Reyes IE, Quintana Muñoz L, Fernández E. Indicadores bibliométricos sobre evaluación de programas de estudio de ciencias médicas en revistas biomédicas cubanas. Rev Habanera Cienc Méd [Internet]. 2020 [Citado 13/10/2020];19(1):13. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revhabanera.sld.cu/index.php/rhab/article/view/2668

  7. Nolla Cao N. Modelo de evaluación de un plan de estudios para las especialidades médicas y estomatológicas . Rev Cubana Educ Méd Sup [Internet]. 1998 [Citado 18/06/2021];12:11. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21411998000200005&nrm=iso

  8. Quindemil Torrijo EM, León FR. Principal component analysis to obtain reduced indicators of measurement in information search. Rev Cubana Inf Cienc Salud [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 18/06/2021];30(3):17. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85074349762&partnerID=40&md5=c8dbb0e3565702a9f2e729c245eaf76e

  9. Chaple Gil AM, Gispert Abreu E, Fernández E. Validación de instrumento sobre capacidades cognitivo-prácticas para el tratamiento de mínima intervención de caries dental en la Carrera de Estomatología. Rev Cubana Estomatol [Internet]. 2021 [Citado 29/03/2021];58(2):e3876. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/article/view/3876

  10. Lang V. Scaling Sensitive Factorial Survey Analysis. Sociol Methods Res [Internet]. 2021 [Citado 29/03/2021];50(2):649-82. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124118799382

  11. Wiens S, Nilsson ME. Performing Contrast Analysis in Factorial Designs: From NHST to Confidence Intervals and Beyond. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 2017;77(4):690-715. Disponible en: http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416668950: 10.1177/0013164416668950

  12. Chaple Gil AM, Gispert Abreu E, Fernández E. Confiabilidad de instrumento sobre capacidades cognitivo-prácticas para el tratamiento de mínima intervención de caries dental en la Carrera de Estomatología. SciELO Preprints [Preprint]. 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.2695

  13. López LEG. Protocolo para realizar análisis factorial en variables que afectan las condiciones laborales. Ingeniare [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 19/06/2021];26(2019):21. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://revistas.unilibre.edu.co/index.php/ingeniare/article/view/6564

  14. Hefetz A, Liberman G. The factor analysis procedure for exploration: A short guide with examples. Cultura y Educacion [Internet]. 2017 [Citado 20/06/2021];29(3):38. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/11356405.2017.1365425

  15. Lloret Segura S, Ferreres Traver A, Hernández Baeza A, Tomás Marco I. El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anal Psicol [Internet]. 2014;30(3):1151-69. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361

  16. Chaple Gil AM, Gispert Abreu E, Fernández Godoy EM. Base de datos- Confiabilidad de instrumento sobre capacidades cognitivo-prácticas para el tratamiento de mínima intervención de caries dental en la Carrera de Estomatología. [base de datos en Internet]. London: Zenodo; 2021. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5016177

  17. Possebon AP, Faot F, Machado RM, Nascimento GG, Leite FR. Exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis of the OHIP-Edent instrument. Braz Oral Res [Internet]. 2018 [Citado 23/07/2021];32:8. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/j/bor/a/sMvvbZmshdbTY3kdM3N7qhQ/?lang=en&format=pdf

  18. Ledesma RD, Ferrando PJ, Tosi JD. Uso del Análisis Factorial Exploratorio en RIDEP. Recomendaciones para autores y revisores. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica [Internet]. 2019 [Citado 20/06/2021];52(3):8. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP52.3.13

  19. Moreta Herrera R, Lara Salazar M, Camacho Bonilla P, Sanchez Guevera S. Factor analysis, reliability and validity of the general self-efficacy scale (GSE) in ecuadorian students. Psychol Soc Educ [Internet]. 2021 [Citado 20/06/2021];11(2):12. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://ojs.ual.es/ojs/index.php/psye/article/download/2024/3008

  20. Moreta Herrera R, Mayorga Lascano M, Larzabal Fernandez A, Vaca Quintana D. Factor analysis, reliability and validity of a measurement model for the intent of alcohol consumption among ecuadorian teenagers. Health addict Salud Drogas [Internet]. 2020 [Citado 20/06/2021];20(1):10. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://ojs.haaj.org/?journal=haaj&page=article&op=download&path[]=489&path[]=pdf

  21. Kassler D, Nichols Barrer I, Finucane M. Beyond “Treatment Versus Control”: How Bayesian Analysis Makes Factorial Experiments Feasible in Education Research. Eval Rev [Internet]. 2020 [Citado 20/06/2021];44(4):238-61. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X18818903?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com