medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Cutánea Ibero-Latino-Americana

ISSN 0210-5187 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2006; 34 (6)

Allergic contact dermatitis from disinfectants in the alimentary industry

Cardoso R, Robalo CM, Gonçalo M, Figueiredo A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Portugu?s
References: 10
Page: 294-297
PDF size: 220.91 Kb.


Key words:

allergic contact dermatitis, alimentary industry, disinfectants, glutaraldehyde, cloroxylenol, nitrile latex gloves.

Text Extraction

The authors report a case of allergic contact dermatitis in the alimentary industry due to contact with disinfectants containing glutaraldehyde andchloroxylenol. In our study, testing these allergens over fragments of different types of gloves, showed that only nitrile latex gloves conferred protec-tion against chloroxylenol and a partial protection against glutaraldehyde.
The authors stress the importance of testing these disinfectants in the alimentary industry where care about bacterial contamination needs to betaken care of.


REFERENCES

  1. Timmer C. Antimicrobials and disinfectants. In Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg JE, Maibach Eds- Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Hiedelberg, 2000, pp. 462-473.

  2. 2.Barbaud A. Occupational dermatitis in health care personnel. Rev Prat 2002;1:52: 125-32.

  3. Nettis E, Colanardi MC, Soccio AL, Ferrannini A, Tursi A. Occupational irritant and allergic contact dermatitis among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2002;46:101-7.

  4. Shaffer MP, Belsito DV. Allergic contact dermatitis from glutaraldehyde in health-care workers. Contact Dermatitis 2000;43:150-156.

  5. 5.Hilton J, Dearman RJ, Harvey P, Evans P, Basketter DA, Kimber I. Estimation of relative skin sensitizing potency using the local lymph node assay: a comparison of formaldehyde with glutaraldehyde. Am J Contact Derm 1998;9:29-33.

  6. 6.Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Swierczynska-Machura D. Most frequent causes of allergic contact dermatitis in farmers: based on material collected in the Nofer institute of occupational Medicine, Lodz. Med Pr 2003;54:237-243.

  7. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Kr cisz B. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in hairdressers due to glutaraldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44:185-186.

  8. 8.Mowad C. Chloroxylenol causing hand dermatitis in a plumber. Am J Contact Derm 1998;9:128-129.

  9. Gonçalo M, Gonçalo S, Moreno A. Immediate and delayed hypersensitivity to chlorocresol. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:46-47.

  10. Yamano T, Shimizu M, Noda T. Allergenicity evaluation of p-chloro-m-cresol and p-chloro-m-xylenol by non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay and multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test. Toxicology 2003;28:190:259-266.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Cutan Iber Lat Am. 2006;34