medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2023; 26 (1)

Relaciones, conflictos vinculares y comunicación en familias oyentes con un miembro sordo

Maya MJG, López- Aymes G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 34-59
PDF size: 501.70 Kb.


Key words:

hearing parents, deaf children, family relationships, relationship conflicts, sign language.

ABSTRACT

Family plays a key role in the development of its members. It is immersed in different contexts with which it maintains constant interaction and a continuous process of change and restructuring, always seeking a certain state of balance. These processes, on many occasions, are conflictive. For example, the arrival of a child with a disability in a family is often shocking and will have repercussions throughout their development. This birth is perceived as unexpected and strange, it breaks the expectations of the parents regarding the desired child, and triggers a strong crisis in the family, causing very peculiar psychological and social contingencies. Parents respond to this event according to their own life history, abilities to cope with problems, socioeconomic status, educational level, among other factors. This study aims to describe the relationships, possible conflicts, and forms of communication in hearing parents in whose families one of the children is deaf. It is a qualitative study, predominantly descriptive. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and a sociodemographic questionnaire was applied. Data analysis was performed by constant comparison, coding the data, and building categories. Participants report having experienced what the literature calls a shock phase upon learning of the deafness of their child, as well as a reaction phase in which they begin a process of mourning the imaginary child they have lost, as well as a search for supports that allow them to face the arrival in their family of a child with a disability, and finally an acceptance phase in which, although not everything is resolved, they establish dynamics that favor the development of the child with a disability to a greater or lesser extent, although they continue to live times of difficulties in different aspects of family dynamics. These phases are colored by various thoughts and feelings that they constantly grapple with. Different conflicts were found in family ties. With regard to communication, it is observed that mothers are the ones who have a greater Mexican Sign Language domain, followed by siblings, who become interpreters in different contexts; in general, extended family does not show interest in learning Mexican Sign Language to communicate with the deaf relative, although there are exceptions.


REFERENCES

  1. Aguirre, E. (2000). Socialización y prácticas de crianza. En Aguirre, E. y Durán, E.(Eds.), Socialización: prácticas de crianza y cuidado de la salud (pp. 15-92). Bogotá, D. C., CES - Universidad Nacional de Colombia.Álvarez, A. Y. y Pérez, C. G. (2011). Indicadores familiares y educativos asociadosal aprendizaje de la lectura y la escritura en adultos sordos. Ponencia en elXI Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa, realizado en la Ciudad deMéxico, del 7 al 11 de Noviembre de 2011. Recuperado de:http://www.comie.org.mx/congreso/memoriaelectronica/v11/docs/area_10/0919.pdf

  2. Atkin, K., Ahmad, W. y Jones, L. (2002). Young South Asian deaf people and theirfamilies: negotiating relationships and identities. Sociology of Health yIllness, 24(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00002

  3. Báez, J. (2012). Investigación cualitativa. 2ª ed., Madrid: ALFAOMEGA/ ESIC.

  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological model of human development. En T.Postlethwaite y H. Torsten (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education(pp. 37- 43), vol.3, 2nd. ed. Oxford: Elsevier.

  5. Carrete, P. (2012). Familias con un miembro con discapacidad. EVIDENCIA -Actualización en la Práctica Ambulatoria, 15(1), 26-29.https://doi.org/10.51987/EVIDENCIA.V15I1.6224

  6. Corvera, J., y González, F. (2000). Psicodinamia de la Sordera. Gaceta Médica deMéxico, 136(2), 139-152. Recuperado dehttps://www.imbiomed.com.mx/articulo.php?id=27511

  7. Durán, M. (2011). Familia y discapacidad: Vivencias de madres y padres queTienen un/a hijo/a ciego/a o sordo/a. Tesis de maestría. Caracas,Venezuela: Universidad Central de Venezuela. Recuperado dehttps://www.coursehero.com/file/57532139/Familia-y-discapacidad-Vivencias-de-madres-y-padres-que-tienen-un-hijo-ciego-o-sordopdf/

  8. Feher-Prout, T. (1996). Stress and Coping in Families with Deaf Children. Journalof Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(3), 155- 166.https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014291

  9. López-Aymes, G., Acuña, S., y Mercado, A. (2013). Niños y niñas con altascapacidades intelectuales y sus familias. En A. Bazán y C. Butto (Coords.),Psicología y contextos educativos (pp. 102- 116). México: UniversidadPedagógica Nacional.

  10. Luckner, J. L. and Velaski, A. (2004). Healthy families of children who are deaf.American Annals of the Deaf, 149(4), 324-335.https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2005.0003

  11. Mercado, E. y García, L. (2010). Necesidades sociales de las personas condiscapacidad en edad escolar y sus familias. Cuadernos de Trabajo Social,23, 9-24. Recuperado dehttp://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/portal/modulos.php?name=Revistas2yid=CUTS

  12. Mercado, A. E. (2011). Características y necesidades de orientación de lasfamilias con hijos con altas capacidades y aptitudes sobresalientes. Tesisde maestría inédita. Morelos, México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado deMorelos.

  13. Núñez, B. (2003). La familia con un hijo con discapacidad: Sus conflictosvinculares. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría, 101(2), 133-142. Recuperadode https://www.sap.org.ar/docs/publicaciones/archivosarg/2003/133.pdf

  14. Ortega, P., Torres, L., Garrido, A. y Reyes, A. (2006). Actitudes de los padres en lasociedad actual con hijos e hijas con necesidades especiales. Psicología yCiencia Social, 8(1), 21- 32. Recuperado dehttps://www.redalyc.org/pdf/314/31480103.pdf

  15. Pichardo, M. C., Justicia, F., Fernández, M. (2009). Prácticas de crianza ycompetencia social en niños de 3 a 5 años. Pensamiento Psicológico, 6(13),37-47. Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/801/80112469004.pdf

  16. Pérez, L. (2004). Superdotación y familia. Faísca, 11, 17-36. Recuperado dehttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2476401

  17. Restrepo, P. (2010). Sentidos familiares de la discapacidad: ¿narrativasdiscapacitantes? Textos y sentidos, 1, 83- 94. Recuperado dehttps://revistas.ucp.edu.co/index.php/textosysentidos/article/view/1019/999

  18. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, B.; Hernández-Nodarse, T.; Santos-Fernández, D. Y., yCarrera-Morales, M. (2016). Caracterización de las familias con hijos sordospara el desarrollo de la orientación educativa. Ra Ximhai, 12(5), 27-39.Recuperado de https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=4614758400218. Salamanca, M. y Picón, C. G. (2008). Psicoterapia en familias con miembrosSordos: un modelo sistémico. Recuperado de: http://www.culturasorda.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/03/Salamanca_Picon_Psicoterapia_sistemica_sordos_2008.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2023;26