medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medimay

ISSN 2520-9078 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana 2022; 29 (1)

Use of serum lactate as a prognostic biomarker in patients with sepsis in Intensive Care

Hernández OM, Fernández CI, Ávila MI, Hernández JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 22-31
PDF size: 702.00 Kb.


Key words:

lactate, sepsis, prognosis, intensive care.

ABSTRACT

Sepsis is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in Intensive Care, it causes organic and tissue hypo-perfusion dysfunction.
Objective: To evaluate the use of serum lactate, as an individual prognostic biomarker, in patients admitted with sepsis in Intensive Care.
Methods: An observational, cross-sectional and retrospective study was carried out in patients admitted with sepsis, at ¨Aleida Fernández Chardiet¨ Teaching Clinical Surgical hospital, in 2019. The population under study was formed by 121 patients.
Results: Lactate values behaved differently among the population which was not able to survive (p˂0.001). The area under the curve for lactate was of a 71 %. The presence of 3 or more organs in dysfunction, 20.7 %, (p≤0.001) they were related to the levels of lactate, as well as the prognostic scales. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation system score II≥15 (˂0.001), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3≥50 (˂0.001) and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment≥4 (˂0.001). the medium blood pressure had an average of 90±19 mmHg, with difference among their medium values with respect to lactate that resulted significant (p˂0.001). The base deficit was related to the lactate in contrast with their figures (p=0.002). Lactate ≥2.2 mmol/L as only variable, had a higher risk of death (OR=6.4, IC95 % 2.9 al 14.1, p˂0.001).
Conclusions: This study considers that the serum lactate ≥ 2.2 mmol/L constitutes an individual prognostic bio-marker, in patients admitted with sepsis, in Intensive Care.


REFERENCES

  1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA [Internet]. 2016 [citado 12 Dic 2019];315(8): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2492881

  2. Yébenes JC, Ruiz Rodriguez JC, Ferrer R, Clčries M, Bosch A, Lorencio C, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in Catalonia: analysis of incidence and outcomes in a European setting. Ann Intensive Care [Internet]. 2017[citado 20 Feb 2020];7(19): [aprox. 9p.]. Disponible: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13613-017-0241-1

  3. Gattinoni L, Vasques F, Camporota L, Meessen J, Romitti F, Pasticci L, et al. Understanding lactatemia in human sepsis potential impact for early management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(5): 582–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201812-2342OC

  4. Bermúdez Rengifo WA, Fonseca Ruiz NJ. Utilidad del lactato en el paciente críticamente enfermo. Acta Colom Cuid Intensivo [Internet].2016[citado 15 Jun 2020];16(2): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S012272621600015X

  5. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Mulder PG, Rommes JH, Schieveld SJ,Bakker J. The prognostic value of blood lactate levels relative to that of vital signs in the pre-hospital setting: A pilot study. Crit Care. 2008; 12(6): R160.: [aprox. 8p.]. doi: 10.1186/cc7159

  6. Green JP, Berger T, Garg N, Shapiro NI. Serum lactate is a better predictor of short-term mortality when stratified by C-reactive protein in adult emergency department patients hospitalized for a suspected infection. Ann Emerg Med [Internet]. 2011 [citado 8 Jun 2020]; 57(3):291-5.Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0196064410017099?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0196064410017099%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=https:%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2F

  7. Ryoo SM, Lee L, Lee YS, Lee JH, Lim KS, Huh JW, et al. Lactate level versus lactate clearance for predicting mortality in patients with septic schok defined by sepsis-3. Crit Care Med [Internet].2018 [citado 2 Ago 2020];46(6): [aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29432347/

  8. Kluge S, de Heer G, Jarczak D, Nierhaus A, Fuhrmann V. Lakatatazidose – Update 2018. Dtsch Med Wochenschr [Internet].2018 [citado 2 Jun 2020];143(15):[aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30060277/

  9. Moran JL, Santamaria J. Reconsidering lactate as a sepsis risk biomarker. PLoS ONE. 2017 Oct;12(10): e0185320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185320

  10. Liu Z, Meng Z, Li Y, Zhao J, Wu S, Gou S, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with Sepsis. Scandinavian Journal Trauma Resuscitation Emergency Medicine.2019; 27:51 [aprox. 10p.]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-019-0609-3

  11. Cheng HH, Chen FC, Change MW, Kung CT, Cheng CY, Tsai TC, et al. Difference between elderly and non-elderly patients using serum lactate to predict mortality caused by sepsis in the emergency department. Medicine. 2018;97(13):e0209 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000010209

  12. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, Seymour CW, Liu VX, Deutschman CS, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock. JAMA.2016; 315(8): 775–87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289

  13. Rhee C, Zhang Z, Kadri SS, Murphy DJ, Martin GS, Overton E, et al. Sepsis Surveillance Using Adult Sepsis Events Simplified eSOFA Criteria Versus Sepsis-3 Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Criteria. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2019 [citado 4 Jul 2020]; 47(3): 307-14. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6383796/

  14. Dong Hyun OH, HyunKim M, YongJeong W, ChanKim Y, EunSong EJ, Young Jung In et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with low lactate level and septic shock. J Microbiol Immunol Infect[Internet].2019[citado 4 Jul 2020];52(3):418-25. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1684118217301901

  15. Liu Y, Zheng J, Zhang D, Jing L. Neutrofil-lymphocyte ratio and plasma lactate predict 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis. J Clin Lab Anal [Internet]. 2019 [citado 2 Jun 2020]; 33(7): [aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6757133/pdf/JCLA-33-e22942.pdf

  16. Trujillo Ramírez N, López Reséndiz SM, Méndez Reyes R, Villagómez Ortiz AJ, Rosas Barrientos JV. Índice lactato/albúmina como predictor de mortalidad en sepsis y choque séptico. Med Crit [Internet] 2018 [citado 27 Jul 2020]; 32(3): [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2448-89092018000300136&Ing=es&nrm=iso

  17. Lichtenauer M, Wernly B, Ohnewein B, Franz M, Kabisch B, Muessig J, et al. The Lactate/Albumin Ratio: A Valuable Tool for Risk Stratification in Septic Patients Admitted to ICU. Int J Mol Sci.2017;18(9):1893. doi: 10.3390/ijms18091893

  18. Shin J, Hwang SY, Jo IJ, Kim WY, Ryoo SM, Kang GH, et al. Prognostic value of the lactate/albumin ratio for predicting 28-day mortality in critically ill. Shock.2018;50(5):545-50. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001128

  19. Ryoo SM, Ahn R, Shin TG, Jo YH, Chung SP, Beom JH, et al. Lactate normalization within 6 hours of bundle therapy and 24 hours of delayed achievement were associated with 28-day mortality in septic shock patients. PLoS One [Internet].2019 [citado 3 Jun 2020]; 14(6):[aprox. 10 p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6546246/pdf/pone.0217857.pdf

  20. Ryoo SM, Ahn R, Lee J, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Huh JW, et al. Timing of Repeated Lactate Measurement in Patients with Septic Shock at the Emergency Department. Am J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2 Ago 2020];356(2): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0002962918301782?via%3Dihub




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista de Ciencias Médicas de la Habana. 2022;29