medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía de Columna

ISSN 2992-7749 (Electronic)
ISSN 2992-7897 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de difusión científica de la Asociación Mexicana de Cirujanos de Columna A. C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Políticas
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas editoriales generales
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Columna 2023; 1 (4)

Vertebroplasty: element for correction of sagital balance in fragility fractures

Delgadillo GAA, Ramírez EJF, García QIA, Ferreira DBR, Corona PÓ, Jiménez ÁJM
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/113721

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/113721
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/113721

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 211-220
PDF size: 268.43 Kb.


Key words:

vertebroplasty, fragility, osteoporosis, vertebral fracture, sagittal balance.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: vertebral compression fractures are common in elderly populations. The main cause is osteoporosis and can cause back pain, spinal deformities, mobility problems, reduced lung function, clinical depression, neural compromise and even paralysis. For many years, spine surgeons focused on local treatment of spinal pathology without considering overall spinal alignment. The objective of the study is to identify vertebral fragility fractures, make a comparison between metabolic and tumor causes, as well as to verify if there is improvement in sagittal balance after treatment with percutaneous vertebroplasty. Material and methods: a retrospective cohort study was carried out consisting of 146 patients with vertebral fractures due to traumatic, degenerative, metabolic, oncological and infectious causes treated by vertebroplasty alone or accompanied by another procedure such as biopsy or instrumentation, during the period included. between April 15, 2015 to June 13, 2023 at the "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez" National Medical Center of the West Specialty Hospital. The appearance of improvement secondary to the surgical process was observed. Patients of any gender and age diagnosed with fractures in the spine treated with vertebroplasty were included. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were obtained, generating measurements of: pelvic incidence, pelvic inclination, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis and performing the calculation of spine harmony. pelvic. Results: a capture sheet was made with data from the clinical record, which included patients with spinal fracture managed only with percutaneous vertebroplasty; 104 patients were found, of them there were 84 (81%) women and 20 (19%) men. The demographic data resulted in the origin of the injury being traumatic in 24 (23%) patients, degenerative in six (6%), infectious in four (4%), tumorous in 30 (29%) and metabolic in 40 (38%). The symptoms prior to the condition and after the intervention were compared, reporting clinical improvement in the case of metabolic etiology in 37 cases (93%) while in three (8%) patients no reduction in symptoms was noted. Conclusions: despite some limitations, such as the lack of an established time control in the measurement of spino-pelvic parameters, vertebroplasty is presented as an effective and safe option for the management of vertebral fractures, an improvement was observed in the symptoms of the patients in the postoperative period and in the follow-up one month after the intervention. In addition, other studies have supported the effectiveness and safety of vertebroplasty in improving the quality of life and function of patients, especially in those with alterations in the sagittal axis of the spine.


REFERENCES

  1. Mao W, Dong F, Huang G, He P, Chen H, Qin S, Li A. Risk factors for secondary fractures to percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16: 644. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02722-w.

  2. Halvachizadeh S, Stalder AL, Bellut D, Hoppe S, Rossbach P, Cianfoni A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of 3 treatment arms for vertebral compression fractures: a comparison of improvement in pain, adjacent-level fractures, and quality of life between vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, and nonoperative management. JBJS Rev. 2021; 9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.21.00045.

  3. Barreto SR, Barbi GJC, Belloni CR, Mendes dos Santos LH, Alexandre GE, Amelunge RCA, et al. Vertebroplasty in bone fragility fractures and tumor fractures: risks and benefits. Coluna/Columna 2022; 21: e261926. doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120222102257080. Available in: https://www.scielo.br/j/coluna/a/tG5w4pzXFmm5RZFL9r9zxSg/?lang=en#

  4. López-Herradón A, Piñera AR, Tomé F, Rodríguez-Arguisjuela MG, Saura PA, Saura J, et al. Eficacia y seguridad a largo plazo del polimetilmetacrilato (PMMA) en pacientes osteoporóticos tratados mediante vertebroplastia percutánea. Revista de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral. 2019; 11: 92-97. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s1889-836x2019000400003

  5. Kushchayev SV, Wiener PC, Teytelboym OM, Arrington JA, Khan M, Preul MC. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a history of procedure, technology, culture, specialty, and economics. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2019; 29: 481-494. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2019.07.011. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31677725/

  6. Noguchi T, Yamashita K, Kamei R, Maehara J. Current status and challenges of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP). Jpn J Radiol. 2023; 41: 1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11604-022-01322-w. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35943687/

  7. Jime?nez-A?vila JM, Patiño-López JM, García-Rosas LA, Gonza?lez-Cisneros AC. Calidad de vida y balance sagital en la evolución de los pacientes con mieloma múltiple tratados con vertebroplastía percutánea. Rev Cubana Ortop Traumatol. 2020; 34: 1-15. Disponible en: <http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-215X2020000200013&lng=es&nrm=iso>

  8. Prost S, Pesenti S, Fuentes S, Tropiano P, Blondel B. Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107: 102779. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102779.

  9. Sparrey CJ, Bailey JF, Safaee M, Clark AJ, Lafage V, Schwab F, Smith JS, Ames CP. Etiology of lumbar lordosis and its pathophysiology: a review of the evolution of lumbar lordosis, and the mechanics and biology of lumbar degeneration. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 36: E1. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13551.

  10. Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Yoshida M. Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 426-432.

  11. Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K. Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J. 2016; 25: 3675-3686.

  12. Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V, Henry JK, Gum J, Smith J, et al. Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds: should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41: 62-68.

  13. Ochtman AEA, Kruyt MC, Jacobs WCH, Kersten RFMR, le Huec JC, Oner FC, et al. Surgical restoration of sagittal alignment of the spine: correlation with improved patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS Rev. 2020; 8: e1900100. Available from: https://www.jbjs.org/reader.php?rsuite_id=2540137&source=JBJS_Reviews/8/8/e19.00100&topics=sp#

  14. León-Vega E, Castillón-Benavides OJ, Escamilla-Gutiérrez E, Smirnov-Castro AI, Muñoz-Romero I, Martínez-Anda JJ, et al. Balance sagital en columna vertebral: conceptos y aplicación básica. An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2022; 67: 293-299. doi: 10.35366/108782.

  15. Cavanilles-Walker JM, Rodríguez Montserrat D, Plano Jerez X, Iborra González M, Ubierna Garcés MT, Ríos Guillermo J, et al. Sagittal imbalance influences outcome of vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2022; 66: 348-354. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2021.04.002.

  16. Silva RB, Goncalves JCB, Cabral RB, Santos LHM dos, Galdeano EA, Rodriguez CAA, et al. Vertebroplastía en fracturas por fragilidad ósea y fracturas tumorales: riesgos y beneficios. Coluna/Columna. 2022; 21: e261926. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-185120222104261926

  17. Paksoy K. The impact of vertebroplasty on sagittal parameters in traumatic thoracic vertebral fractures. Int Arch Orthop Surg. 2023; 6: 033. doi.org/10.23937/2643-4016/1710033 Disponible en: https://clinmedjournals.org/articles/iaos/international-archives-of-orthopaedic-surgery-iaos-6-033.pdf

  18. Kirkegaard AO, Sorensen ST, Ziegler DS, Carreon L, Andersen MO, Rousing R. Percutaneous vertebroplasty is safe and effective for cancer-related vertebral compression fractures. Dan Med J. 2018; 65: A5509. Available in: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30269751/




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Columna. 2023;1