medigraphic.com
ISSN 1726-6718 (Electronic)
Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Anestesiología y Reanimación 2022; 21 (1)

Protective ventilation strategies in cardiovascular surgery

Alonso VJA, Falcón GM, Hernández RM, de Arazoza HA, Nodal LP, Saínz CH

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 1-14
PDF size: 318.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: The alteration in gas exchange is a complication of cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. The cause of this deterioration is multifactorial. During the shunt, both lungs collapse and at the end of the extracorporeal circulation the lungs expand again, without a standard technique for it. The application of alveolar recruitment during general anesthesia in this type of surgery improves arterial oxygenation. Multiple strategies are used and have as a reference the extracorporeal circulation and its contribution to the pulmonary and systemic inflammatory response. This forces the anesthesiologist to understand the pathophysiology of lung injury associated with mechanical ventilation.
Objective: Describe essential aspects of pathophysiology of pulmonary injury associated with mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgical procedures and the effect of perioperative protective mechanical ventilation as a strategy to prevent it.
Method: A search of the literature published during the period between January 1990 and December 2020 was carried out that referred to protective mechanical ventilation strategies in cardiovascular surgery.
Results: Experimental and clinical evidence suggest that low current volumes of pulmonary ventilation and the application for a short period of increased inspiratory pressures, known as "recruitment maneuvers" followed by the application of positive pressure at the end of expiration to keep the recruited alveoli open, increase functional residual capacity and reduce lung injury associated with mechanical ventilation. These recommendations have been extrapolated from retrospective studies conducted in other types of populations.
Conclusions: There is no strong evidence that this strategy decreases the proinflammatory response, improves postoperative lung function and decreases perioperative mortality, when compared to conventional ventilation.


REFERENCES

  1. Hachenberg T, Tenling A, Nyström SO, Tyden H, Hendenstierna G. Ventilation-perfusion in equality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 1994[acceso: 21/02/2021];80(3):509-19. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8141447/

  2. Pérez Nieto OR, Deloya TE, Lomelí Terán JM, Pozos Cortés KM, Monares Zepeda E, Poblano Morales MN. Presión de distensión (driving pressure): Principal objetivo de la protección alveolar. Neumol Cir Torax. 2018[acceso: 21/02/2021];77(3):322-7. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_artex&pid=S0028-37462018000300222&ing=es

  3. Bignami E, Saglietti F, Di Lullo A. Mechanical ventilation management during cardiothoracic surgery: an open challenge. Ann Trans Med. 2018[acceso: 21/02/2021];6(19):380. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC6212361#_ffn_sectitle

  4. Bignami E, Di Lull A, Saglietti F, Guarnieri M, Pota V, Scolletta S, et al. Routine practice in mechanical ventilation in cardiac surgery in Italy. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(4):1571-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2019.03.04

  5. Güldner A, Kiss T, Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Canet J, Spieth PM, et al. Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(3):692-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000754

  6. Lindberg P, Gunnarsson L, Tokics L, Secher E, Lundquist H, Brismar B, et al. Atelectasis and lung function in the post-operative period. Acta Anesthesiological Scandinavia. 1992;36(6):546-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1992.tb03516.x

  7. Tusman G, Bohm SH, Vasquez de Anda GF, Do Campo JL, Lachman B. Alveolar recruitment strategy improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;82(1):8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/82.1.8

  8. Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Medicine. 1992 acceso: 21/02/2021];118:319-21. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1469157/

  9. Kotani N, Hashimoto H, Sessler DI, Muraoka M, Wang JS, O' Connor MF, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass produces greater pulmonary and systemic proinflammatory cytokines. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(5):1039-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200005000-00008

  10. Jerrold HL, Kenichi AT. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:S715-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04701-x

  11. Slutsky AS. Lung injury caused by mechanical ventilation. Chest. 1999;116:9-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.suppl_1.9s-a

  12. Pugin J. Molecular mechanisms of lung cell activation induced by cyclic Stretch. Crit Care Med. 2003[acceso: 21/02/2021];31(4 suppl):S200-6. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12682441/

  13. Eichacker PQ, Gerstenberger EP, Banks SM, Cui X, Natanson C. Meta-analysis of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome trials testing low tidal volumes. Am J Respir Cri Care Med. 2002;166(11):1510-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200208-956OC

  14. Kotani N, Hashimoto H, Sessler DI, Muraoka M, Wang JS, O' Connor MF, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass produces greater pulmonary than systemic proinflammatory cytokines. Anesth Analg. 2000[acceso: 21/02/2021];90:1039-45. Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=261123426008

  15. Jerrold HL, Kenichi AT. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:S715-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04701-x

  16. Hans G, Sottiaux TM, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Ventilator management during routine anesthesia. European Journal of Anesthesiology. 2009;26:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b000e000000f1fb

  17. Zupancich E, Paparella D, Turani F, Munch C, Rossi A, Massaccesi S, et al. Mechanical ventilation affects inflammatory mediators in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Thora Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:378-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.11.061

  18. Asimakopoulos G, Taylor KM, Smith PL, Ratnatunga CP. Prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;117:620-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5223(99)70348-x

  19. Jung Cho E, Hyun Yoon J, Jin Hong S, Hee Lee S, Bo Sim S. The effects of Sevoflurane on systemic and pulmonary inflammatory responses after cardiopulmonary bypass. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2009;23(5):639-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2009.01.025

  20. Sundar S, Novack V, Jervis K, Bender P, Lerner A, Panzica P, et al. Influence of low tidal volume ventilation on time to extubation in cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1102-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318215e254

  21. Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Ventilator management of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a consensus of two. Crit. Care. Med. 2004;32:250-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000104946.66723.A8

  22. Amato M, Barbas C, Medeiros D, Schettino G, Filho G, Kairalla R, et al. Beneficial effects of the "open lung approach" with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:1835-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.6.8520744

  23. Ranieri V, Suter P, Tortorella C, De Tullio R, Dayer J, Brienza A, et al. Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress ssyndrome a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:54-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.?282.1.54

  24. Gottlieb JE. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. N Engl J Med. 2000[acceso: 21/02/2021];342:1301-8. Disponible en: https://nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejm200005043421801#:~:text=conclusion

  25. Brower R, Shanholtz C, Fessler H, Shade D, White P, Wiener C, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1492-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199908000-00015

  26. Futier E, Constantin J, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(5):428-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1301082

  27. Treschan T, Kaisers W, Schaefer M, Bastin B, Schmalz U, Wania V, et al. Ventilation with low tidal volumes during upper abdominal surgery does not improve postoperative lung function. Brit J Anaesth. 2012;109:263-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes140

  28. Sundar S, Novack V, Jervis K, Bender S, Lerner A, Panzica P, et al. Influence of low tidal volume ventilation on time to extubation in cardiac surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:1102-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318215e254

  29. Lellouche F, Dionne S, Simard S, Bussieres J, Dagenais F. High tidal volumes in mechanically ventilated patients increase e organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:1072-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182522df5

  30. Martínez A, Andrade G. Ventilación mecánica en cirugía cardíaca: actualidades. Mediciencias UTA. 2020[acceso: 21/02/2021];4(3):25-30. Disponible en: https://medicienciasuta.uta.edu.ec/index.php/MedicienciasUTA/article/view/364

  31. Hinrichs J, Lodewyks C, Neilson C, Abou-Setta A, Grocott HP. The impact of hyperoxia on out come after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Can J Anesth/J Can Anesth. 2018;65(8):923-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-018-1143-x

  32. The PROVECS Study Group, Lagier D, Fischer F, Fornier W, Huynh TM, Cholley B, et al. Effect of open-lung vs conventional perioperative ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complication after on-pump cardiac surgery: the PROVECS randomized clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(10):1401-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05741-8

  33. Hsu H, Lai H-C, Liu T-J. Factors causing prolonged mechanical ventilation and Perioperative morbidity after robot-assisted coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Heart Vessels. 2019;34(1):44-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-018-1221-6

  34. Arango-Granados MC, Ariza F. Ventilación protectora y maniobras de reclutamiento pulmonar en cirugía mayor. Rev Argent de Anestesiol. 2016;74(1):1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.raa.2016.05.002




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com