medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes

ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2023; 12 (4)

Accepting kidneys from overweight or obese living donors remains a thorny issue

Martínez-Ulloa Torres, Jorge1; Gutiérrez-Torres, Paulo Irán1; Bolado-García, Patricia Berenice1; Cisneros-Paredes, Alejandra1; Cornelis-López, Natali1; Hernández-Domínguez, Mariano1; Baas-Cruz, Juan Pablo1; González-Contreras, Ismael1; Aguilar-Castillejos, Luis Fernando1
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/113801

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/113801
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/113801

Language: English
References: 20
Page: 181-187
PDF size: 291.98 Kb.


Key words:

Yucatan kidney transplantation, expanded-criteria living donors, overweight and obesity.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: due to the immense need for transplants, it is more common in daily practice to accept expanded-criteria living donors (ECLDs), especially within the growing global epidemic of overweight and obesity. The impact on post-nephrectomy residual renal function should be carefully analyzed in this population. Preoperative evaluation should predict a minimum compensation rate of at least 60%. Objective: correlate overweight and obesity with renal compensation rate at one year of follow-up. Material and methods: a retrospective analytical observational study in southeastern Mexico, between 2015-2021. Renal compensation rate was calculated before and one year after donation. Results: 48 kidney donors were included with a median age of 38.98 ± 10.37 years, 56% were men. The average BMI was 27.68 ± 2.84 kg/m2; 85.4% of the donors had a BMI > 25 kg/m2. Kidney compensation rate over 60% was 70.9 ± 15.41%. The eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 12 months after nephrectomy in overweight or obese donors was 18.75%. The calculated cross product ratios (OR) were as follows: eGFR > 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with normal BMI OR = 0.820 (95% CI 0.71-0.95; p < 0.05); eGFR > 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with age < 50 years OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.94; p < 0.05); compensation < 60% for high BMI OR = 1.940 (95% CI 0.21-18.07; p > 0.05). Conclusions: overweight and obesity itself may limit acceptability for organ donation, particularly important for younger donor candidates.



INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant donors lose 50% of their kidney mass after nephrectomy, and the remaining kidney must compensate for this loss. Risk factors associated with poor renal compensation after donation are not well understood in southeastern Mexican population.

Given the organ shortage from cadaveric donors, living kidney donation has become an acceptable and safe option for both the donor and the recipient.1 Our transplant program has performed 469 kidney transplants in the last 20 years, of which 70% have been from living donors.

Due to the immense need for transplants, it is more common in daily practice to accept expanded-criteria living donors (ECLDs), especially within the growing global epidemic of overweight and obesity.2 The use of suboptimal quality kidneys from marginal living donors have demonstrated comparable short-term and long-term outcomes for recipients but there are few reports on the long-term outcome of these donors.3 Evaluation in ECLDs should consider elderly donors, borderline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), high body mass index (BMI), glucose intolerance and controlled hypertension, among other risk factors.

The impact on post-nephrectomy residual renal function should be carefully analyzed, especially since it can differ between donors based on their individual risk factors, which is important for patient selection, counseling and follow-up care.

Preoperative evaluation should predict a minimum compensation rate of at least 60% and long-term risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), to identify donors whose risk exceeds the acceptable threshold, and to ensure follow-up after surgery.4-6

Some absolute contraindications in our program for living donor nephrectomy include eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, diabetes mellitus, uncontrolled hypertension, proteinuria > 300 mg/24 hours, microhaematuria as well as BMI > 35 kg/m2.5

The association between obesity and chronic and ESRD is well known, the relative risk (RR) in obese patients increases directly with BMI, from 1.9 in overweight patients, to 3.6 in those with class I obesity, 6.1 in those with class II obesity, and 7.1 for those with extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2).7

The objective of this study was to identify the risk factors that negatively affect the renal compensation rate after donation, especially the association in overweight or obese donors, since 80.4% of adults aged 20 years and over, who attend our institution in the state of Yucatan, are overweight and obese.8



MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analytical observational study was carried out, reviewing the records of living donors for kidney transplants performed at a tertiary care center, in southeastern Mexico, between 2015-2021.

Variables analyzed were age, sex, relationship, BMI, blood group, surgical technique, nephrectomy laterality, serum creatinine and eGFR using the CKD-EPI equation before and one year after donation. Finally, one-year renal compensation rate was calculated.

Descriptive statistics were performed with measures of central tendency and measures of variability (spread). Paired sample t-test was performed to compare baseline and 12 months creatinine and eGFR. Cross-product ratios between BMI classes, age and renal compensation rate (≥ 70%, ≥ 60%, or < 60%) were estimated. These variability percentages in creatinine and eGFR at baseline and at 12 months were estimated using ratio statistics. The cumulative incidence for presenting an eGFR < 60 mL/min and for presenting an eGFR < 60 mL/min due to high BMI (overweight or obesity) was calculated.

Recipient operating characteristic (OC) curves were obtained to determine the performance of diagnostic tests for renal function.

The results are presented in tables, graphs and figures, depending on the type of information.



RESULTS

48 kidney donors were included with a median age of 38.98 ± 10.37 years, 56% of which were men. The average BMI was 27.68 ± 2.84 kg/m2; 85.4% of the donors had a BMI > 25 kg/m2; the details on demographic data are shown in Table 1. Regarding the surgical technique, 93.8% underwent open nephrectomy and only 6.3% underwent laparoscopic surgery; 81.3% left nephrectomy.



RENAL FUNCTION DATA

Renal compensation rate over 60% was 70.9 ± 15.41%. Mean creatinine and eGFR before and one year after nephrectomy are shown in Table 2.

The eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 at 12 months after donation was 16.6%; the cumulative incidence for presenting a eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 12 months after nephrectomy in overweight or obese donors was 18.75%. Variation of glomerular filtration by age groups and by BMI are shown in Tables 3 and 4.

The calculated cross product ratios (OR) by associating gender, BMI, and age with eGFR and compensation rate are shown in Figure 1; and were as follows: eGFR > 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with normal BMI OR = 0.820 (95% CI 0.71-0.95; p < 0.05); eGFR > 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 with age < 50 years OR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.70-0.94; p < 0.05); eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in men OR = 0.808 (95% CI 0.468 1.394; p > 0.05); compensation < 60% for high BMI OR = 1.940 (95% CI 0.21-18.07; p > 0.05); compensation < 60% in men OR = 2.526 (95% CI 0.582-11.023; p > 0.05).

The percentile distribution of creatinine and eGFR before and 12 months after nephrectomy, as well as the renal compensation rate, according to age and BMI, are shown in Figure 2.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed diagnostic accuracy in predicting favorable compensation (area under the curve = 0.958; 95% CI 0.925-0.991, p < 0.001). Similarly, having a baseline eGFR > 90 mL/min before donation predicted adequate renal compensation one year after nephrectomy. Creatinine quantification before and after surgery allowed us to observe compensation trends at 12 months of follow-up (Figure 3). Percentile graphs were made with creatinine levels, the eGFRs and the percentage of compensation, baseline and at 12 months, in order to observe the trends according to their BMI.



DISCUSSION

Living donor kidney transplantation has been performed at our institution since 1987, and published experience shows that short- and long-term donor morbidity and mortality is reasonably low.9 However, this article shows evidence that older donors with overweight, obesity and borderline basal creatinine clearance, have greater difficulty compensating for the remaining kidney.

Functional compensation, morbidity and mortality in kidney donors has been discussed for years, apparently ruling out a higher risk of ESRD or death as compared with the general population.10

The above in non-ECLDs groups, but advances in surgical techniques and the increased demand for organ donation and transplantation, has made it necessary to relax the criteria for kidney donation, increasing the use of extended criteria donors, without clearly knowing the long-term functional impact in this group of patients.11

Under usual conditions the remaining kidney compensates for the renal mass loss after nephrectomy and it is estimated to be 70% from baseline.12 The compensation mechanism in healthy individuals is through adaptive hyperfiltration secondary to increased renal blood flow and glomerular hypertrophy.13 Factors associated with poor post-donation renal compensation may vary depending on different donor risk factors. If a donor candidate postdonation risk is above the transplant program acceptable risk threshold, the risk is not acceptable.14

Overweight people are at increased risk for end-stage renal disease (ESRD).15 The ratio found pre and post-nephrectomy eGFR in patients with high BMI was negatively correlated (-0.53; p < 0.001), as described in other series like Altheaby, et. al. who reported that overweight and obese people had a lower glomerular filtration rate one year after nephrectomy.16 These could be explained because of preexisting obesity-related hyperfiltration that may have a diminished capacity to undergo further adaptive hyperfiltration after nephrectomy compared to a normal weight donor.17 Hassan N. Ibrahim, et. al. associated in a series of 1338 obese donors with BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2 a higher risk of eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, as well as development of diabetes, hypertension, and proteinuria, all well-known risk factors for developing ESRD.18 The Spanish Society of Nephrology and Spanish National Transplant Organization guidelines define waistline greater than 82 cm in women or greater than 102 cm in men as additional relative contraindications to donation.19

These same findings have also been reported in non-donor population; a study of 73 patients who underwent unilateral nephrectomy for reasons other than donation found that patients with BMI > 30 kg/m2 had a higher rate of proteinuria and renal insufficiency compared to nonobese patients (92% vs 12%) over 10 to 20 years after nephrectomy.20 Consistent with these data, this study found that the patients who presented greater variability in eGFR were those who were obese and overweight.

These concerns about obese donor higher likelihood of developing hypertension, proteinuria and diabetes (the latter being the most common cause of kidney failure) along with detrimental variations in eGFR trajectory profile should make us reassess the acceptance of overweight or obese donors.

Patients with normal BMI, high glomerular filtration rate and low serum creatinine levels before donation have a better prognosis after nephrectomy, characterized by greater compensation of the remaining kidney.

Donors who are overweight or obese and aged ≥ 50 years have a high risk of low compensation percentage of < 60% one year after surgery.

No association could be established between the degrees of compensation of the remaining kidney with respect to sex.



CONCLUSIONS

Patients with an eGFR > 90 mL/min per 1.73 m2 before donation and a normal BMI have a better prognosis after nephrectomy.

Overweight and obese donors and those older than 50 years have a low renal compensation rate of less than 60% one year after surgery. Having reduced eGFR by virtue of nephrectomy may put overweight and obese donors at a higher risk for kidney failure, if faced with the development of diabetes or hypertension.

These findings suggest that obesity itself may limit acceptability for organ donation, particularly important for younger donor candidates; and should also be taken into account to modify public policies within the first level of primary care.

It is possible that there is an association between the rate of renal compensation related to male gender, but further studies with a larger sample are needed.


REFERENCES

  1. Maggiore U, Budde K, Heemann U, Hilbrands L, Oberbauer R, Oniscu GC et al. Long-term risks of kidney living donation: review and position paper by the ERA-EDTA DESCARTES working group. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32 (2): 216-223. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw429.

  2. Lim HJ, Jambaldorj E, Lee Y, Kang SS, Koo TY, Ahn C et al. Increasing use of the expanded criteria for living kidney donation and good outcomes of living kidney donors in Korea. Transplant Proc. 2016; 48 (7): 2407-2411. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.091.

  3. Fabrizii V, Kovarik J, Bodingbauer M, Kramar R, Horl WH, Winkelmayer WC. Long-term patient and graft survival in the eurotransplant senior program: a single-center experience. Transplantation. 2005; 80 (5): 582-589. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000168340.05714.99.

  4. Hanson CS, Chapman JR, Gill JS, Kanellis J, Wong G, Craig JC et al. Identifying outcomes that are important to living kidney donors. A nominal group technique study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018; 13 (6): 916-926.

  5. Claisse G, Gaillard F, Mariat C. Living kidney donor evaluation. Transplantation. 2020; 104 (12): 2487-2496.

  6. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150 (9): 604-612.

  7. Sachdeva M. Should obesity affect suitability for kidney donation? Semin Dial. 2018; 31 (4): 353-356.

  8. Coordinación de Vigilancia Epidemiológica/Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Sobrepeso y obesidad. Análisis 2019 y 2020 por OOAD. 2021.

  9. Rosado-Alcocer LM, Medina-Escobedo CE, Salcedo-Parra MA, Madera-Poot GJ, Gil-Contreras JA, Aguilar-Castillejos LF. Supervivencia del injerto y pacientes postrasplante renal de un hospital de Yucatán, México. Enferm Nefrol. 2022; 25 (2): 162-167.

  10. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H et al. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360 (5): 459-469.

  11. Machado S, Figueiredo N, Neves M, Macário F, Alves R, Mota A et al. Kidney transplantation using donors over 70 years old: are the criteria for organ allocation too expanded? Transplant Proc. 2012; 44 (8): 2289-2292.

  12. Burballa C, Crespo M, Redondo-Pachón D, Pérez-Sáez MJ, Arias-Cabrales C, Mir M et al. Factors associated with renal function compensation after donor nephrectomy. Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2018; 38 (5): 528-534. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2018.02.008.

  13. Marbun MB, Susalit E. Kidney hyperfiltration after nephrectomy: a mechanism to restore kidney function in living donors. Acta Med Indones. 2020; 52 (4): 413-419.

  14. Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, Adams PL, Alberú J, Bakr MA et al. KDIGO clinical practice guideline on the evaluation and care of living kidney donors. Transplantation. 2017; 101 (8S Suppl 1): S1-S109.

  15. van Londen M, Schaeffers AWMA, de Borst MH, Joles JA, Navis G, Lely AT. Overweight young female kidney donors have low renal functional reserve postdonation. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2018; 315 (3): F454-F459.

  16. Altheaby A, Alharbi N, Alzamil A, Alzahrani E, Alshaia AM, Aldowsary B et al. How does the remaining single kidney cope after contralateral nephrectomy of the kidney donor? A single-center cohort study. Cureus. 2020; 12 (11): e11491.

  17. Reese PP, Feldman HI, Asch DA, Thomasson A, Shults J, Bloom RD. Short-term outcomes for obese live kidney donors and their recipients. Transplantation. 2009; 88 (5): 662-671. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b27a17.

  18. Ibrahim HN, Murad DN, Hebert SA, Adrogue HE, Nguyen H, Nguyen DT et al. Intermediate renal outcomes, kidney failure, and mortality in obese kidney donors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32 (11): 2933-2947. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040548.

  19. Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN) and Spanish Transplant Organization (ONT). Recommendations for living-donor kidney transplantation. Nefrologia. 2010; 30: 1-105.

  20. Levea SL, Albin JL. Living kidney donation, obesity, and dietary change: investing in those who give the "gift of life". J Ren Nutr. 2022; 32 (3): 268-274.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Unidad de Trasplantes, Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad, Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional "Lic. Ignacio García Téllez", Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Mérida, Yucatán, México.



CORRESPONDENCE

Jorge Martínez-Ulloa Torres. E-mail: jorgemartinezu@imss.gob.mx




Received: Dec-12-2022. Accepted: Jul-17-2023

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Traspl. 2023;12