medigraphic.com
ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)

2023, Number 4

<< Back

Rev Mex Traspl 2023; 12 (4)

Bioethical perspectives of face transplantation

Palomares-Cantero JM

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 205-211
PDF size: 228.26 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This study addresses the topic of vascularized composite allotransplantation - facial transplantation from a bioethical perspective, with the aim of analyzing the ethical aspects that must be considered in this surgical technique. The methodology used consisted of a systematic review of scientific literature published in the last five years in different databases. A total of 21 articles were analyzed, which approached the topic from a bioethical perspective. The keywords used were facial transplantation, vascularized composite allotransplantation, bioethics, medical ethics, informed consent, and identity. The results obtained indicate that facial transplantation raises various ethical dilemmas, including informed consent, patient's identity and autonomy, distributive justice, and the relationship between the donor and the recipient. It was also found that social opinion and the opinions of healthcare experts on facial transplantation also influence its acceptance and application. The most relevant conclusions of the study point out that facial transplantation is a complex surgical technique that requires a thorough evaluation of the ethical aspects that must be considered. The implementation of protocols and ethical guidelines is recommended to guide decisions regarding patient selection and informed consent in an assertive manner. Furthermore, the importance of promoting ethical discussion and reflection on facial transplantation to improve its acceptance and application in society is highlighted. In summary, this study provides a critical and reflective perspective on facial transplantation in Mexico from a bioethical standpoint and suggests the need to further delve into this area to enhance its clinical and social practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Johnson RM, Lohse CM, Zins JE, Siemionow M. Five-year outcomes after facial transplantation: The Mayo Clinic experience. American Journal of Transplantation. 2018; 18 (10): 2473-2482.

  2. Hernández-Pérez H, Hernández-González A. Bioética y trasplante hepático en México. Medicina y Ética. 2021; 42 (2): 178-190. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.19137/medet-2021-0201

  3. Siemionow M, Papay F. Indications and contraindications for facial transplantation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 144 (2): 438-446.

  4. Aberdeen AH. Artículo de investigación documental sobre trasplantes de útero, utilizando órganos de donantes fallecidas: una revisión hasta 2021. Medicina y Ética. 2022; 33 (4): 959-1003. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.36105/mye.2022v33n4.01

  5. Rizzo S, Di Pietro V, Ardito F, Colucci R, Tartaro G, Santagati G, Gherardini G. Facial transplantation: a new therapeutic option for patients with complex craniofacial defects. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2022; 33 (1): 28-32.

  6. Páez MR. Conflictos de interés en la distribución de recursos en salud. Medicina y Ética. 2020; 31(3): 627-676. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.36105/mye.2020v31n3.04

  7. Tamayo CID, Martínez RBA, Rodríguez MTB. La ética en las donaciones y trasplantes de órganos. Presentación en cibamanz. 2021.

  8. Navigante AH, Pierobon M, Buss P. Informed consent in organ donation and transplantation: an integrative review. Transplantation. 2021; 105 (8): e113-e124.

  9. Andrews B. Facial transplantation and the ethics of risk. Bioethics. 2019; 33 (2): 216-222. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12599

  10. Méndez J, Nieto-Fernández D, Erazo-Arteaga MC et al. Trasplante facial generalidades. Médicas UIS. 2020; 33 (3): 29-36.

  11. Furr AK, Siemionow M. Psychological and psychiatric considerations in facial transplantation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2021; 147 (1): 225-232. Available in: https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007828

  12. Farías-Yapur A, Iglesias M, González-Chávez A, Cantú-Quintanilla G. A multisystemic approach to psychosocial evaluations of vascularized composite allotransplantation candidates. Current Transplantation Reports. 2020; 7: 237-245. doi: 10.1007/s40472-020-00294-7.

  13. McAdams-DeMarco MA, James NT. Psychosocial factors and organ transplantation outcomes. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 2021; 26 (3): 278-282.

  14. Furr AK, Fischer AC, Pomahac B. Donor selection for face transplantation. JAMA facial plastic surgery. 2019; 21 (3): 194-195.

  15. Ruiz MA. Alotransplante de tejido compuesto: bases anatómico-experimentales y aplicación a nuevos modelos de conocimiento para reconstrucción de extremidades superiores. Cirugía Plástica Ibero-Latinoamericana. 2019; 45 (2): 171-178.

  16. Lafferrière JN. El Covid-19, la bioética y los derechos humanos: principios y cuestiones en juego. [En línea] 2020.

  17. Novitzky D, O'Brien TS, Adams P, Kahn D. Facial transplantation and the ethics of identity. AMA Journal of Ethics. 2018; 20 (2): 171-179.

  18. Mendoza Ruelas VJ. Aspectos filosóficos y sociales del trasplante de órganos. Derecho Global. Estudios sobre derecho y justicia, 2022; 7 (21): 285-291.

  19. Pascalev A, Georgieva M. Ethical and psychological issues in facial transplantation: a review of the literature. Annals of Transplantation. 2020; 25, e920196-1-e920196-9.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com