medigraphic.com
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Pediatría

2023, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Acta Pediatr Mex 2023; 44 (5)

Munchausen by proxy: Experience of a pediatric tertiary care hospital in Mexico

Vélez OA, García PCA, Argüelles AP, Solís IP

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 353-364
PDF size: 227.95 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Munchausen by proxy constitutes a form of child abuse in which the people in charge of caring for a child or adolescent (Children or Adolescents), usually the mother, exaggerate the symptoms of an existing illness, invent stories, falsify symptoms or alter studies. It is usually difficult to detect, patients are subjected to a series of unnecessary and potentially harmful studies, procedures and treatments.
Objective: Identify the characteristics of patients with Munchausen by proxy, the most frequent symptoms and pathologies and the characteristics of the main caregiver.
Materials and Methods: An observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out on the cases treated over a period of 6 years at the Clinic for Comprehensive Care of Abused Children (CAINM) of the National Institute of Pediatrics.
Results: Of the cases studied, there were no differences in terms of gender, the usual presentation was with an average of 5 years, in relation to the clinical characteristics, mixed symptoms predominated, characterized by respiratory, gastrointestinal and hematological conditions. In relation to family characteristics, the mother was the main caregiver.
Conclusion: This is an entity that is difficult to detect, due to the variability of the clinical picture, it occurs in the medical field, which leads the doctor to perpetuate the cycle and possible damage. Being familiar with this condition helps to suspect and channel cases in a timely manner.


REFERENCES

  1. Ali-Panzarella AZ, Bryant TJ, Marcovitch H, Lewis JD. MedicalChild Abuse Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: MultidisciplinaryApproach from a Pediatric GastroenterologyPerspective. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Apr;19(4):14.doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0553-1. PMID: 28374307.

  2. Asher R. Munchausen's syndrome. Lancet. 1951 Feb10;1(6650):339-41. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(51)92313-6.

  3. Scully A, Small A, West A, Bachim A. Medical Child Abuseor Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. In: Maldonado-Duran,J.M., Jimenez-Gomez, A., Saxena, K. (eds) Handbook ofMind/Body Integration in Child and Adolescent Development.Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-18377-5_10

  4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statisticalmanual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: AmericanPsychiatric Publishing; 2013. p. 324–6

  5. Mayo Clinic. Trastorno Facticio 2017. https://www.mayoclinic.org/es-es/diseases-conditions/factitious-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20356028

  6. Lauren B D, Faust J, Ryan A, Black D, Alexander A. Personalityprofiles of factitious disorder imposed by mothers:A comparative analysis. Journal of Child Custody. 2017;14: 191-208

  7. APSAC Taskforce. Munchausen by Proxy: Clinical andCase Management Guidance. Am Prof Soc Abus Child.2017;1-29.

  8. The American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children.Munchausen by proxy: Clinical and case managementguidance. APSAC Advisor 2018.

  9. Rosenberg DA. Web of deceit: a literature review ofMunchausen syndrome by proxy. Child Abuse Negl. 1987;11:547-563.

  10. Rosenberg DA. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: medicaldiagnostic criteria. Child Abuse Negl. 2003;27:421–430

  11. Roesler TA, Carole-Jenny,. Medical Child Abuse:beyod Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. AmericanAcademy of Pediatrics. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1542/9781581105131

  12. Lovaglio, G. S. y Del Bagge, P. Síndrome de Münchausenpor poderes. Alto riesgo para la vida de niños, niñas yadolescentes. Revista de Psicología. 2021; 2: 123–138

  13. Yates GP, Feldman MD. Factitious disorder: A systematicreview of 455 cases in the professional literature. Gen HospPsychiatry. 2016;41:20-8.

  14. Comas J.R. V V. Síndrome de Munchausen: cuadro clínico,diagnóstico diferencial y una propuesta de tratamiento.Rev Fac Med UNAM. 2005;48.

  15. Gregory P, Yates GP, Marc D. Feldman MD, Factitious disorder:a systematic review of 455 cases in the professionalliteratura. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2016; 41: 20–28

  16. García Losa E. Trastorno Facticio, simulación, engancheterapéutico dependencial y apego, en la Unidad de SaludMental: Las personalidades subyacentes y la problemáticaasociada. https://psiquiatria.com/trabajos/188.pdf Revisadoen enero 2022

  17. Lanzarone A, Nardello R, Conti E, Zerbo S, Argo A. Childabuse in a medical setting: Case illustrations of two variantsof munchausen sindrome by proxy. Euro Mediterranean Biomed J. 2017;12(10):47-50.

  18. Goldfarb J. A Physician’s Perspective On Dealing withCases of Munchausen by Proxy. Clin Pediatr (Phila).

  19. 1998;37(3):187-919. Gomes G. T, Germano M. María Eduarda. Síndrome deMunchausen by proxy: definición, contextualización y factorespsíquicos involucrados. Revista de Psicología (PUCP).

  20. 2014; 32(1):139-15620. Morrell MS, Scott Tilley D. The Role of Nonperpetrating Fathersin Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: A Review of theLiterature. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 2012; 27:328-35.

  21. L. de Ugarte Moreno C. Trastorno facticio con síntomaspsicológicos. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. ¿Es útil la confrontación?Acta Esp Psiquiatr. 2009;37:57-59

  22. Bass C, Halligan P: Factitious disorders and malingering:challenges for clinical assessment and management. Lancet.2014;383:1422-1432.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com