medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2023, Number 3

Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2023; 5 (3)

Artificial intelligence as a co-pilot in case design, experiences in two Latin American simulation centers

Rodríguez A, Sambuceti C, Gaitán MH, Díaz-Guio DA

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 91-95
PDF size: 264.99 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), including GPT4 model has arrived to stay in the field of general education and health sciences education in particular, simulation-based education is no exception. In the present work, we show the application of GPT4 in the construction of simulation cases from the experience of two Latin American simulation centers. We propose some recommendations for effective instruction, show some results as examples, and discuss some difficulties and limitations in its use.


REFERENCES

  1. Ouyang F, Jiao P. Artificial intelligence in education: the three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2021; 2: 100020.

  2. Haenlein M, Kaplan A. A brief history of artificial intelligence: on the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif Manage Rev. 2019; 61 (4): 5-14.

  3. Tolsgaard MG, Pusic MV, Sebok-Syer SS, Gin B, Svendsen MB, Syer MD, et al. The fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 156. Med Teach. 2023; 45 (6): 565-573.

  4. Moor M, Banerjee O, Abad ZSH, Krumholz HM, Leskovec J, Topol EJ et al. Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence. Nature. 2023; 616 (7956): 259-265.

  5. Díaz-Guio DA, Henao J, Pantoja A, Arango MA, Díaz-Gómez AS, Camps Gómez A. Artificial intelligence, applications and challenges in simulation-based education. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2024;52:e1085

  6. Khanna A, Pandey B, Vashishta K, Kalia K, Pradeepkumar B, Das T. A study of today's A.I. through chatbots and rediscovery of machine intelligence. International Journal of u- and e-Service, Science and Technology. 2015; 8 (7): 277-284.

  7. Adamopoulou E, Moussiades L. An overview of chatbot technology. Vol. 584 IFIP, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 373-383.

  8. Alser M, Waisberg E. Concerns with the usage of ChatGPT in Academia and Medicine: a viewpoint. Am J Med Open. 2023; 9: 100036.

  9. Halaweh M. ChatGPT in education: strategies for responsible implementation. Cont Ed Technology. 2023; 15: 421.

  10. Moldt JA, Festl-Wietek T, Madany Mamlouk A, Nieselt K, Fuhl W, Herrmann-Werner A. Chatbots for future docs: exploring medical students' attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Med Educ Online. 2023; 28 (1): 2182659.

  11. Lim WM, Gunasekara A, Pallant JL, Pallant JI, Pechenkina E. Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarok or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. Int J Manag Educ. 2023; 21 (2): 1-13.

  12. Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar AK, et al. So what if ChatGPT wrote it?" Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. Int J Inf Manage. 2023; 71: 102642.

  13. Alkaissi H, McFarlane SI. Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing. Cureus. 2023; 15 (2): e35179.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com