medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2023, Number 3

<< Back

Simulación Clínica 2023; 5 (3)

Artificial intelligence in medical simulation: current state and future outlook

Selman-Álvarez R, Figueroa-Fernández Ú, Cruz-Mackenna E, Jarry C, Escalona G, Corvetto M, Varas-Cohen J

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 117-122
PDF size: 191.95 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This article explores the evolution and impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical simulation and surgical education. It highlights the consolidation of clinical simulation as an essential resource in contemporary medical training and examines how AI, through language models and advanced algorithms, is transforming feedback, personalizing teaching, and enhancing assessment in simulated and real environments. Ethical and operational challenges are addressed, such as academic dishonesty and the lack of coherence in AI-generated responses, and future directions are outlined, including personalized learning, advanced simulation, and interdisciplinary collaboration.


REFERENCES

  1. Varas J, Mejía R, Riquelme A, Maluenda F, Buckel E, Salinas J, et al. Significant transfer of surgical skills obtained with an advanced laparoscopic training program to a laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy in a live porcine model: feasibility of learning advanced laparoscopy in a general surgery residency. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2012; 26 (12): 3486-3494. Available in: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-012-2391-4

  2. Tejos R, Crovari F, Achurra P, Avila R, Inzunza M, Jarry C, et al. Video-based guided simulation without peer or expert feedback is not enough: a randomized controlled trial of simulation-based training for medical students. World J Surg [Internet]. 2021; 45 (1): 57-65. Available in: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00268-020-05766-x

  3. Belmar F, Gaete MI, Durán V, Chelebifski S, Jarry C, Ortiz C, et al. Taking advantage of asynchronous digital feedback: development of an at-home basic suture skills training program for undergraduate medical students that facilitates skills retention. Glob Surg Educ - J Assoc Surg Educ [Internet]. 2023; 2 (1): 32. Available in: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s44186-023-00112-w

  4. Riviere E, Saucier D, Lafleur A, Lacasse M, Chiniara G. Twelve tips for efficient procedural simulation. Med Teach [Internet]. 2018; 40 (7): 743-751. Available in: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1391375

  5. Vera M, Kattan E, Cerda T, Niklitshek J, Montaña R, Varas J, et al. Implementation of distance-based simulation training programs for healthcare professionals: breaking barriers during COVID-19 pandemic. Simul Healthc [Internet]. 2021; 16 (6): 401-406. Available in: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000550

  6. Villagrán I, Rammsy F, Del Valle J, Gregorio De Las Heras S, Pozo L, García P, et al. Remote, asynchronous training and feedback enables development of neurodynamic skills in physiotherapy students. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2023; 23 (1): 267. Available in: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-023-04229-w

  7. Quezada J, Achurra P, Jarry C, Asbun D, Tejos R, Inzunza M, et al. Minimally invasive tele-mentoring opportunity—the mito project. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2020; 34 (6): 2585-2592. Available in: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-07024-1

  8. Abd-alrazaq A, AlSaad R, Alhuwail D, Ahmed A, Healy PM, Latifi S, et al. Large language models in medical education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Med Educ [Internet]. 2023; 9: e48291. Available in: https://mededu.jmir.org/2023/1/e48291

  9. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Rus D, Meireles OR. Artificial intelligence in surgery: promises and perils. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2018; 268 (1): 70-76. Available in: https://journals.lww.com/00000658-201807000-00013

  10. Varas J, Coronel BV, Villagrán I, Escalona G, Hernandez R, Schuit G, et al. Innovations in surgical training: exploring the role of artificial intelligence and large language models (LLM). Rev Col Bras Cir [Internet]. 2023; 50: e20233605. Available in: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912023000100402&tlng=en

  11. Henderson M, Ryan T, Boud D, Dawson P, Phillips M, Molloy E, et al. The usefulness of feedback. Act Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2021; 22 (3): 229-243. Available in: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1469787419872393

  12. Solano QP, Hayward L, Chopra Z, Quanstrom K, Kendrick D, Abbott KL, et al. Natural language processing and assessment of resident feedback quality. J Surg Educ [Internet]. 2021; 78 (6): e72-e77. Available in: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1931720421001537

  13. Dogan ME, Goru Dogan T, Bozkurt A. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in online learning and distance education processes: a systematic review of empirical studies. Appl Sci [Internet]. 2023; 13 (5): 3056. Available in: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/5/3056

  14. Belmar F, Gaete MI, Escalona G, Carnier M, Durán V, Villagrán I, et al. Artificial intelligence in laparoscopic simulation: a promising future for large-scale automated evaluations. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2023; 37 (6): 4942-4946. Available in: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-022-09576-1

  15. Kitamura FC. ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology [Internet]. 2023; 307 (2): e230171. Available in: http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230171

  16. Laplante S, Namazi B, Kiani P, Hashimoto DA, Alseidi A, Pasten M, et al. Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc [Internet]. 2023; 37 (3): 2260-2268. Available in: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-022-09439-9

  17. Ward TM, Mascagni P, Madani A, Padoy N, Perretta S, Hashimoto DA. Surgical data science and artificial intelligence for surgical education. J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2021; 124 (2): 221-230. Available in: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jso.26496

  18. Von Ende E, Ryan S, Crain MA, Makary MS. Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, and virtual reality advances and applications in interventional radiology. Diagnostics [Internet]. 2023; 13 (5): 892. Available in: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/5/892

  19. Khan R, Plahouras J, Johnston BC, Scaffidi MA, Grover SC, Walsh CM. Virtual reality simulation training in endoscopy: a Cochrane review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy [Internet]. 2019; 51 (7): 653-664. Available in: http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-0894-4400

  20. Maier-Hein L, Eisenmann M, Sarikaya D, Marz K, Collins T, Malpani A, et al. Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation. Med Image Anal [Internet]. 2022; 76: 102306. Available in: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1361841521003510

  21. Kuhail MA, Alturki N, Alramlawi S, Alhejori K. Interacting with educational chatbots: a systematic review. Educ Inf Technol [Internet]. 2023; 28 (1): 973-1018. Available in: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3

  22. Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, Bozkurt A, Hickey DT, Huang R, et al. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn Environ [Internet]. 2023; 10 (1): 15. Available in: https://slejournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

  23. Ahmed A, Ali N, Alzubaidi M, Zaghouani W, Abd-alrazaq AA, Househ M. Freely available Arabic corpora: a scoping review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update [Internet]. 2022; 2: 100049. Available in: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666990022000015




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com