medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2022; 59 (1)

A comprehensive approach to the diagnosis of the maxillomandibular skeletal pattern, body posture and craniocervical position

Jiménez YY, Machado CM, Véliz COL, Barreto FEE, Jiménez MLM

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 409.18 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Head and neck biomechanical principles are particularly relevant in the fields of orthodontics and dentomaxillofacial orthopedics. Any anomaly should be analyzed and treated within the cranio-cervical-mandibular system applying a comprehensive approach.
Objective: Describe the relationship between the sagittal maxillomandibular skeletal pattern, body posture and craniocervical position in adolescents.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2018 to June 2019. The study sample was 105 adolescents attending seventh grade at Eduardo Anoceto Rega junior high school in Santa Clara. Determination was made of maxillomandibular skeletal patterns Classes I, II and III, measuring the facial convexity in Ricketts' cephalograms, craniocervical extension, normal inclination and flexion positions with Rocabado's cephalogram, and posture type with Bricot's method. Ethical standards were complied with. Use was made of the statistical tests chi-square, Fisher's F and Welch's.
Results: Posture D (flat back and anterior scapular plane) prevailed in all skeletal classes: 64.76% of the adolescents, followed by posture C (posterior scapular plane). In Class II, posture D was followed by posture B (scapular and gluteal plane aligned with increased anterior curves): 6.22%. A predominance was observed of craniocervical normal inclination: 46.67% and flexion: 42.86%. In Class III, Rocabado's flexion and posteroinferior angle were more common than the remaining 107º skeletal classes.
Conclusions: Cranial position with respect to cervical structures, according to the characteristics of each skeletal class, may be an important indicator in morphological diagnosis. Despite the large number of studies conducted in this field, consensus has not been achieved about the degree of relationship between craniocervical posture and malocclusions.


REFERENCES

  1. Di Rocas S. Rehabilitación miofuncional postural (RMP). Método Di Rocca. Protocolo Interdisciplinario Integrado. Italia: Cavinato Editore Internacinal; 2014 [acceso: 24/01/2017]. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://books.google.com.cu/books/about/R_M_P_rehabilitacion_miofuncional_postur.html?id=_E5DDAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

  2. Carini F, Mazzola M, Fici Ch, Palmeri S, Messina M, Palmeri S, Messina M, Damiani P, et al. Posture and posturology, anatomical and physiological profiles: overview and current state of art. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(1):11-6. PMCID: PMC6166197

  3. González Rodríguez S, Llanes Rodríguez M, Fernández Pérez E, Pedroso Ramos L, Pérez Valerino M. Modificación de oclusión dentaria y postura cráneo-cervical en niños tratados con Activador abierto elástico. Rev Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odotopediatría. 2018 [acceso: 12/06/2020]; art-20. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2018/art-20/

  4. Machado Martínez M, Cabrera García K, Martínez Bermúdez GR. Postura craneocervical como factor de riesgo en la maloclusión. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2017 [acceso: 18/06/2020]; 54(1):24-33. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.revestomatologia.sld.cu/index.php/est/issue/view/22

  5. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KW, Huang GL. Diagnosis and therapeutic planning. In: Orthodontics current principles and techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.p. 3-98.

  6. Kamal A, Fida M. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with twin-block appliances: A retrospective cohort study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 [acceso: 01/08/2020]; 155(5):656-61 Disponible en: Disponible en: https://ecommons.aku.edu/pakistan_fhs_mc_surg_dent_oral_maxillofac/108

  7. Espósito GM, Meersseman JP. Evaluación de la relación existente entre la oclusión y la postura. Rev Dent Modern. 1988 [acceso: 14/05/2015]. 6(5). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.sekmo.es/sekmo/Publicaciones/Monografias/evaluaciondelarelacionexistenteentrelaoclusionylapostura.pdf

  8. Domínguez B, Siso Sh. Asociación de la postura y maloclusiones dentales en los pacientes adolescentes del Instituto Mexicano de Ortodoncia. Rev Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Odoentopediatría. 2019 [acceso: 12/06/2020]; art-2. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2019/art-2/

  9. Castellano M, Lilli C, Barbato E, Santilli V,Galluccio G. Craniofacial asymmetry in non- syndromic orthodontic subjects: clinical and postural evaluation. CRANIO. 2016;34(3):144-154. PMID: 25845524

  10. Bernal LV, Marin H, Herrera CP, Montoya C, Herrera YU. Craniocervical Posture in Children with Class I, II and III Skeletal Relationships. Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada. 2017;17(1):e3038. DOI: 10.4034/PBOCI.2017.171.07

  11. Rodríguez Gomes RG, Dias B, Souza I, Fontes Baptista A, Dubois Mendes SM, Coelho-Neto JÁ, et al. Associação do Apoio Plantar com Desvios do Tronco no Plano Sagital. Rev Pesqui em Fisioter. 2011 [acceso: 12/08/2020]; 1(1):57-66 Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www5.bahiana.edu.br/index.php/fisioterapia/article/view/76/93

  12. Jiménez Yong Y. Relación de las anomalías dentomaxilo-faciales sagitales con la postura corporal y el apoyo plantar. Rev.Med.Electrón. 2018 [acceso: 04/09/2018]; 40(3):602-14. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.revmedicaelectronica.sld.cu/index.php/rme/article/view/2347/3853

  13. Henríquez J, Fuentes R, Sandoval P Muñoz A. Análisis de la estabilidad ortostática craneocervical en adultos jóvenes mapuches . Int. J. Morphol. 2003;21(2):149-53. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022003000200009

  14. Bricot B. Postura normal y posturas patológicas. Rev IPP. 2008 [acceso: 08/01/2016]; 1(2). Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.ub.edu/revistaipp/bricot_n2.html

  15. García N, Sanhueza A, Cantín M, Fuentes R. Evaluation of Cervical Posture of Adolescent Subjects in Skeletal Class I, II, and III. Int. J. Morphol. 2012;30(2):405-10. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022012000200007&lng=es

  16. Guaglio G. Ortodonzia dinámica e ripristino delle funzioni. Italia: Euroedizioni; 2013.

  17. León Valencia J. Posición del hioides, postura craneocervical y dimensión de las vías aéreas en sujetos con clase III esquelética. [Tesis Máster de Ciencias Odontológicas]. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2016 [acceso: 26/02/2018]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://eprints.ucm.es/37273/

  18. Thurow R. Infraestructura funcional. En: Atlas de Principios ortodóncicos.Ciudad de La Habana: Editorial Científico-Técnica; 1995. p. 24-49.

  19. Cárdenas MJ, Flores Flores JC, Gutiérrez Cantú FJ, Cárdenas MG, Sánchez Meraz W, et al. Estudio morfométrico de la posición cráneo-cervical en pacientes con clases esqueletales II y III. Int J Morphol. 2015;33(2):415-19. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022015000200001

  20. Aranitasi L, Tarazona B, Zamora N. Influence of skeletal class in the morphology of cervical vertebrae: A study using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthodontist. 2017;87(1):131-7. DOI: 10.2319/041416-307.1




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com