medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Archivos de Neurociencias

Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2023, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Arch Neurocien 2023; 28 (3)

Bilateral decompressive craniectomy in a patient with head injuries caused by gun projectile: a case report

Riley-Moguel ÁE, Carrera-Salas C, Cortés-Monterrubio RA, Vichi-Ramírez MM, Marín-Márquez G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 44-48
PDF size: 242.55 Kb.


Key words:

bilateral decompressive craniectomy, hinge/floating craniotomy, gunshot wounds, case report.

ABSTRACT

A 38-year-old male patient sustained multiple skull injuries from a small-caliber firearm projectile, which entered through the right eye after being attacked outside his residence. As a result, he suffered head trauma with multifragmented cranial vault fracture causing exposure of the brain mass in the bilateral frontoparietal region, and complete injury to the right eyeball with fractures involving the posterior, lateral, medial walls, roof and floor walls of the orbit. The patient was transferred to the General Hospital of Axapusco, where he presented with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8. An initial skull tomography revealed injuries to both hemispheres, bilateral subarachnoid hemorrhage, parasagittal hemorrhagic contusions and cerebral edema, primarily affecting the corpus callosum and cingulum. Consequently, surgical intervention in the form of a hinge-type decompressive craniectomy and debridement was performed within the first 12 hours of trauma. It is worth noting that the patient’s recovery was favorable and without associated complications. In conclusion, early decompressive craniectomy is the preferred surgical treatment when a patient presents with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of less than 9 upon admission, exhibits bihemispheric and posterior fossa injuries along the wound trajectory, undergoes surgery within the first 12 hours following the injury, displays pupillary reactivity, and is older than 35 years of age.


REFERENCES

  1. Haoyi Qi, Kunzheng Li. Civilian gunshot wounds to the head:a case report, clinical management, and literature review. ChinNeurosurg J. 2021;7(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41016-020-00227-9

  2. Tunthanathip T, Udomwitthayaphiban S. Developmentand validation of a nomogram for predicting the mortalityafter penetrating traumatic brain injury. Bull EmergTrauma. 2019; 7(4):347-54. doi:10.29252/beat-070402

  3. Lin DJ, Lam FC, Siracuse JJ, Thomas A, Kasper EM. “Time isbrain” the Gifford factor - or: Why do some civilian gunshotwounds to the head do unexpectedly well? A case serieswith outcomes analysis and a management guide. SurgNeurol Int. 2012;3:98. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.100187

  4. Fahde Y, Laghmari M, Skoumi M. Penetrating headtrauma: 03 rare cases and literature review. Pan Afr Med J.2017;28:305. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.305.10376

  5. Castillo-Rangel C, Salinas-Velázquez O, Gomez-Ibarra A, Becerra-Escobedo G, Pérez VH, Marín-Márquez G. Report of an epicranialarteriovenous malformation. Cesk Slov Neurol. 2021;84:488-90.

  6. Castillo-Rangel C, Marín G, Hernandez-Contreras KA, Zarate-Calderon C, Vichi-Ramirez MM, Cortez-Saldias W, et al.Atlas of nervous system vascular malformations: a systematicreview. Life. 2022;12(8):1199. doi: 10.3390/life12081199

  7. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Tajsic T, Adeleye A, Aklilu AT,Apriawan T, et al. Consensus statement from the InternationalConsensus Meeting on the Role of DecompressiveCraniectomy in the Management of Traumatic BrainInjury: Consensus statement. Acta Neurochir (Wien).2019;161(7):1261-74. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-03936-y

  8. Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Santos MT, Zanon-Collange N,Moraes OJ. Prognostic factors and treatment of penetratinggunshot wounds to the head. Surg Neurol. 2003;60:98-104.doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(03)00302-1

  9. Gressot LV, Chamoun RB, Patel AJ, Valadka AB, Suki D, RobertsonCS, et al. Predictors of outcome in civilians with gunshot woundsto the head upon presentation. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(3):645-52. doi: 10.3171/2014.5.JNS131872

  10. Rosenfeld JV, Bell RS, Armonda R. Current concepts in penetratingand blast injury to the central nervous system. World J Surg.2015;39(6):1352-62. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2874-7

  11. Qiu W, Guo C, Shen H, Chen K, Wen L, Huang H, et al. Effects ofunilateral decompressive craniectomy on patients with unilateralacute post-traumatic brain swelling after severe traumatic braininjury. CritCare. 2009;13(6):R185. doi: 10.1186/cc8178

  12. Grahm TW, Williams FC Jr, Harrington T, Spetzler RF.Civilian gunshot wounds to the head: a prospectivestudy. Neurosurgery. 1990;27(5):696-700. doi:10.1097/00006123-199011000-00005

  13. Joseph B, Aziz H, Pandit V, Kulvatunyou N, O’Keeffe T, Wynne J,et al. Improving survival rates after civilian gunshot wounds tothe brain. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.018

  14. Kazim SF, Shamim MS, Tahir MZ, Enam SA, Waheed S.Management of penetrating brain injury. J Emerg TraumaShock. 2011;4(3):395-402. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.83871

  15. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M,Timothy J, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumaticintracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1119-30.doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1605215




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Arch Neurocien. 2023;28