Rojas LM, López VN, González VA, Bizarro NP, Cervantes VME, Casarrubias TB, Fortoul TI

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 8-16
PDF size: 311.30 Kb.

ABSTRACT

It is estimated that the human body is made of trillions of cells, which suffer hundreds of thousands of DNA lesions every day. Although DNA is not the only biomolecule that suffers damage, its importance lies in the fact that it is the only biomolecule that cannot be replaced by the cell, so when it suffers damage, the cell must repair it, tolerate or, in a extreme case, activate pathways that will lead to death, since the objective is to maintain cell integrity and the homeostasis of the organism.There are thousands of agents that can damage DNA, some are produced by the cell and are called ‘endogenous, while others are external agents and are known as ‘exogenous. The cell cannot avoid the damage caused by endogenous agents, since they are products of its metabolic activity, for example, so when they occur, cellular mechanisms are immediately activated to mitigate them. The same happens with the damage caused by exogenous agents, since the cell will do everything possible to diminish the adverse effects they can cause. The problem becomes apparent when the cell is unable to repair the damage or poorly repairs it, or repairs so much that the mechanisms are overwhelmed, when the damage remains in the DNA and a state of chromosomal instability is generated that can lead the cell to dysfunction and malignization. This state of chromosomal instability can be reflected in increased DNA breaks or micronuclei in exposed cells, which can be quantified by special methods such as the ‘Comet Assay’ and the ‘Micronucleus Assay’. Since identifying DNA damage is a way of evaluating the toxic potential of the agents to which populations are exposed, it allows us to know their mechanisms of action and helps to understand the factors that influence the detriment in population’s health.

REFERENCES

1. Chatterjee N, Walker GC. Mechanisms of DNA damage,repair, and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017;58(5):235-263.

2. Jackson PS, Bartek J. The DNA-damage response inhuman biology and disease. Nature. 2009;22(461):1071-1078.

3. Yousefzadeh M, Henpita C, Soto-Palma C, Robbins P,Niedernhofer L. (2021). DNA damage—how and whywe age? eLife. 2021;10:e62852.

4. Gupta RC, Lutz WK. Background DNA damage for endogenousand unavoidable exogenous carcinogens: a basisfor spontaneous cancer incidence? Mutat Res. 1999;424(1-2):1-8.

5. Dizdaroglu M, Jaruga P. Mechanisms of free radical-induceddamage to DNA. Free Radic Res. 2012;46(4):382-419.

6. Rahimian E, Amini A, Alikarami F, Pezeshki SMS, SakiN, Safa M. DNA repair pathways as guardians of thegenome: Therapeutic potential and possible prognosticrole in hematologic neoplasms. DNA Repair (Amst).2020;96:102951.

7. Araldi RP, de Melo TC, Mendes TB, de Sá Júnior PL,Nozima BH, Ito ET, de Carvalho RF, de Souza EB, deCassia Stocco R. Using the comet and micronucleus assaysfor genotoxicity studies: A review. Biomed Pharmacother.2015;72:74-82.

8. Singh NP, McCoy MT, Tice RR, Schneider EL. A simpletechnique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage inindividual cells. Exp Cell Res. 1988;175(1):184-91.

9. Jain AK, Pandey AK. In Vivo Micronucleus Assay in MouseBone Marrow. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;2031:135-146.