medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2024; 22 (1)

Monitoring of neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium in priming dose versus single dose in patients undergoing general anesthesia at Hospital Angeles Pedregal. Controlled clinical trial

Mancera RMI, Hernández RD, Bracho BE, Portela OJM, García HLA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/114591

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/114591
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/114591

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 34-39
PDF size: 156.25 Kb.


Key words:

priming, rocuronium, neuromuscular blocker, train-of-four monitoring.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: there are currently various neuromuscular blockers for intubation; one of them, succinylcholine, which, although it has a rapid onset of action, its adverse effects have favored the use of other NMBs such as rocuronium. Current options to minimize intubation times include the use of priming or priming. Material and methods: fifty patients under general anesthesia for orthopedic or abdominal surgery at Hospital Angeles Pedregal were studied. They were randomized into two groups (experimental and control). The control group received a rapid sequence induction dose of rocuronium and the experimental group a priming dose. Time to TOF of 0 and NMB recovery were measured. Descriptive statistics were performed using frequencies and percentages for nominal variables and measures of central tendency for quantitative variables depending on the distribution of the data. The comparison between groups was using χ2 and Student's t or Mann-Whitney U. Results: both groups were homogeneous for the epidemiological variables. When comparing the experimental group against the control group, the time to achieve the TOF of 0 was greater in the experimental group (123 vs 96 seconds, p = 0.030). On the other hand, pharmacological reversal with sugammadex was observed with the same frequency in both groups. Conclusions: in this trial, we concluded that the time to reach TOF of 0 was longer for the priming group. However, it is important to mention that the time needed for TOF of 0 with doses of 0.6 mg/kg without priming reaches up to four minutes; while in the study we observed that when priming with a dose of 0.6 mg/kg it can be reduced to 123 seconds.


REFERENCES

  1. Dong J, Gao L, Lu W, Xu Z, Zheng J. Pharmacological interventions for acceleration of the onset time of rocuronium: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9 (12): e114231.

  2. Tran DT, Newton EK, Mount VA, Lee JS, Mansour C, Wells GA et al. Rocuronium vs. succinylcholine for rapid sequence intubation: a Cochrane systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2017; 72 (6): 765-777.

  3. Naguib M, Samarkandi AH, El-Din ME, Abdullah K, Khaled M, Alharby SW. The dose of succinylcholine required for excellent endotracheal intubating conditions. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102 (1): 151-155.

  4. Huang L, Sang CN, Desai MS. A Chronology for the identification and disclosure of adverse effects of succinylcholine. J Anesth Hist. 2019; 5 (3): 65-84.

  5. Czarnetzki C, Albrecht E, Masouyé P, Baeriswyl M, Poncet A, Robin M et al. Rapid sequence induction with a standard intubation dose of rocuronium after magnesium pretreatment compared with succinylcholine: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2021; 133 (6): 1540-1549.

  6. Fabregat López J, Candia Arana CA, Castillo Monzón CG. La monitorización neuromuscular y su importancia en el uso de los bloqueantes neuromusculares. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012; 40 (4): 293-303.

  7. Veiga Ruiz G, García Cayuela J, Orozco Montes J, Parreño Caparrós M, García Rojo B, Aguayo Albasini JL. Monitorización intraoperatoria del bloqueo neuromuscular y la presión arterial con un solo dispositivo (TOF-cuff): estudio comparativo con la mecanomiografía y la presión arterial invasiva. Revista Española de Anestesiología y Reanimación. 2017; 64 (10): 560-567.

  8. Wardhana A, Kurniawaty J, Uyun Y. Optimised reversal without train-of-four monitoring versus reversal using quantitative train-of-four monitoring: An equivalence study. Indian J Anaesth. 2019; 63 (5): 361-367.

  9. Alenezi FK, Alnababtah K, Alqahtani MM, Olayan L, Alharbi M. The association between residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) and critical respiratory events: a prospective cohort study. Perioper Med (Lond). 2021; 10 (1): 14.

  10. Thilen SR, Weigel WA, Todd MM, Dutton RP, Lien CA, Grant SA et al. 2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Monitoring and Antagonism of Neuromuscular Blockade: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesthesiology. 2023; 138 (1): 13-41.

  11. Steinberg D. Relajantes musculares: periodo de comienzo bifásico. Vecuronio: bolo y cebado. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2005; 33 (2): 107-113.

  12. Sosa F, Tomas F, Urioste G, Xavier S, Bouchacourt JP. Evaluación del rocuronio en la práctica clínica. Anest Analg Reanim. 2014; 27 (2): 1-9.

  13. Ficha técnica rocuronio B. Braun 10 mg/ml, solución inyectable y para perfusión EFG. 2023.

  14. Aziz L, Jahangir SM, Choudhury SN, Rahman K, Ohta Y, Hirakawa M. The effect of priming with vecuronium and rocuronium on young and elderly patients. Anesth Analg. 1997; 85 (3): 663-666.

  15. Steinberg D. Rapacuronio - Rocuronio: cebado recíproco. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2002; 30 (4): 261-266.




Figure 1
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2024;22