2023, Number 2
Cir Card Mex 2023; 8 (2)
Confusion surrounding the Cox-maze procedure: a lack of standardization in daily practice
García-Villarreal OA
Language: English
References: 5
Page: 60-60
PDF size: 187.41 Kb.
ABSTRACT
I have carefully read the article by Mehaffey et al., which addresses the various reasons why the surgical ablation (SA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is currently underused during mitral valve surgery. The authors must be congratulated for this interesting work. However, beyond these true barriers that prevent the implementation of the concomitant SA for AF in daily practice, we must analyze the true causes that have given rise to this situation. Firstly, we must recognize that the only procedure that has proven to be highly effective in eliminating AF in the long term is the Cox-maze procedure (CMP), which remains as the gold standard for SA of AF. The CMP has been painstakingly described by Dr. Cox as a full bi-atrial lesion pattern procedure. All lesser procedures arising from the original CMP are associated with high failure rates after operation and should be avoided.REFERENCES
Je HG, Shuman DJ, Ad N. A systematic review of minimally invasive surgical treatmentfor atrial fibrillation: a comparison of the Cox-Maze procedure, beating-heartepicardial ablation, and the hybrid procedure on safety and efficacy. Eur J CardiothoracSurg. 2015;48:531-540; discussion 540-541. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu536.