medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2024, Number 02

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2024; 92 (02)

Acceptance and factors associated with modern post-abortion contraception in women treated in a public hospital

Falcón LB,Santos RYR, Campos CKE

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 41-51
PDF size: 214.87 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the frequency of acceptance and factors associated with modern postabortion contraception in patients attended at a public hospital in Peru.
Materials and Methods: Observational and cross-sectional study conducted in immediate postabortion patients attended from June to December 2022 at the Emergency Department of the Hospital San Juan de Lurigancho, Lima, Peru, selected by convenience. A validated questionnaire was used. Pearson's test χ2 was used with a significance level of 5%.
Results: We studied 166 patients in the immediate postabortion period, of whom 94% (n = 156) accepted some modern contraceptive method; the most common was the monthly injectable (44.0%) and the least accepted was the intrauterine device (0.6%). Personal factors associated with modern contraceptive method acceptance were age (p ‹ 0.01), no partner (p ‹ 0.001), and partner's agreement with the chosen contraceptive method (p ‹ 0.001). Associated institutional factors were agreeing with the time of family planning counseling (p = 0.047), considering the importance of privacy-confidentiality of counseling (p ‹ 0.001), and agreeing with the care offered during counseling (p = 0.026).
Conclusions: Age, lack of a partner, and agreeing with the partner about the choice of postabortion contraceptive method along with institutional factors (time of family planning counseling, importance of privacy-confidentiality, and perception of care in family planning counseling) were significantly associated with acceptance of some modern postabortion contraceptive method.


REFERENCES

  1. Hoffman B, Schorge JO, Schaffer JI, Halvorson LM, BradshawKD, Cunningham FG. Williams Ginecología. 2a ed. Ciudadde México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2024.

  2. Huber D, Curtis C, Irani L, Pappa S, Arrington L. PostabortionCare: 20 Years of Strong Evidence on Emergency Treatment,Family Planning, and Other Programming Components.Glob Health Sci Pract 2016;4(3): 481-94. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00052

  3. Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller AB, TunçalpÖ, Beavin C, et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortionby income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimatesfrom a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. TheLancet Global Health. 2020;8(9): e1152-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6

  4. PROMSEX. PROMSEX lanza nuevo estudio sobre aborto.https://promsex.org/el-aborto-en-cifras/>

  5. Juárez-Chávez E, Villalobos Ruiz JH, Carrasco NavarroRM, Guerrero Vásquez R, Chávez Alvarado SI. Exploringthe prevalence of abortion and its characteristics in Perú.Contraception. 2023;126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110115

  6. Abebe AM, Wudu Kassaw M, Estifanos Shewangashaw N.Postabortion Contraception Acceptance and AssociatedFactors in Dessie Health Center and Marie Stopes InternationalClinics, South Wollo Northeast, Amhara Region,2017. Int J Reprod Med 2019; 2019: 1-10. ID 1327351, 10páginas. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1327351

  7. Virk J, Zhang J, Olsen J. Medical Abortion and the Riskof Subsequent Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. N EnglJ Med 2007;357(7): 648-53. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa070445

  8. Magalona S, Byrne M, OlaOlorun FM, Mosso R, OmoluabiE, Moreau C, et al. Contraceptive Use Before and AfterAbortion: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nigeria and Côted’Ivoire. Studies in Family Planning 2022; 53 (3): 433-53.https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12208

  9. Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. PreventingUnintended Pregnancies by Providing No-Cost Contraception.Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120(6): 1291-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4000282/

  10. Federación Internacional de Ginecología y Obstetricia.Anticoncepción posaborto: anticonceptivos reversibles deacción prolongada. https://bitly.ws/XnIA>

  11. Schreiber CA, Sober S, Ratcliffe S, Creinin MD. Ovulationresumption after medical abortion with mifepristone andmisoprostol. Contraception 2011; 84 (3): 230-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.013

  12. Lencha TT, Gube AA, Gessese MM, Abadi MT. Post-abortionfamily planning utilization and associated factors in healthfacilities of Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia: Mixed study.PlosOne 2022; 17 (6): e0267545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267545

  13. Abebe BA, Abdissa G, Ganfure G, Mossisa M. PostabortionContraceptive Utilization, Preferences, and AssociatedFactors among Women Receiving Abortion CareServices in Health Facilities of Ambo Town, Ethiopia.Int J Reprod Med 2022; 2022:2681478. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2681478

  14. Benson J, Andersen K, Brahmi D, Healy J, Mark A, Ajode A,et al. What contraception do women use after abortion?An analysis of 319,385 cases from eight countries. GlobalPublic Health 2018; 13 (1): 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1174280

  15. Baynes C, Yegon E, Lusiola G, Achola J, Kahando R. Postabortionfertility desires, contraceptive uptake and unmetneed for family planning: voices of post-abortion careclients in Tanzania. J Biosocial Science 2021; 53 (6): 908-23.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932020000607

  16. Acre VN, Dijkerman S, Calhoun LM, Speizer IS, Poss C,Nyamato E. The association of quality contraceptive counselingmeasures with postabortion contraceptive methodacceptance and choice: results from client exit interviewsacross eight countries. BMC Health Services Research 2022;22 (1):1519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08851-0

  17. Sebazungu T, Ruzindana K, Kitessa D, Magriples U. FactorsAffecting Immediate Use of Contraception Among WomenHospitalised for Abortion in Two Public Hospitals in Kigali,Rwanda: A Cross Sectional Study. East Afr Health Res J 2023;7 (1): 2020-4. https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v7i1.704

  18. Veliz MV, Aquino NG, Robles V, Tasayco P, Pelaez A, BenitesY. Análisis de la situación de salud hospitalaria 2022. Lima,Perú: Hospital San Juan de Lurigancho; 2022. https://mail.hospitalsjl.gob.pe/ArchivosDescarga/Epidemiologia/ASIS/ASIS2022.pdf

  19. Guttmacher Institute. Guttmacher Institute. Embarazo noplaneado y aborto en América Latina y el Caribe. [en línea].https://www.guttmacher.org/es/fact-sheet/unintendedpregnancy-and-abortion-latin-america-and-caribbean

  20. Kayi EA, Biney AAE, Dodoo ND, Ofori CAE, Dodoo FNA.Women’s post-abortion contraceptive use: Are predictorsthe same for immediate and future uptake ofcontraception? Evidence from Ghana. PlosOne 2021;16 (12): e0261005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261005

  21. Asubiojo B, Ng’wamkai PE, Shayo BC, Mwangi R, MahandeMJ, Msuya SE, et al. Predictors and Barriers to Post AbortionFamily Planning Uptake in Hai District, Northern Tanzania:A Mixed Methods Study. EA Health Research Journal 2021;5 (2): 182-92. https://doi.org/10.24248/eahrj.v5i2.671

  22. Tong C, Luo Y, Li T. Factors Associated with the Choice ofContraceptive Method following an Induced Abortion afterReceiving PFPS Counseling among Women Aged 20–49Years in Hunan Province, China. Healthcare 2023; 11 (4):535. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040535

  23. Bizuneh AD, Azeze GG. Post-abortion family planning use,method preference, and its determinant factors in EasternAfrica: a systematic review and meta-analysis. SystematicReviews: 2021; 10 (1): 172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01731-4

  24. Hinkosa L, Deti M, Tesfaye T, Bekele D, Diriba A. Postabortioncontraceptives uptake and its associated factors amongclients visiting abortion care services in public hospitals inWest Shewa Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia, 2021.SAGE Open Medicine 2023; 11: 20503121231187735, 8páginas. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121231187735




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com