medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2022, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2022; 7 (4)

Quality of life after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary interventions compared with coronary bypass surgery

Espinoza-Hernández JD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 5
Page: 74-75
PDF size: 121.71 Kb.


Key words:

Coronary artery bypass grafting, Coronary artery disease, Percutaneous coronary intervention.

Text Extraction

The FAME 3 trial (Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) found that FFR guided PCI using current generation zotarolimus DES did not meet the criterion set for noninferiority about major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 1 year compared with CABG. In another publication, the same authors analyzed the quality of life of these patients at 12 months using three variables: quality of life, measured by European Quality of Life–5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), grade of angina by the Canadian Cardiovascular Class (CCS) and work status, this was assessed at baseline, one, six, and 12 months, with patients classified as working (full-time or part-time) or not working (due to retirement, health restriction or other reasons), with a pre-specified subgroup comparison for patients of working age, i.e., ‹65 years old at baseline. Their conclusion was in patients with 3V-CAD, quality of life and angina severity at 12 months are similar after FFR-guided PCI with current generation DES compared with CABG. FFR-guided PCI results in a faster improvement in quality of life than CABG during the first year after revascularization as was working status in those ‹ 65 years-old.


REFERENCES

  1. Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, De Bruyne B, et al; FAME 3 Investigators. FractionalFlow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery. NEngl J Med. 2022;386(2):128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299.

  2. Fearon WF, Zimmermann FM, Ding VY, et al; FAME 3 Investigators. Quality ofLife After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI Compared with Coronary BypassSurgery. Circulation. 2022;145(22):1655-1662. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.060049.

  3. Rodriguez A, Boullon F, Perez-Baliño N, Paviotti C, Liprandi MI, Palacios IF.Argentine randomized trial of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyversus coronary artery bypass surgery in multivessel disease (ERACI): in-hospitalresults and 1-year follow-up. ERACI Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(4):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90416-x.

  4. Cohen DJ, Van Hout B, Serruys PW, et al; Synergy between PCI with Taxus andCardiac Surgery Investigators. Quality of life after PCI with drug-eluting stentsor coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):1016-26. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1001508.

  5. Weintraub WS; Grau-Sepulveda MV; Weiss JM; O’Brien SM; Peterson ED, et.al.Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1467-76. Weintraub WS, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Weiss JM, et al. Comparativeeffectiveness of revascularization strategies. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(16):1467-76. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110717.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2022;7