medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2024; 9 (2)

Avoiding lethal mediastinal injuries, Steinmann nail migration

Cuevas-Álvarez, Roberto1,2; Martínez-Pérez, Alfredo M1,2; Echeverry-Gutiérrez, Miguel Ángel1,3; Villa-Meda, Francisco1,3; Álvarez-Moreno, Carolina1,2; Estrada-Castañeda, Haydee I1,2
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/115158

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/115158
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/115158

Language: English
References: 11
Page: 57-60
PDF size: 270.62 Kb.


Key words:

foreign body, lung, bronchus, bronchoscopy, Steinmann nail.

ABSTRACT

We present the case of a 29-year-old male, who was admitted with respiratory distress with unsatisfactory evolution. With the history and complementary studies, an intrapulmonary foreign body was diagnosed with involvement of the main bronchi. He underwent surgery, extracting a foreign body (Steinmann nail) in the upper lobe of the right lung. Because of its presentation, location and challenging treatment, the case is presented to show the most relevant clinic-surgical and pathological aspects.



INTRODUCTION

Bronchial foreign bodies in adult patients are a rare clinical entity in contrast to pediatric age.1 The initial aspiration is usually manifested by cough, dyspnea, asphyxia and/or cyanosis, although sometimes the clinical manifestations are not so striking and can go unnoticed or be confused with other pathologies such as bronchitis, bronchiectasis and pneumonia.2 In patients with a history of osteosynthesis, the risk of migration of the material exists and multiple cases have been described since 1943, some involving mediastinal structures with fatal outcomes.3 Our work aims to reflect the challenge involved in the diagnosis and treatment of an atypical cause of foreign body in the tracheobronchial area, with a clinical picture of cough and dyspnea in an adult patient, associated with a previous surgical intervention.



CLINICAL CASE

We present here the case of a 29-year-old male patient, who denies chronic degenerative diseases of importance, important surgical history about trochiter fracture and right shoulder dislocation in September 2022, managed conservatively; later with fracture displacement, being operated in March 2023. He was taken to his local General Hospital where closed reduction and immobilization were performed, with a review appointment at two months, where surgical management was decided, and he underwent surgery in March 2023, performing arthrodesis with placement of Steinmann nail. One month after surgery, he began with episodes of isolated chest pain, as well as non-productive cough and dyspnea of medium efforts, as well as gradual migration of the Steinmann nail. He went for follow-up evaluation and a control X-ray was performed, showing migration of the nail to the thorax, for which reason he was referred to our institution for evaluation by thoracic surgery.

Initial chest X-ray showed a metallic object in the thorax involving right and left hemithorax and mediastinum. There was no evidence of pleuropulmonary syndromes. Chest tomography demonstrated a metallic object in the thorax with involvement of the right lung which passes through the right main bronchus, carina, lodging in the left main bronchus (Figure 1).

The patient was admitted to the emergency room without dyspnea at rest or desaturation, hemodynamically stable. In the operating room, a bronchoscopy was performed in which a foreign body was observed in the right main bronchus passing through the carina and left main bronchus, without other apparent lesions (Figure 2). It was decided to perform a median sternotomy approach. Dissection of the superior cava, aorta and right pulmonary artery was performed to expose the trachea, site of perforation. Tracheal perforation closure is repaired with prolene. Right pleura was opened to remove the nail under direct vision by a counter opening in the right hemithorax. Right upper lobe exit orifice was repaired with absorbable suture. Adequate closure of the trachea was verified with a new perioperative bronchoscopy and two mediastinal tubes were placed. Conventional sternotomy closure was performed (Figure 3).

Patient with adequate postoperative evolution. Mediastinal tubes were removed on the fourth postoperative day and the patient was discharged from our institution (Figure 4).



COMMENT

Bronchial foreign bodies are an infrequent and occasional pathology in the adult population, as opposed to children. In Hollinger's classic 1978 study, only 6% of all airway foreign bodies occur in patients older than 14 years of age.4

If the foreign body is small and non-irritating, symptoms may be minimal, with an asymptomatic interval of hours, days or months, followed by chronic cough and increased secretions. Then, with local inflammatory reaction, erosion, perforation and infection, purulent or hemoptotic sputum, fever and prolonged or recurrent bronchopneumonia may occur.5

Regarding the location in the airway, most published series report the following locations according to frequency: right main bronchus (60-65%), left main bronchus (25-30%) and subglottic-trachea (9-12%). Distribution is similar to that found in pediatric age.6

Any undiagnosed bronchial foreign body will inexorably go through this period, which in turn goes through several states: a) the foreign body behaves as a bypass or free passage valve (bronchial pseudo asthma); b) as a one-way valve (air admission); c) as a total closure valve or airflow strangulation.7

This case described is an unusual bronchial foreign body presentation, which was secondary to migration of osteosynthesis material. Migration of nails and fixation wires is most likely to occur in the joints and bones of the rib cage, such as the clavicle, humerus, sternoclavicular joint, and acromioclavicular joint.8 Migration sites include the spinal canal, trachea, spleen, pulmonary artery, heart, mediastinum, lung, subclavian artery, and ascending and abdominal aorta.9

Several theories have been proposed to explain the migration of nails and fixation wires, including muscle activity, regional bone resorption, and the great freedom of motion of the shoulder. Muscle activity and regional bone resorption may cause nails and wires to break, which may facilitate their migration. The great freedom of motion of the shoulder may contribute to migration by allowing the nails and wires to move.9

Although bending the free end of the nails may help prevent migration, it is not always effective. The duration of device implantation is also a risk factor.9 It has been reported that nails and fixation wires can migrate from the site where they were placed, even up to six years later.10 Internal fixation devices should be removed at the appropriate time to avoid loosening, infection, or migration. The appropriate time to remove nails is when the fracture has healed, usually four to six weeks after placement. If a device breaks or changes position, it should be removed immediately.8

Symptoms may include chest pain, back pain and hemoptysis. Serious complications include perforation of major blood vessels, such as the innominate vein, ascending aorta, and superior vena cava, as well as pneumothorax.10

In 2015, 102 cases of fixation nails that moved to different parts of the mediastinum had been reported. Most of these cases occurred after fixation of trauma to the shoulder girdle. Eleven patients died due to severe cardiovascular complications, and 15 patients had aortic perforation, some of whom had cardiac tamponade resulting in the death of four patients.3

Treatment of choice, after a high clinical and radiological suspicion, consists of performing laryngoscopy or bronchoscopy, under maximum safety conditions and with minimal trauma. It is important to initially revise the upper esophagus and always be prepared for an emergency tracheotomy or cricothyrotomy, due to the possibility of the foreign body moving during the surgical procedure and producing a complete and fatal obstruction. When all these procedures are unsuccessful, the surgical approach should be resorted to either by thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracic surgery.11

Thoracoscopic removal of intrathoracic foreign bodies can be performed safely if it does not cross the mediastinum and if the patient can tolerate single-lung ventilation. Otherwise, thoracotomy and sternotomy (as in this case described) are safe and could be used to remove migrated nails. Sternotomy may be considered more appropriate in the presence of injury to the heart or great vessels.9



CONCLUSIONS

As a conclusion, migration of osteosynthesis material is a rare problem. Even so, several cases of migration to the thorax and mediastinum have been described in patients with joint fixation in the thoracic cage. Some of these cases have had fatal consequences. In our case, the factors contributing to the development of this complication were the prolonged time since fixation and the fact that the free end of the Steinmann nail had not been bent. This highlights the importance of close follow-up and fixation of the osteosynthesis material to avoid this type of complication. Fortunately, the patient presented image on radiography that allowed an integral approach, from the bronchoscopy to the surgical procedure, with adequate post-surgical evolution, achieving the extraction of the foreign object (Steinmann nail), without presenting lesions in adjacent structures, allowing a quick recovery and discharge.


REFERENCES

  1. Louie MC, Bradin S. Foreign body ingestion and aspiration. Pediatr Rev. 2009;30:295-301. doi: 10.1542/pir.30-8-295.

  2. Palmer-Becerra JD, Vania MC, Madriñan-Rivas JE. Extracción broncoscópica de cuerpos extraños en la vía aérea. Diez años de experiencia. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2010;31(3):102-107. doi: 180429299006.

  3. Custodio-López JJ, Ledesma-Martin CI. Migración de clavo de Steinmann hacia aorta descendente. Cir Cardiov. 2021;28(3):181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.circv.2020.10.003.

  4. Fernández Vega DM. Urgencias en Otorrinolaringología. Ponencia Oficial de la S.E.O.R.L. Madrid: Ed. Garsi S.A.; 1991. pp. 60-64.

  5. Swischuk LE. Emergency radiology of the acutely ill or injured child. USA: Williams & Wilkins Co.; 1979. pp. 91-96.

  6. Baharloo F, Veyckemans F, Francis C, Biettlot MP, Rodenstein DO. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: presentation and management in children and adults. Chest. 1999;115(5):1357-1362. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1357.

  7. Alvarado-León U, Palacios-Acosta JM, León-Hernández A. Cuerpos extraños alojados en las vías aérea y digestiva. Diagnóstico y tratamiento. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2011;32(2):93-100. doi: 423640328003.

  8. Kim JH, Kwon JH, Hwang ED, Yu JH. Intrathoracic migration of Steinmann pins. J Thorac Imaging. 2000;15(4):301-303. doi: 10.1097/00005382-200010000-00013.

  9. Sergides NN, Nikolopoulos DD, Yfadopoulos DK, Novi EA, Kanata MP. Intrathoracic migration of a Steinman wire: a case report and review of the literature. Cases J. 2009;2:8321. doi: 10.4076/1757-1626-2-8321.

  10. Mozaffari M, Estfan R, Sarkar S. Intrathoracic migration of an unbent Steinmann pin. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(2):e21-e23. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13814021678916.

  11. Thompson JW, Nguyen CHD, Lazar RH, Stocks RM, Schoumacher RA, Hamdan F, et al. Evaluation and management of hemoptysis in infants and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996;105:516-20. doi: 10.1177/000348949610500704.



AFFILIATIONS

1 Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad T1, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.

2 Department of Cardiac Surgery.

3 Department of General Surgery.



CORRESPONDENCE

Miguel Ángel Echeverry-Gutiérrez, MD. E-mail: miguelecheverry18@gmail.com




Received: 12-16-2023. Accepted: 02-02-2024.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2024;9