medigraphic.com
ISSN 2395-8979 (Electronic)
CuidArte ”El Arte del Cuidado”

2024, Number 25

<< Back Next >>

CuidArte 2024; 13 (25)

Teaching self-care to patients with kidney transplantation: a systematic review

Santos GLA, Rodríguez ZMC, Palacios MBI, Meza MLM

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page:
PDF size: 402.68 Kb.


Text Extraction

Introduction. The information, orientation and teaching that the patient and family receive about self-care, before and after the kidney transplant, is essential; they are stages where they are prepared for unknown events or actions. Teaching self-care will have to be based on knowledge and skills that facilitate adaptation to healthy lifestyles and avoid complications that put the effectiveness of the graft at risk. Objective. To carry out a systematic review on the self-care teaching that kidney transplant patients receive from the nursing professional in the clinical follow-up consultation, pre- and postoperatively, as well as the use of didactic resources. Methodology. The systematic review was between August 2022 and March 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed with reviews in PubMed, Elsevier, Clinical Key, CINAHL and Scielo between a period from 2015 to 2023 of first initiation and in a second review in Google Scholar. Of the total, 20 works were selected that met the PICO question and the eligibility criteria. Results. Four areas of self-care teaching were identified: educational measures, comorbidities, infection prevention and mental health. As well as three areas of intervention: physical/ biological, mental and social. Conclusions. The teaching of self-care that nursing considers is verbal, demonstrative, written, supported by pamphlets, short videos and booklets, where therapeutic attachment focuses on educational methods of self-management and how the determinants of HRQoL improve with transplantation. Thus, such as the participation of the family as “primary caregiver”.


REFERENCES

  1. Cancino-López JD, Hernández-Aguilar, U, Oribe-Aguilar DI, Rojas-Montiel D, Escobar-Nieto JA, PinedaMorales M. Supervivenciadel paciente trasplantado y del injerto renal en una cohorte retrospectiva en México. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2021;60(1):53–8.

  2. Gobierno de México. CENATRA [Internet]. 2do Informe trimestral 2022 sobre donación y trasplante. [consultado 25 marzo2023]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/468CgQE

  3. Mahdizadeh A, Oskouie F, Khanjari S, Parvizy S. The need for renovating patient education in kidney transplantation: Aqualitative study. J Educ Health Promot. [internet] 2020[consultado 29 marzo 2023]; 9:154. Doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_574_19

  4. Villeneuve C, Rerolle J phillipe, Couzi L, Westeel PF, Etienne I, Esposito L, et al. Therapeutic education as a tool to improvepatient-reported and clinical outcomes after renal transplantation: results of the EPHEGREN multicenter retrospective cohortstudy. Transpl Int [internet] 2021 [consultado 31 marzo 2023]; 34(11):2341–52. doi: 10.1111/tri.14127

  5. Carolina Pérez Blancas, M.a Carmen Moyano Espadero, Miriam Estepa del Árbol y Rodolfo Crespo Montero. Factors associatedwith health-related quality of life in renal transplant recipients. Enferm Nefrol [internet] 2015 [consultado 3 abril 2023];18(3).Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3NxxdC3

  6. Scheel J, Schieber K, Reber S, Jank S, Eckardt KU, Grundmann F, et al. Psychological processing of a kidney transplantation,perceived quality of life, and immunosuppressant medication adherence. Patient Prefer Adherence. [internet] 2019 [consultado18 mayo 2023]; 13:775–82. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S194254

  7. Goetzmann L, Sarac N, Ambühl P, Boehler A, Irani S, Muellhaupt B, et al. Psychological response and quality of life aftertransplantation: a comparison between heart, lung, liver and kidney recipients. Swiss Med Wkly. [internet] 2008 [consultado18 mayo 2023]; 138(33–34):477–83. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12160

  8. Brijmohan A, Famure O, Sihota K, Shea M, Marzario B, Mitchell M. Psychosocial needs assessment post kidney transplant:Feasibility of a post-transplant specific support group. CANNT J J ACITN. [internet] 2015 [consultado 18 mayo 2023]; 25(3):14–21. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3N8XpkP

  9. Aghakhani N, Maslakpak MH, Jalali S, Parizad N. Self-Care Education Program as a New Pathway Toward Improving Quality ofLife in Kidney Transplant Patients: A Single-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Exp Clin Transplant. [internet] 2021 [consultado27 abril 2023]; 19(3):224–30. doi: 10.6002/ect.2020.0044

  10. Campus Virtual de Salud Pública (CVSP/OPS). Autocuidado para personal en primera línea de respuesta en situaciones deemergencia en Latinoamérica [Internet] 2021 [consultado 15 mayo 2023]. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Cudjl9

  11. Naranjo Hernández Y, Concepción Pacheco JA, Rodríguez Larreynaga M. La teoría Déficit de autocuidado: Dorothea ElizabethOrem. Gac Médica Espirituana. [internet] 2017 [consultado 27 abril 2023];19(3):89–100, Disponible en: https://bit.ly/4443fL8

  12. Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis.Med Clín Barc. [internet] 2010 [consultado 28 abril 2023]; 135(11):507–11. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizadapara la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas. Rev Esp Cardiol. [internet] 2021 [consultado 30 mayo 2023]; 74(9):790–9. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016

  14. Ortiz Pastelero P, Martínez Lara C. Influencia del profesional de enfermería en la calidad de vida de pacientes receptores detrasplante renal. Rev. Esp. Salud Pública. [internet] 2022 [consultado 26 abril 2023]; 95: e202107093. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Jg6pn6

  15. Been-Dahmen JMJ, Grijpma JW, Ista E, Dwarswaard J, Maasdam L, Weimar W, et al. Self-management challenges and supportneeds among kidney transplant recipients: A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. [internet] 2018 [consultado 29 abril 2023];74(10):2393–405. doi: 10.1111/jan.13730

  16. Kim S, Ju MK, Son S, Jun S, Lee SY, Han CS. Development of video-based educational materials for kidney-transplant patients.PLOS ONE. [internet] 2020 [consultado 3 mayo 2023];15(8): e0236750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236750

  17. Memory KE, Wilkinson TJ, Smith AC, Lightfoot CJ. A qualitative exploration of the facilitators and barriers to self-managementin kidney transplant recipients. J Nephrol. [internet] 2022 [consultado 28 abril 2023]; 35(7):1863–72. doi: 10.1007/s40620-022-01325-w

  18. Jamieson NJ, Hanson CS, Josephson MA, Gordon EJ, Craig JC, Halleck F, et al. Motivations, Challenges, and Attitudes to Selfmanagementin Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl KidneyFound. [internet] 2016 [consultado 28 abril 2023]; 67(3):461–78. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.030

  19. Low JK, Manias E, Crawford K, Walker R, Mulley WR, Toussaint ND, et al. Improving medication adherence in adult kidneytransplantation (IMAKT): A pilot randomised controlled trial. Sci Rep. [internet] 2019 [consultado 3 mayo 2023]; 9(1):7734. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44002-y

  20. Tan S, Merchant J. Joseph Murray (1919–2012): First transplant surgeon. Singapore Med J. [internet] 2019 [consultado 3 mayo2023]; 60(4):162–3. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019032

  21. Rivera-Luna EN, Cruz-Santiago J, Meza-Jiménez G, Bernáldez-Gómez G, Moreno-Ley PI. Manejo perioperatorio en el receptorde trasplante renal. Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional «La Raza» IMSS. Rev Mex Traspl. [internet] 2016[consultado 5 mayo 2023]; 5(1):27–33. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Xbkp7x

  22. María de, Ana G, Claudia Carcencia Barajas, Silvia Rubi Ortiz Luis. Complicaciones de pacientes con trasplante renal en lasprimeras 48 horas en un hospital de tercer nivel de atención. Rev Enf Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2019;27(3):154–62.

  23. Rodríguez IBT, Roig JS, Carrascosa MP, Mateos FM. Recomendaciones en el seguimiento del trasplantado renal. FMC. [internet]2021 [consultado 7 mayo 2023]; 28(5):289–94. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/463CNTV

  24. Cortazar-Benítez LF, González-Patiño MA, Barbosa A, Pardinas-Llergo MJ, Rodríguez-Weber FL, Díaz-Greene EJ. Infeccionestempranas postrasplante renal. Med Int Méx. [internet] 2015 [consultado 05 octubre 2023]; 31:550-56. Disponible en: https://bit.ly/3Q81tEA

  25. DePasquale N, Cabacungan A, Ephraim PL, Lewis-Boyér L, Powe NR, Boulware LE. Family Members’ Experiences with Dialysis andKidney Transplantation. Kidney Med. [internet] 2019 [consultado 27 abril 2023]; 1(4):171–9. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2019.06.001

  26. Pillajo Sánchez BL, Guacho Guacho JS, Moya Guerrero IR. La enfermedad renal crónica. Revisión de la literatura y experiencialocal en una ciudad de Ecuador. Rev Colomb Nefrol.[internet] 2021 [consultado 27 abril 2023]; 8(3):1–10. doi: 10.22265/acnef.8.3.396

  27. Chadban SJ, Ahn C, Axelrod DA, Foster BJ, Kasiske BL, Kher V, et al. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation andManagement of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation. [internet] 2020 [consultado 27 mayo 2023]; 104(4S1Suppl 1): S11–103. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003136

  28. OMS. 75.a Trasplante de órganos y tejidos humanos: Informe del director general. Asamblea Mundial de la Salud. [internet]2022. [Consultado 5 octubre 2023]. Disponible: https://bit.ly/3Q3u7FH

  29. Zabalegui A. Cuidado centrado en el paciente, una función intrínseca a la Enfermería. Nursing (Lond). [internet] 2017[consultado 24 mayo 2023]; 34(5):6. doi: 10.1016/j.nursi.2017.10.001

  30. Liu L, Liu YP, Wang J, An LW, Jiao JM. Use of a knowledge-attitude-behaviour education programme for Chinese adultsundergoing maintenance haemodialysis: Randomized controlled trial. J Int Med Res. [internet] 2016 [consultado 05 octubre2023]; 44(3):557-68. doi: 10.1177/0300060515604980.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com