medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.

2021, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Card Mex 2021; 6 (3)

Aortic root surgery with preservation of the native valve for Minimal Invasive Surgery. First case in Mexico

Martínez-Hernández HJ, Zambrana-Torres ÁD, Pierola-Talos G, Reyes-Rodríguez A

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 66-69
PDF size: 227.24 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Valve-sparing aortic root surgery has become of greater interest among surgeons, especially in young patients with Marfan's syndrome, to increase their survival. Minimally invasive surgery is an alternative that must be taken into account since it is very safe and reproducible, with the same or better results than conventional surgery. The objective is to report the first case in Mexico of aortic root surgery with preservation of the valve


REFERENCES

  1. Pyeritz RE, McKusick VA. The Marfan syndrome: diagnosis and management. NEngl J Med. 1979;300(14):772-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197904053001406.

  2. Judge DP, Dietz HC. Marfan's syndrome. Lancet. 2005;366(9501):1965-76. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67789-6.

  3. Shirley ED, Sponseller PD. Marfan syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg.2009;17(9):572-81. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200909000-00004.

  4. Marsalese DL, Moodie DS, Vacante M, et al. Marfan's syndrome: natural historyand long-term follow-up of cardiovascular involvement. J Am Coll Cardiol.1989;14(2):422-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(89)90197-6.

  5. Fleischer KJ, Nousari HC, Anhalt GJ, Stone CD, Laschinger JC. Immunohistochemicalabnormalities of fibrillin in cardiovascular tissues in Marfan's syndrome.Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(4):1012-7. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(97)00061-1.

  6. Silverman DI, Burton KJ, Gray J, et al. Life expectancy in the Marfan syndrome..Am J Cardiol. 1995;75(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)80066-1.

  7. Bentall H, De Bono A. A technique for complete replacement of the ascendingaorta. Thorax. 1968; 23(4):338-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.23.4.338.

  8. Yacoub M, Fagan A, Stassano P, Radley-Smith R. Results of valve conservingoperations for aortic regurgitation. Circulation. 1983; 68 (3):311-21.

  9. Bernhardt AM, Treede H, Rybczynski M, et al. Comparison of aortic rootreplacement in patients with Marfan syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg.2011;40(5):1052-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.018.

  10. Svensson LG, Blackstone EH, Alsalihi M, et al. Midterm results of David reimplantationin patients with connective tissue disorder. Ann ThoracSurg 2013;2:555-62. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.043.

  11. Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J AmColl Cardiol 2012; 56(6):455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053.

  12. Svensson LG, Atik FA, Cosgrove DM, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventionalmitral valve surgery: a propensity-matched comparison. J Thorac CardiovascSurg. 2010;139(4):926-32.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.038.

  13. Phan K, Xie A, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. A meta-analysis of minimally invasiveversus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg2014;98(4):1499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060.

  14. Brown ML, McKellar SH, Sundt TM, Schaff HV. Ministernotomy versus conventionalsternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a systematic review andmeta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137(3):670-9.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.010.

  15. Harky A, Al-Adhami A, Chan JSK, Wong CHM, Bashir M. Minimally InvasiveVersus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement - A Systematic Reviewand Meta-Analysis. Heart Lung Circ 2019;28(12):1841-51. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.10.023.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com