García-Félix-Díaz G

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 133-134
PDF size: 82.82 Kb.

REFERENCES

1. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008; 22(2): 338-42.

2. Kamal AH. Do orthopaedics surgeons have any idea what predatory journals are?: (cross-sectional study). Heliyon. 2024; 10(5): e26448.

3. Tenopir C, King D, Edwards S, Wu L. Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. Aslib Proc. 2009; 61(1): 5-32.

4. Bjork BC, Solomon D. The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. J Imformetr. 2013; 7(4): 914-23.

5. Carnelley M. Publish or perish: perceived benefits versus unintended consequences. J Sch Pub. 2019; 50(2): 143-8.

6. Shaneyfelt T. Resource review on: how to read a paper-the basics of evidence based medicine. Fourth edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell 2010BMJ. Evid Based Med. 2011; 16(1): 6-6.

7. Mavrogenis AF, Hernigou P, Scarlat MM. Artificial intelligence, natural stupidity or artificial stupidity: who is today the winner in orthopaedics? What is true and what is fraud? What legal barriers exist for scientific writing? Int Orthop. 2024; 48(3): 617-23.

8. González-Velasco MF. ¿Qué es autoplagio y cómo evitarlo? Acta Ortop Mex. 2022; 36(6): 333-4.

9. Donley C, McCrosson M, Prahad S, Campbell C, Zhao F, Amireddy N, et al. High research productivity during orthopaedic surgery residency may be predicted by number of publications as a medical student. JBJS Open Access. 2024; 9(1): e23.00105.