medigraphic.com
Órgano de Difusión de la Asociación Académica Panamericana de Medicina Familiar A.C.

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Arch Med Fam 2024; 26 (3)

Perceived Quality of Life in Patients with Permanent Pacemakers in a Family Medicine Unit in Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

Martínez-Hernández P, Diaz ZGL, Cortes SCS

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 153-158
PDF size: 191.00 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify sociodemographic characteristics and quality of life perceived by patients with permanent pacemakers. Methods: Descriptive, prospective and cross-sectional design with a convenience sample of 66 patients over 18 years of age with permanent pacemaker from the Family Medicine Unit No. 66 of Xalapa, Veracruz. Mexico. After informed consent, the sociodemographic questionnaire and the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire for quality of life were applied (Cronbach Alpha = 0.895). Measures of central tendency, dispersion, absolute and relative frequencies were calculated; the χ2 test (0.05) was used to analyze the association. Results: 66 patients were interviewed, 37 men and 29 women, average age 73 years, married (38%), primary schooling (62%), complete extended single-parent family (24%), integrated nucleus (46%), urban ( 83%), traditional (73%), employed (33%), low family poverty (69%), perceived themselves to be sick (95%), secondary to symptomatic bradycardia (39%), placement of 5 to 6 years (24% ), average quality of life (48.5%), little satisfied (39.4%), low quality of life in the physical aspect (48%), psychological (30%), in social relationships (21%) and environment (35%). Conclusions: The perceived quality of life was low in the a) physical aspect, due to sleep and pain problems; b) psychological, due to the way in which one accepts one’s appearance; c) from the environment, they perceive themselves as insecure when living their lives.


REFERENCES

  1. Olaya Sánchez A, Jaramillo Trujillo G. Hallazgoselectrocardiográficos en pacientes con marcapasosdefinitivo: revisión de la literatura. Repert Med Cir. 2017;26(2):67-77.

  2. Hurtado Nazal C, Araneda A, Zamora A, Parra A, GonzálezA. Cuidado perioperatorio de pacientes portadoresde dispositivos electrónicos cardiacos implantables.Rev Chil Cir. 2017;69(1):77-83.

  3. Arguello Hurtado M, Guevara Valdivia M, Aranda-AyalaZ, Hernández Lara J. Factores asociados e implicadosen la exteriorización de marcapasos definitivo, seguimientoa cinco años. Rev Med Inst Mex Seg Soc.2015;53 (1): 104-8.

  4. Cardiología. org [Internet]; México; Gobierno de méxico.[ citado 2020 junio 17]. Disponible en: url. https://www.cardiologia.org.mx/transparencia/transparencia_focalizada/estadisticas/

  5. Robles Espinoza AI, Rubio Jurado B, De la Rosa GalvánEV, Nava Zavala A. Generalidades y conceptos de calidadde vida en relación con los cuidados de salud. ElResidente 2016;11(3):120-125.

  6. Campos Vera N, Rivas Estany E, Hernández García S,Rodríguez Nande L, Castillo Diez E, Andrade Ruiz H. Rehabilitacióncardiovascular y su efecto en la calidad devida luego de intervencionismo coronario percutáneo.Rev Cub Cardio y Cirug Cardiovascular 2019;25(1):1-11.

  7. Figueroa López CG, Talavera Peña AK, Cigarroa López J,Ramos del Rio B. Comorbilidad emocional, calidad devida y afrontamiento a la descarga eléctrica en pacientescon desfibrilador automático implantable. Rev EspCienc Sal 2019; 22(1):5-11.

  8. Gonçalo SS, Grotti EMO, Furuia RK, Dantas RAS, RossiLA, Dessotte CAM. Health-related quality of life of patientswith permanent cardiac pacing. Texto ContextoEnferm 2020; 29(1):1-12.

  9. Udo E, M van Hemel N, Zuithoff N, Nijboer H, Taks W etal. Long term quality-0f-life in patients with bradycardiapecemaker implantation. Internatio Journal Cardio2013; 2159-2163

  10. Santos Oliviera MS, Torres da Silva G, Ramos SantanaM.A. A Qualidade de vida portadores de marca-passocardiaco. Rev. e-ciênc 2016;4(1):82-88

  11. Malpartida Ampudia MK. Familia: enfoque y abordajeen la atención primaria, Rev Med Sinergia 2020;5(9):e543.

  12. Consenso de Medicina Familiar. Conceptos básicospara el estudio de las familias. Arch Med Fam, 2005;7(1): S15-19

  13. Jiménez Almaguer D, Casado Méndez P, Santos FonsecaR, Jiménez Almaguer D, Hernández Ramírez G.Percepción de la calidad de vida en pacientes adultosmayores con diabetes mellitus tipo II. Rev Elect Medimay2019;26(1) 54- 62.

  14. Lezcano Olivera A, Bueno-Figueredo L, Viamontes HernándezC, Miranda- Fragoso A, Estimulación cardíacapermanente en el servicio de cardiología del HospitalUniversitario Manuel Ascunce Domenech. Rev Progaleno2018;1(1): 37- 51.

  15. Casola Crespo R, Casola Crespo E, Chunllo QuishpiR, Casola García S. Marcapasos permanente: a propósitodel diagnóstico tardío del desplazamiento delelectrodo. AMC [Internet]. Feb 2016 [citado 17 Sep2018];20(1): [aprox. 5 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552016000100009&lng=es

  16. Tofano de Barros R, Ribeiro SM, Moraes Silva AM, Carvalho-Borges JB. Evaluation of patient ́s quality of lifeaspects after cardiac pacemaker implatantation. RevBras Cir Cardiovasc 2014; 29(1):37

  17. Pesante TS, Labres de Freitas TL, Piccoli Korb J, NunesFerreira J, Simões Dias A et all. Pacemarker implicationsin the functional capacity and quality of life ofcardiopathic patients. Fisioter Mov. 2019; 32:1-9




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com