medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Cardiaca en México

ISSN 2448-5640 (Print)
Diario Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Cirugía Cardiaca, A.C., y del Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Torácica, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2024, Number 3

<< Back

Cir Card Mex 2024; 9 (3)

Total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy: a novel approach to achieving comprehensive coronary revascularization

De La Cerda-Belmont, Gustavo A1,2; Garza-De La Maza, Arturo1,3; Cepeda-Flores, María G1,4; Chávez-De La Mora, Jorge A1,5; González-Zúñiga, Claudia E1,5; Vázquez-González, Roberto M1,2; Morales-Marín, César A1,2; Buelna-Gaxiola, Fabiola1,3; Flores-Morín, Gerardo M1,6; Pedroza-Solís, Eliasib1,2
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/116101

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/116101
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/116101

Language: English
References: 27
Page: 105-110
PDF size: 373.21 Kb.


Key words:

coronary artery bypass grafting, coronary artery disease, minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

ABSTRACT

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the cornerstone for myocardial revascularization. However, rising demand for less invasive procedures, such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), has challenged its dominance. The emergence of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) presents a groundbreaking alternative. TCRAT achieves complete revascularization through a minimally invasive approach, leveraging left anterior thoracotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and peripheral cannulation. Its safety and efficacy mark a transformative shift in coronary artery disease management.

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) has been a cornerstone in treating coronary artery disease for over half a century.1 Despite significant advances in coronary artery disease management, especially in percutaneous interventions and perioperative care, the core techniques of CABG have undergone minimal evolution. Notably, the use of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to revascularize the left anterior descending artery (LAD) marks a pivotal advancement in CABG.1 Despite its unchanged nature, CABG remains the gold standard for myocardial revascularization, particularly for patients with complex coronary artery pathology,2-6 with a sternotomy approach being the predominant choice globally.7-9 However, there has been a substantial surge in demand for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and less invasive procedures over the last two decades due to patient attractiveness.6,10 The preference for PCI over CABG is attributed to perceptions of invasiveness and patients' short- and long-term preferences.11 Despite evidence favoring CABG, its growth has stagnated, while PCI procedures have tripled and continue to rise.5,6 Robotic endoscopic CABG and minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) CABG have been introduced to reduce invasiveness, yet their adoption remains limited due to technical complexities and infrastructure requirements.5,7,9,12-15 Offering complete revascularization through minimally invasive techniques remains challenging despite their effectiveness, highlighting the ongoing need for advancements in surgical approaches.5,12,16,17

Until 2019, no technique systematically addressed the challenge of complete revascularization while preserving key surgical principles and wide applicability for most patients. Babliak et al. proposed a new operative approach called "total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT)" in 2019.18 Based on established cardiac surgery concepts and insights from minimally invasive cardiac surgery, this technique utilizes a small left anterior thoracotomy for revascularization in multivessel coronary diseases. TCRAT represents a promising advancement in achieving comprehensive coronary revascularization through minimally invasive means. We describe how we are applying this technique in our center.



PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION

Thorough preoperative planning is essential for ensuring the success of surgeries, especially in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Identifying potential complications ahead of time allows for proactive intervention, minimizing obstacles to the patient's recovery. Specific preoperative conditions such as chronic lung diseases, cerebrovascular diseases, peripheral artery disease, chest wall abnormalities, lung irradiation, and prior cardiac and/or lung surgeries warrant particular attention. Standard preoperative assessments for these cases involve various diagnostic procedures including electrocardiogram, chest X-Ray, complete blood laboratory tests, echocardiogram, and cardiac catheterization, mirroring those performed in cases requiring full sternotomy. However, it is important to note that there may be variations in preoperative investigations for standards CABG. The significance of computed tomography (CT) in the preoperative assessment of minimally invasive procedures cannot be underestimated.19-21 CT scans provide invaluable insight into the patient´s anatomy, facilitating the safe execution of surgeries. Detailed information about the lungs, airway, chest wall, mediastinum, heart, major blood vessels, and peripheral vascular anatomy is obtained through CT scans. Notably, CT findings related to peripheral artery disease are of particular importance, as they can influence the chosen surgical approach, especially in peripheral cannulation (transaxillary or transfemoral), and must be carefully considered during the planning phase.

Surgical technique18,22-24

Patients are positioned supine with the left chest slightly elevated to optimize exposure of LIMA and the heart (Figure 1). The saphenous vein is harvested using a disposable endoscopic retractor and a bipolar radiofrequency vessel sealing system (Vasoview Hemopro, Getinge, Sweden), through a 2.5 cm incision made at the medial surface of the knee.

TCRAT is conducted via a left mini-thoracotomy, which entails a 5 to 8-cm skin incision positioned on the fourth intercostal space, obviating the necessity for rib resection. A small thoracic retractor is introduced through the mini-thoracotomy, facilitating the identification, clipping, and sectioning of LIMA. Before clipping LIMA, 8,000 units of heparin are administered intravenously. Concurrently, access to the femoral vessels is attained through a 1 cm inguinal incision, and femoral venous and arterial cannulation is accomplished utilizing dedicated cannulae. The placement of these cannulae is always guided by transesophageal echocardiography and in some instances, fluoroscopy. In cases where indicated, access to the axillary artery is achieved through a 2 cm subclavian incision and cannulated using an 8 mm vascular graft.

LIMA harvesting is conducted under direct surgical visualization using long conventional instruments and a specialized internal mammary artery (IMA) retractor (Delacroix-Chevalier, MIDAccess IMA Retractor) (Figure 2). Upon completion of LIMA harvesting and cannulation, heparinization is adjusted to 300 units per kilogram, and cardiopulmonary bypass is initiated employing vacuum-assisted drainage.

The pericardium is longitudinally opened from the apex to the ascending aorta and widely to the sides, with careful attention to avoid injury to the phrenic nerve. The ascending aorta is dissected and freed from the pulmonary arteries, encircled with tape (Figure 3), and subsequently maneuvered toward the thoracic incision to facilitate the insertion of the cardioplegia cannula. A transthoracic aortic clamp is introduced through the left second intercostal space, between the midclavicular and anterior axillary lines. Under direct vision, the aorta is cross-clamped, and antegrade cardioplegia is administered to achieve cardiac arrest.

Following cardiac arrest, cessation of cardioplegia infusion, and once complete decompression of the heart are achieved, the heart is mobilized with dressing forceps, and left pulmonary veins (Figure 4) as well as inferior vena cava (Figure 5) are encircled with tapes.

To achieve optimal exposure for coronary artery bypass grafting, specific maneuvers are employed to rotate the heart effectively. These maneuvers are orchestrated to facilitate surgical access to different coronary territories. A detailed description is as follows:



RIGHT CORONARY TERRITORY EXPOSURE:

  • 1. The left pulmonary vein tape is moved under the heart and towards the inferior vena cava.
  • 2. Simultaneously, traction is applied to both the left pulmonary veins and inferior vena cava tapes in a downward direction.
  • 3. This maneuver induces a rotation of the heart, enabling the exposure of the posterior descending artery up to the right coronary artery (Figure 6).



CIRCUMFLEX TERRITORY EXPOSURE:

  • 1. Initially, the inferior vena cava tape is shifted under the heart towards the left pulmonary veins.
  • 2. Subsequently, traction is applied simultaneously upwards on both the left pulmonary veins and inferior vena cava tapes.
  • 3. This maneuver induces a rotation of the heart, enabling the exposure of the lateral wall for access to the circumflex territory (Figure 7).



LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING TERRITORY EXPOSURE:

  • 1. To access the left anterior descending territory, a simpler maneuver is executed.
  • 2. Traction is applied downwards on both the left pulmonary veins tape and the inferior vena cava tape (Figure 8).

Once the desired anastomosis is completed, traction is discontinued, allowing the heart to return to its original position. Anastomoses are performed using standard coronary instruments and the standard anastomotic technique of running sutures. The average distance from the skin to coronary anastomoses ranges from 6 to 8 cm. Proximal vein anastomoses to the aorta are facilitated using a side clamp while pulling downward on the ascending aorta tape (Figure 9). These meticulous traction and rotation maneuvers ensure adequate and stable exposure of any coronary target, irrespective of ventricular localization; this configuration is outlined in Figure 10 and 11.



COMMENT

In Mexico, the field of minimally invasive cardiac surgery has yet to witness complete revascularization through surgical means, with only a handful of previous reports detailing incomplete revascularization procedures.25-27 However, the introduction of the TCRAT technique marks a significant leap forward. Proposed by Babliak et al. in 2019,18 this pioneering method integrates insights from minimally invasive cardiac surgery and adheres to established cardiac surgery principles, offering a promising avenue for achieving comprehensive coronary revascularization while minimizing the invasiveness associated with traditional approaches.

The TCRAT technique, characterized by precise maneuvers, ensures adequate and stable exposure of any coronary target identified preoperatively by the heart team for revascularization. Regardless of ventricular localization, this approach enables complete anatomical revascularization with unparalleled dexterity, ensuring optimal graft placement and functional outcomes for every patient.

The advent of TCRAT heralds a new era in the management of coronary artery disease in Mexico, presenting patients with a viable alternative to traditional surgical methods while maintaining the highest standards of safety and efficacy. As the first manuscript documenting such an experience in Mexico, TCRAT not only broadens the horizons of cardiac surgeons but also lays the groundwork for future innovations in minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Furthermore, its reproducible technique ensures that this groundbreaking approach can be embraced and enhanced by any cardiac surgical team, solidifying its status as a transformative milestone in cardiovascular care.


REFERENCES

  1. Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, Huysmans HA, Kappetein AP. Coronary artery bypass grafting: Part 1--the evolution over the first 50 years. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34 (37): 2862-2872. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht330.

  2. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022; 145 (3): e4-e17. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001039.

  3. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019; 40 (2): 87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.

  4. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Dangas GD, et al. Long-term survival following multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes: the FREEDOM follow-on study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73 (6): 629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.001.

  5. Fortunato GA, Davierwala PM, The current role and future perspectives of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting. JOVS. 2023; 9 (40): 22-41. doi: 10.21037/jovs-22-41.

  6. Sipahi I, Akay MH, Dagdelen S, Blitz A, Alhan C. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long-term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174 (2): 223-230. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12844.

  7. Teman NR, Hawkins RB, Charles EJ, et al. Minimally invasive vs open coronary surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of cost and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021; 111 (5): 1478-1484. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.136.

  8. Holubec T, Dahle G, Bonaros N. Editorial: minimally invasive cardiac surgery: state of the art and current challenges. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10: 1286868. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1286868.

  9. Doenst T, Diab M, Sponholz C, Bauer M, Farber G. The opportunities and limitations of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017; 114 (46): 777-784. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0777.

  10. Van der Merwe J, Casselman F. Minimally invasive surgical coronary artery revascularization-current status and future perspectives in an era of interventional advances. JOVS. 2023; 9 (21): 22-40. doi: 10.21037/jovs-22-40.

  11. Kipp R, Lehman J, Israel J, Edwards N, Becker T, Raval AN. Patient preferences for coronary artery bypass graft surgery or percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 82 (2): 212-218. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24399.

  12. McGinn JT Jr, Usman S, Lapierre H, Pothula VR, Mesana TG, Ruel M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: dual-center experience in 450 consecutive patients. Circulation. 2009; 120 (11 Suppl): S78-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840041.

  13. Oosterlinck W, Algoet M, Balkhy HH. Minimally invasive coronary surgery: how should it be defined? Innovations (Phila). 2023; 18 (1): 22-27. doi: 10.1177/15569845231153366.

  14. Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, et al. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 123 (6): 1125-1131. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.121305.

  15. Nambiar P, Mittal C. Minimally invasive coronary bypass using internal thoracic arteries via a left minithoracotomy: "the Nambiar Technique". Innovations (Phila). 2013; 8 (6): 420-426. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000035.

  16. Guo MH, Wells GA, Glineur D, et al. Minimally Invasive coronary surgery compared to STernotomy coronary artery bypass grafting: the MIST trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019; 78: 140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.006.

  17. Kikuchi K, Mori M. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017; 25 (5): 364-370. doi: 10.1177/0218492317692465.

  18. Babliak O, Demianenko V, Melnyk Y, Revenko K, Pidgayna L, Stohov O. Complete coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy. Innovations (Phila). 2019; 14 (4): 330-341. doi: 10.1177/1556984519849126.

  19. Leonard JR, Henry M, Rahouma M, et al. Systematic preoperative CT scan is associated with reduced risk of stroke in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 278: 300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.025.

  20. Moscarelli M. CT scan in minimally invasive surgery: a call to safety. Int J Cardiol. 2019; 278: 307-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.058.

  21. Miller CL, Kocher M, Koweek LH, Zwischenberger BA. Use of computed tomography (CT) for preoperative planning in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). J Card Surg. 2022; 37 (12): 4150-4157. doi: 10.1111/jocs.17000.

  22. Babliak O, Demianenko V, Melnyk Y, et al. Multivessel arterial revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 32 (4): 655-662. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.02.032.

  23. Dorge H, Sellin C, Belmenai A, Asch S, Eggebrecht H, Schächinger V. Novel concept of routine total arterial coronary bypass grafting through a left anterior approach avoiding sternotomy. Heart Vessels. 2022; 37 (8): 1299-1304. doi: 10.1007/s00380-022-02034-x.

  24. Sellin C, Asch S, Belmenai A, Mourad F, Voss M, Dörge H. Early results of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023; 71 (6): 448-454. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758149.

  25. Siordia-Zamorano JA, Gamez-Blanco L. Cirugía de revascularización coronaria mediante procedimientos de invasión mínima. Revisión de opciones, indicaciones y comparación con otros procedimientos. Rev Mex Car. 2001; 12 (3): 121-127.

  26. Oviedo-López A, López-Valenzuela P, Martínez-Hernández R, Solorio S, Hernández-González MA. La cirugía de revascularización por toracotomía izquierda sin circulación extracorpórea, es una alternativa viable en la re-operacción de puentes coronarios. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2008; 78 (3): 299-304.

  27. Gómez-Sánchez LE, Gaitán-Sastoque OA, Del Sol-García M, Rojas-Jaimes RA. Revascularización coronaria mínimamente invasiva y asistida por robot: primera experiencia en México. Rev Mex Anestes. 2016; 39 (4): 295-298.



AFFILIATIONS

1 NOVOCARDIO, Monterrey, Nuevo León, México.

2 Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

3 Department of Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.

4 Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia.

5 Department of Interventional Cardiology.

6 Emergency Department.



CORRESPONDENCE

Dr. Gustavo Armando De La Cerda Belmont. E-mail: guar20382@hotmail.com




Received: 01/04/2024. Accepted: 07/03/2024.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Card Mex. 2024;9