medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2902 (Electronic)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior 2022; 36 (2)

Perceptions of phonoaudiology students on simulation-based gamified learning

Ramiro MA, López VML, Serra SV

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 1-18
PDF size: 433.50 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Simulation-based gamified learning is emerging as a pedagogical proposal to meet the needs of contemporary students, who develop themselves in settings of continuous technological advancement. Moreover, they favor the acquisition and development of clinical reasoning and skills, which improves patient safety.
Objective: To evaluate the perception of fourth-year Phonoaudiology students on the simulation and gamification proposal applied in the otoneurology and labyrinthology clinic at the National University of Córdoba, Argentina.
Methods: In this cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational research, the participants (n=89) completed three assessment questionnaires: for the eye movement simulation activity, for the gamification activity in audiological clinic, and about general aspects of the subject. Descriptive and multivariate statistics were used for data analysis. The multivariate associations between questionnaire items were studied by means of principal component analysis.
Results: A high percentage was obtained regarding acceptance of both activities. Multivariate analysis permitted to explain 59 % of the variability, and revealed a positive association between simulation and gamification. Moreover, these pedagogical proposals were positively correlated with meaningful learning indicators, the curriculum objectives, the evaluation methods and the didactic resources applied.
Conclusions: These tools generate organizational and facilitating settings for the teaching-learning process, especially in otoneurological subjects. The results increase the applicability of simulation and gamification in university education.


REFERENCES

  1. Barneva RP, Kanev K, Kapralos B, Jenkin M, Brimkov B. Integrating technology-enhanced collaborative surfaces and gamification for the next generation classroom. J Educ Technol Syst. 2017;45(3):309-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516671945

  2. Allan HT, O'Driscoll M, Simpson V, Shawe J. Teachers' views of using e-learning for non-traditional students in higher education across three disciplines [nursing, chemistry and management] at a time of massification and increased diversity in higher education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(9):1068-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.003

  3. Laing C, Robinson A. The withdrawal of non-traditional students: Developing an explanatory model. J Further Higher Educ. 2003;27(2):175-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000065190

  4. Pesare E, Roselli T, Corriero N, Rossano V. Game-based learning and gamification to promote engagement and motivation in medical learning contexts. Smart Learn Environ. 2016;3(1):5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0028-0

  5. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT. Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. JEE. 2005;94(1):87-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x

  6. Finn JD, Zimmer KS. Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL, Wylie C (eds). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer; 2012. pp. 97-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

  7. Chen DL, Kim J, Mooney RJ. Training a multilingual sportscaster: Using perceptual context to learn language. J Artif Intell Res. 2010;37:397-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2962

  8. O'Brien HL, Toms EG. What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tec. 2008;59(6):938-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20801

  9. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):50-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x

  10. Sørensen JL, Østergaard D, LeBlanc V, Ottesen B, Konge L, Dieckmann P, et al. Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3

  11. Aynsley S, Crawford R. Pilot evaluation of medical student perception of a novel pharmacology-based role-play game: Braincept. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017;30(1):97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/efh.EfH_278_15

  12. Azhari NN, Abdul Manaf R, Ng SW, Bajunid SA, Bajunid SF, Gobil M, et al. Gamification, a Successful Method to Foster Leptospirosis Knowledge among University Students: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(12):2108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122108

  13. Brull S, Finlayson S. Importance of gamification in increasing learning. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2016;47(8):372-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20160715-09

  14. Bârsan G, Nastasescu V, Bârsan V. Simulation and Gamification in e-Learning Technical Courses. International Conference-The Knowledge-Based Organization. Rumania: "Nicolae Balcescu" Land Forces Academy; 2017. p. 7-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0148

  15. Dlugaiczyk J, Thiemer M, Neubert C, Schorn BA, Schick B. The aVOR app increases medical students' competence in treating Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV). Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(5):e401-e6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001778

  16. Naeve-Velguth S, Christensen SA, Woods S. Simulated patients in audiology education: Student reports. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24(8):740-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.24.8.10

  17. Van Velden JS, Cook C, Du Toit N, Myer L. Primary health eye care: evaluation of the competence of medical students in performing fundoscopy with the direct ophthalmoscope. S Afr Fam Pract. 2010;52(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20786204.2010.10874003

  18. Oliva Domínguez M. Elaboración de un sistema virtual de simulación de nistagmos y movimientos oculares. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2007;58(2):66-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6519(07)74882-3

  19. Maestre JM, Rudolph JW. Teorías y estilos de debriefing: el método con buen juicio como herramienta de evaluación formativa en salud. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68(4):282-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2014.05.018

  20. Plump CM, La Rosa J. Using Kahoot! in the classroom to create engagement and active learning: A game-based technology solution for eLearning novices. Manag Teach Rev. 2017;2(2):151-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298116689783

  21. Astudillo Araya Á, López Espinoza MÁ, Cádiz Medina V, Fierro Palma J, Figueroa Lara A, Vilches Parra N. Validación de la encuesta de calidad y satisfacción de simulación clínica en estudiantes de Enfermería. Cienc Enferm. 2017;23(2):133-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532017000200133

  22. Ares AM, Nozal MJ, Bernal J. Resultados de la integración de la herramienta de gamificación Kahoot! Como instrumento de evaluación en una asignatura teórica de química analítica. XXII Reunión de la Sociedad Española de Química Analítica. Valladolid: Sociedad Española de Química Analítica; 2019 [acceso 25/04/2020]. p. 142. Disponible en: https://www.seqa2019.es/sites/default/files/2019-06/06_P_DOCENCIA_0.pdf22.

  23. Miranda AR, Franchetto Sierra J, Martínez Roulet A, Rivadero L, Serra SV, Soria EA. Age, education and gender effects on Wisconsin card sorting test: standardization, reliability and validity in healthy Argentinian adults. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020;19(6):807-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2019.1693491

  24. Scotta AV, Cortez MV, Miranda AR. Insomnia is associated with worry, cognitive avoidance and low academic engagement in Argentinian university students during the COVID-19 social isolation. Psychol Health Med. 2020;31:1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2020.1869796

  25. Agra G, Formiga NS, Oliveira PSD, Costa MML, Fernandes MDGM, Nóbrega MMLD. Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel's Theory. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(1):248-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0691

  26. Keskitalo T, Ruokamo H. Students' expectations and experiences of meaningful simulation-based medical education. In Seminar.Net. 2016 [acceso 25/04/2020];12(2):111-23. Disponible en: https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/233126.

  27. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.

  28. Tejedor G, Segalàs J, Barrón Á, Fernández-Morilla M, Fuertes MT, Ruiz-Morales J, et al. Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability. 2019;11(7):2086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072086

  29. Rodríguez-Díez MC, Tejedor J, Alegre M, Campo A, Pons-Villanueva J, Díez-Goñi N. Escenarios de simulación clínica creados por alumnos de medicina: descripción de la experiencia de 2 años. Aten Primaria. 2016;48(7):501-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.09.010

  30. Ferrando-Castagnetto F, Macri E, Silva A, Padula D, Garcés G. Percepciones estudiantiles sobre las propiedades del examen clínico objetivo estructurado en Uruguay. Disponiendo un cuestionario válido para analizar la factibilidad del nuevo formato durante la transición curricular. Educación Médica. 2019;20:87-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.10.009

  31. Bicen H, Kocakoyun S. Perceptions of students for gamification approach: Kahoot as a case study. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2018;13(2):72-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i02.7467

  32. Wingo NP, Roche CC, Baker N, Dunn D, Jennings M, Pair L, et al. "Playing for Bragging Rights": A Qualitative Study of Students' Perceptions of Gamification. J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(2):79-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20190122-04

  33. Díaz PP. Gamificando con Kahoot en evaluación formativa. Rev Infanc Educ Aprendiz. 2017;3(2):112-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/ieya.2017.3.2.709

  34. Lobo V, Stromberg AQ, Rosston P. The Sound Games: Introducing Gamification into Stanford's Orientation on Emergency Ultrasound. Cureus. 2017;9(9):e1699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1699

  35. Rodríguez Zamora R, Espinoza Núñez LA. Trabajo colaborativo y estrategias de aprendizaje en entornos virtuales en jóvenes universitarios. Rev Iberoam Investig Desarro Educ. 2017;7(14):86-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v7i14.274




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com