medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2961 (Print)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cuba Enf 2022; 38 (2)

The digital technologies' contributions to patient safety in the hospital setting

de Carvalho BCAK, de Macêdo RD, Tolstenko NL

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 1-20
PDF size: 598.37 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Patient safety contributes to reducing the risk of unnecessary harm in healthcare at a minimally acceptable level. The promotion of safe care is favored by the promotion of digital technologies in healthcare practices.
Objective: To analyze the contributions of digital technologies and the goals for the promotion of patient safety in the hospital setting.
Methods: Integrative review carried out in the CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, LILACS and IBECS databases, with the use of the PICO strategy and classification of the level of evidence. The sample includes thirteen primary studies selected without temporal delimitation and written in Portuguese, English and Spanish, related with the set objective and meeting with the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were processed in the EndNote Web software. Data collection took place between October and December 2019. The Health Science Descriptors (DeCS) and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were part of the search strategies used in each database. The outcomes were analyzed descriptively.
Conclusion: Digital technologies favored the safety of hospitalized patients, which resulted in adequate communication, risk management, cost and service time reduction, safe medication practice, as well as in adverse event recording.


REFERENCES

  1. Farias QLT, Rocha SP, Cavalcante ASP, Diniz JL, Pontes Neto OAD, Vasconcelos MIO. Implicações das tecnologias de informação e comunicação no processo de educação permanente em saúde. Rev Electron Comun Inf Inov Saude. 2018 [acceso: 01/06/2020];11(4). Disponible en: https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/bitstream/icict/24033/2/13.pdf1.

  2. Ferreira AMD, Oliveira JLC, Camillo NRS, Reis GAX, Évora YDM, Matsuda LM. Perceptions of nursing professionals about the use of patient safety computerization. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2019 [acceso: 01/06/2020];40(esp):e20180140. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/rgenf/v40nspe/en_1983-1447-rgenf-40-spe-e20180140.pdf2.

  3. Costa JWS, Assis JMM, Melo MDM, Xavier SSM, Melo GSM, Costa IKF. Technologies involved in the promotion of patient safety in the medication process: an integrative review. Cogitare Enferm. 2017 [acceso: 01/06/2020];22(2):e45608. Disponible en: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/view/45608/pdf_en3.

  4. Kleib M, Simpson N, Rhodes B. Information and communication technology: design, delivery, and outcomes from a nursing informatics boot camp. Online J Issues Nurs. 2016 [acceso: 01/02/2020];21(2):5. Disponible en: http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-21-2016/No2-May-2016/Information-and-Communication-Technology.html4.

  5. Mota DN, Torres RAM, Guimarães JMX, Marinho MNASB, Araújo AF. Tecnologias da informação e comunicação: influências no trabalho da estratégia Saúde da Família. J Health Inform. 2018 [acceso: 16/02/2020];10(2):45-9. Disponible en: http://www.jhi-sbis.saude.ws/ojs-jhi/index.php/jhi-sbis/article/viewFile/563/3305.

  6. Lima Neto AV, Silva MD, Pereira Santos VE. Contribuições das tecnologias em saúde para a segurança do paciente. Rev Cubana Enferm 2019 [acceso: 16/02/2020];35(4). Disponible en: http://www.revenfermeria.sld.cu/index.php/enf/article/view/21256.

  7. Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Integrative literature review: a research method to incorporate evidence in health care and nursing. Texto Contexto Enferm, Florianópolis, 2008;17(4):758-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-070720080004000187.

  8. Lockwood C, Porrit K, Munn Z, Rittenmeyer L, Salmond S, Bjerrum M, et al. Chapter 2: systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. Joanna Briggs Institute reviewer's manual Australia: Joanna Briggs Institute, 2017 [acceso: 16/02/2020]. Disponible en: https://wiki.joannabriggs.org/display/MANUAL/Chapter+2%3A+Systematic+reviews+of+qualitative+evidence8.

  9. Mendes KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Use of the bibliographic reference manager in the selection of primary studies in integrative reviews. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2019 [acceso: 26/02/2020];28:e20170204. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v28/1980-265X-tce-28-e20170204.pdf9.

  10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review sand meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 [acceso: 06/06/2020];6(9):e1000097. Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&type=printable10.

  11. Marziale MH. Instrumento para recolección de datos revisión integrativa São Paulo: RedENSO; 2015 [acceso: 26/02/2020]. Disponible en: http://gruposdepesquisa.eerp.usp.br/sites/redenso/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2019/09/Instrumiento_revision_litetarura_RedENSO_2015.pdf

  12. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. 4nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Healths; 2019.

  13. 21. Moreno MAC, Casuso IM, Pereda VR, Etxenike LG, de Elguea Díaz FJO, García RA. Satisfacción de las enfermeras de Osakidetza con las aplicaciones móviles para el cuidado enfermero. Metas Enferm. 2018 [acceso: 16/02/2020];21(5):7. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=643926313. 21.

  14. Ramírez Pérez JF, Rodríguez Rodríguez T, Olivera Fajardo D, Morejón Valdes M. Componente para la toma de decisiones en salud. Un enfoque de análisis de redes sociales desde la minería de procesos. Rev Cuba Inform Méd. 2016 [acceso: 16/02/2020];8(1):46-63. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rcim/v8n1/rcim04116.pdf14.

  15. Rebollo Rodrigo H, Gómez Ruiz M, Gutiérrez G, Gómez Fleitas M, Vélez García O, Medrazo Leal C. Programa informático para minimizar los riesgos en los servicios quirúrgicos An IT tool for risk management in surgical services. Evolución de pacientes con diabetes mellitus en diálisis peritoneal. Salud(i)ciência (Impressa). 2013 [acceso: 16/02/2020];20(2):123-7. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fabiana_Silva_e_Dutra/publication/250309610_Evaluation_of_the_different_domains_of_biopsychosocial_model_of_the_International_Classification_of_Functioning_Disability_and_Health/links/0f3175359aca36519e000000.pdf#page=1415.

  16. Menon R, Rivett C. Time-motion analysis examining of the impact of Medic Bleep, an instant messaging platform, versus the traditional pager: a prospective pilot study. Digit Health. 2019;5. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/205520761983181216.

  17. Hassan E. Tele-ICU and patient safety considerations. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2018 [acceso: 16/02/2020];41(1):47-59. Disponible en: https://journals.lww.com/ccnq/Abstract/2018/01000/Tele_ICU_and_Patient_Safety_Considerations.6.aspx17.

  18. Raptis DA, Fernandes C, Chua W, Boulos PB. Electronic software significantly improves quality of handover in a London teaching hospital. Health Informatics J. 2009;15(3):191-8. DOI: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/146045820933743118.

  19. Schmidt PE, Meredith P, Prytherch DR, Watson D, Watson V, Killen RM, et al. Impact of introducing an electronic physiological surveillance system on hospital mortality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 [acceso: 26/02/2020];24(1):10-20. Disponible en: https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/qhc/24/1/10.full.pdf19.

  20. Vicente Oliveros N, Gramage Caro T, Pérez Menendez-Conde C, Álvarez-Díaz AM, Martín-Aragón AS, Bermejo Vicedo T, et al. Effect of an electronic medication administration record application on patient safety. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(4):888-94. DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jep.1275320.

  21. Nikolic A, Wickramasinghe N, Claydon-Platt D, Balakrishnan V, Smart P. The use of communication apps by medical staff in the Australian health care system: survey study on prevalence and use. JMIR Med Inform. 2018 [acceso: 26/02/2020];6(1):e9. Disponible en: https://medinform.jmir.org/2018/1/e9/21.

  22. Saluvan M, Ozonoff A. Functionality of hospital information systems: results from a survey of quality directors at Turkish hospitals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 [acceso: 26/02/2020];18(1):6. Disponible en: https://bmcmedinformdecismak.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12911-018-0581-222.

  23. Vaisman A, Wu RC. Analysis of smartphone interruptions on academic general internal medicine wards. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 [acceso: 16/02/2020];26(01):1-11. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC537374923. /

  24. Lesselroth B, Adams S, Felder R, Dorr DA, Cauthers P, Church V, et al. Using consumer-based kiosk technology to improve and standardize medication reconciliation in a specialty care setting. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 [acceso: 26/02/2020];35(5):264-70. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S155372500935037024.

  25. Moores M, Anwyl D, Connolly P, Anslow L, Monaghan H, Hughes D, et al. IT-driven patient safety at the heart of radiology service improvement. Med Inform Internet Med. 2005;30(2):123-33. DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1463923050029909725.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com