medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3046 (Electronic)

2022, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Med Mil 2022; 51 (2)

Factors associated with right bundle branch block in older adults

Rentería-Cabrejos MJ, Picón-Reátegui CK, Rojas-Alvarado AB, Bulnes-Alvarez SP, Pereira-Victorio CJ, Valladares-Garrido MJ

Language: Spanish
References: 31
Page:
PDF size: 275.37 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: There is little literature on the association between right bundle branch block and risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes in patients in Latin America and Peru.
Objective: To determine the factors associated with right bundle branch block in older adults.
Methods: Analytical cross-sectional study completed by 376 elderly patients treated at Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo Hospital, Lambayeque-Peru. The dependent variable was the presence of right bundle branch block, and the independent variables were age, sex, history of hypertension, and diabetes. Prevalence ratios and 95 % confidence intervals were estimated.
Results: Of 376 patients, the majority were male (55,9 %), the mean age was 75,6 years, 11,4 % had a history of hypertension and 9 % were diabetic; 41 % had a diagnosis of right bundle branch block. In simple regression, the frequency of right bundle branch block was 56 % (PR= 1,56; 95 % CI: 1,22-1,99), 65 % (PR=1,65; 95 % CI: 1,26 - 2,15) and 59 % (PR= 1,59; CI 95 %: 1,18 - 2,14) higher in women, hypertensive and diabetics; respectively. In the multiple regression; female sex (PR= 1,53; 95 % CI: 1,21 - 1,95), history of hypertension (PR= 1,55; 95 % CI: 1,21 - 2,00) and diabetes mellitus (PR= 1,49; 95 % CI: 1,12 - 2,00) were positively associated with right bundle branch block. The nested model selected the variables: female sex (PR= 1,54; 95 % CI: 1,21 - 1,96) and history of arterial hypertension (PR= 1,61; 95 % CI: 1,25 - 2,08).
Conclusion: Female sex, history of arterial hypertension and diabetes mellitus were positively associated with presenting right bundle branch block in older adults.


REFERENCES

  1. Fauci AS, Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Hauser SL, Longo DL, Jameson JL, et al. Harrison-Principios de Medicina Interna. 14ª edición. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1998.

  2. Alventosa-Zaidin M, Font LG, Camps MB, Saumell CR, Pera G, Sas MTA, et al. Right bundle branch block: Prevalence, incidence, and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population. The European Journal of General Practice. 2019 [acceso: 15/01/2022] 25(3):109-15. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31339387/ 2.

  3. Yeh SS-F, Chen C-YJ, Wu I-C, Hsu C-C, Chen T-Y, Tseng W-T, et al. Prognostic value and prevalence of complete right bundle branch block in an elderly population: a community-based 10-year prospective study. Aging (Albany NY). 2020 [acceso: 15/01/2022];12(19): 19073-82. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC7732323/ 3.

  4. Jeong JH, Kim JH, Park YH, Han DC, Hwang KW, Lee DW, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for bundle branch block in adults older than 40 years. Korean J Intern Med. 2004 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 19(3): 171-8. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15481609/ 4.

  5. Alventosa-Zaidin M, Roca Saumell C, Brugada Terradellas J. Right bundle branch block and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in healthy patients. Medicina Clínica (English Edition). 2018 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 151(10):402-11. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30139583/ 5.

  6. Bussink BE, Holst AG, Jespersen L, Deckers JW, Jensen GB, Prescott E. Right bundle branch block: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome in the general population: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. European Heart Journal.2013 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 34(2): 138-46. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22947613/ 6.

  7. Thrainsdottir IS, Hardarson T, Thorgeirsson G, Sigvaldason H, Sigfusson N. The epidemiology of right bundle branch block and its association with cardiovascular morbidity - The Reykjavik Study. European Heart Journal .1993 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 14(12):1590-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8131755/ 7.

  8. Movahed M-R. Diabetes as a risk factor for cardiac conduction defects: a review. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2007 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 9(3): 276-81. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17391152/ 8.

  9. Figueroa-Triana JF, Mora-Pabón G, Quitian-Moreno J, Álvarez-Gaviria M, Idrovo C, Cabrera JS, et al. Acute myocardial infarction with right bundle branch block at presentation: Prevalence and mortality. Journal of Electrocardiology. 2021 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 66: 38-42. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33770645/ 9.

  10. Awamleh García P, Alonso Martín JJ, Jiménez Hernández RM, Graupner Abad C, Talavera Calle P, Serrano Antolín J, et al. Hallazgos electrocardiográficos anormales en la población mayor de 40 años. Prevalencia y significación clínica. Resultados del estudio OFRECE. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2019 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 72(10): 820-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.revespcardiol.org/es-hallazgos-electrocardiograficos-anormales-poblacion-mayor-articulo-S0300893218305608 10.

  11. Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F. Alteraciones electrocardiográficas y factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2. Salud pública Méx. 1999[acceso: 15/01/2022]; 41(1): 12-7. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0036-36341999000100003&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es 11.

  12. Xiong Y, Wang L, Liu W, Hankey GJ, Xu B, Wang S. The Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. 2015 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 38(10): 604-13. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.2245412.

  13. Xiang L, Zhong A, You T, Chen J, Xu W, Shi M. Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2016 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 22: 998-1004. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27017617/ 13.

  14. Haataja P, Anttila I, Nikus K, Eskola M, Huhtala H, Nieminen T, et al. Prognostic implications of intraventricular conduction delays in a general population: The Health 2000 Survey. Ann Med. 2015 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 47(1): 74-80. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25613171/ 14.

  15. Zhang Z, Rautaharju PM, Soliman EZ, Manson JE, Cain ME, Martin LW, et al. Mortality Risk Associated With Bundle Branch Blocks and Related Repolarization Abnormalities (from the Women's Health Initiative [WHI]). The American Journal of Cardiology. 2012 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 110(10): 1489-95. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22858187/ 15.

  16. Schneider JF, Thomas HE, Kreger BE, McNamara PM, Sorlie P, Kannel WB. Newly acquired right bundle-branch block: The Framingham Study. Ann Intern Med. 1980 [acceso:15/01/2022]; 92(1): 37-44. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7350871/ 16.

  17. Fleg JL, Das DN, Lakatta EG. Right bundle branch block: Long-Term prognosis in apparently healthy men. Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 1(3): 887-92. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6826977/ 17.

  18. Eriksson P, Wilhelmsen L, Rosengren A. Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years. Eur Heart J. 2005 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 26(21): 2300-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16214833/ 18.

  19. Fahy GJ, Pinski SL, Miller DP, Mc Cabe N, Pye C, Walsh MJ, et al. Natural history of isolated bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1996 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 77(14): 1185-90. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8651093/ 19.

  20. Loring Z, Caños DA, Selzman K, Herz ND, Silverman H, MaCurdy TE, et al. Left Bundle Branch Block Predicts Better Survival in Women Than Men Receiving Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. JACC: Heart Failure. 2013 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 1(3):237-44. Disponible en: https://www.jacc.org/doi/abs/10.1016/j.jchf.2013.03.00520.

  21. Gaba P, Pedrotty D, DeSimone CV, Bonikowske AR, Allison TG, Kapa S. Mortality in Patients With Right Bundle-Branch Block in the Absence of Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 9(19): e017430. Disponible en: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.01743021.

  22. Harkness WT, Hicks M. Right Bundle Branch Block. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2022. [acceso: 15/01/2022]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507872/22.

  23. Eriksson P, Hansson P-O, Eriksson H, Dellborg M. Bundle-Branch Block in a General Male Population: The Study of Men Born 1913. Circulation. 1998 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 98(22): 2494-500.Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9832497/ 23.

  24. Ohmae M, Rabkin SW. Hyperkalemia-induced bundle branch block and complete heart block. Clin Cardiol. 1981 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 4(1): 43-6. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7226590/ 24.

  25. de Castroviejo EVR, Perales CS, López JL, García Cortés MJ, Extremera VA, Herrera MG, et al. Prevalence and Predisposing Factors for Bundle Branch Block in Patients Starting Dialysis. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 61(7): 719-25. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://www.revespcardiol.org/es-prevalence-of-and-predisposing-factors-articulo-13124411 25.

  26. Pantazopoulos JS, David A, Kostis WJ, Cosgrove NM, Kostis JB. Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with intraventricular conduction blocks: A sixteen-year follow-up in a state-wide database. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2017 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 58(3): 194-201. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27965025/ 26.

  27. Seclen SN, Rosas ME, Arias AJ, Medina CA. Elevated incidence rates of diabetes in Peru: report from PERUDIAB, a national urban population-based longitudinal study. BMJ Open Diab Res Care. 2017 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 5(1): e000401. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28878935/ 27.

  28. Ccorahua-Ríos MS, Atamari-Anahui N, Miranda-Abarca I, Campero-Espinoza AB, Rondón-Abuhadba EA, Pereira-Victorio CJ. Type 2 diabetes mellitus prevalence between 2005 and 2018 in population under 30 using data from the Ministry of Health of Peru. Medwave. 2019 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 19(10): e7723-e7723. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31887109/ 28.

  29. Guerrero-Díaz DV, Hernández-Vásquez A, Montoya-Rivera WC, Rojas-Roque C, Chacón Díaz MA, Bendezu-Quispe G. Undiagnosed hypertension in Peru: analysis of associated factors and socioeconomic inequalities, 2019. Heliyon. 2021 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 7(7): e07516. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34296015/ 29.

  30. Marín DE-, Ramos CFR, Miranda-Arboleda A, Castilla-Agudelo G, Saldarriaga-Giraldo C. Patrones electrocardiográficos de alto riesgo en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo. Archivos Peruanos de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. 2020[acceso: 15/01/2022]; 1(4): 240-9. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://apcyccv.org.pe/index.php/apccc/article/view/82 30.

  31. Birnbaum Y, Fiol M, Nikus K, Niebla JG, Bacharova L, Dubner S, et al. A counterpoint paper: Comments on the electrocardiographic part of the 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. J Electrocardiol. 2020 [acceso: 15/01/2022]; 60: 142-7. Disponible en: Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32361523/ 31.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com