medigraphic.com

2024, Number 1

Next >>

Revista Colombiana de Bioética 2024; 19 (1)

Opinion and level of information on the National Gender Identity Law and progressive autonomy in adolescents in school: A perspective from Bioethics

Galassi C, Ituarte M, Mainetti MM, Echeverría J

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1-15
PDF size: 185.49 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Purpose/Context: In the context of the current social and legal transformations regarding gender, the objective of the research is to explore and analyze the opinion and level of information that high school students have about the rights stipulated in the National Gender Identity Law No. 26743 and about progressive autonomy, from a bioethical point of view.
Methodology/Approach: An exploratory-descriptive, cross-sectional design was used with a mixed approach, with quantitative and qualitative data. As part of this, a purposive sample of 100 students between 17 and 18 years of age, from the cities of Necochea and Mar del Plata (Buenos Aires, Argentina) was formed. The participants answered a survey specifically designed for this research, with open and closed questions, online.
Results/Findings: The results showed a low level of information on the Law and the principle of progressive autonomy, with the internet and social networks being the main source of information. Regarding the opinion on the rights stipulated in the Law and the principle of progressive autonomy, interest in this topic and a positive evaluation of its knowledge and teaching were observed.
Discussion/Conclusions/Contributions: These results raised questions about the role of the secondary school in the training on these issues and may contribute to improve educational strategies and policies on this relevant social issue. Likewise, the bioethical perspective offers elements for this, by problematizing naturalized cultural constructions on gender, and to think about this issue also in infancy in order to guarantee the best interests of children.


REFERENCES

  1. Cabrera Diaz, Esperanza. 2011. “Concepciones bioéticas de la cultura occidentalsobre la autonomía de niños y niñas.” Revista Colombiana de Bioética 6, no. 2:44-61. https://doi.org/10.18270/rcb.v6i2.827

  2. Casado, María. 1996. Materiales de Bioética y Derecho. Barcelona: Cedecs Editorial.

  3. Fernández, Silvia Eugenia. 2015. “La responsabilidad parental en el Código Civily Comercial ¿Cuánto de autonomía progresiva? Construyendo equilibrios.” LaLey, 181-196. https://tsjrn.opac.com.ar/pergamo/documento.php?ui=2&recno=

  4. 47461&id=TSJRN.2.474614. Gómez Sánchez, Pío. 2015. “Principios básicos de bioética.” Revista Peruana de Ginecologíay Obstetricia 55, no. 4: 230-233. https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v55i297

  5. Hernández Sampieri, Roberto, Carlos Fernández Collado y Pilar Baptista Lucio.2010. Metodología de Investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.

  6. La Rocca, Susana, María Marta Mainetti y Juan Pablo Issel. 2010. “Libertad, igualdad y¿Fraternidad? En el paradigma de la bioética Latinoamericana. El aporte de la éticadialógica y de la ética de la liberación.” El Ágora USB 10, no. 2: 483-494.

  7. Ley Nacional de Identidad de Género n.° 26.743, 23 de mayo de 2012. Congreso Argentino.

  8. Mainetti, María Marta, Susana La Rocca y Juan Pablo Isseliv. 2019. “Descolonizandosaberes para intervenir en las prácticas. BioétiEca, derechos humanos eidentidad de género.” Revista RedBioética/Unesco 1, no. 19: 148-158.

  9. Marín Castán, María Luisa. 2015. “En torno a la dignidad humana como fundamentode la Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos dela Unesco.” Revista de Bioética y Derecho: 125‐145. https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2015.Extra.14705

  10. Menin, Francisco. 2015. “La identidad de género como derecho humano: la legislaciónArgentina.” Anuario de derecho constitucional latinoamericano: 627-641.Bogotá: Fundación Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.

  11. Rojas, Alberto y Libia Lara. 2014. “¿Ética, bioética o ética médica?” Revista Chilenade Enfermedades Respiratorias 30, no. 2: 91-94.

  12. Siurana Aparisi, Juan Carlos. 2010. “Los principios de la bioética y el surgimientode una bioética intercultural.” Veritas 22: 121-157. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-92732010000100006

  13. Saldivia Menajovsky, Laura. 2018. “La bioética despatologizadora del derecho ala identidad de género.” En Bioética laica. Vida, muerte, género, reproducción yfamilia, coordinado por Pauline Capdevielle y María de Jesús Medina Arellano,137-153. México: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.

  14. Unesco. 2005. Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos. París: Unesco.

  15. Venegas Sepúlveda, Paula Andrea. 2010. “Autonomía progresiva: el niño comosujeto de derechos.” Tesis de pregrado, Universidad de Chile.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com