medigraphic.com
ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Simulación Clínica 2024; 6 (3)

Simulation-based education, an active learning methodology through experience and reflection

Díaz-Guio DA, Vasco M, Ferrero F, Ricardo-Zapata A

Language: Spanish
References: 64
Page: 119-126
PDF size: 395.57 Kb.


ABSTRACT

simulation-based education (SBE), constructivism, clinical simulation, debriefing, instructional design.


REFERENCES

  1. Díaz-Guio DA, Rojas M, Ricardo-Zapata A. Reflections on teacher identity: epistemological perspectives on clinical simulation. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia - Serie de Conferencias. 2023; 2.

  2. Atkinson R, Shiffrin R. Human memory: a proposed system and its control processes. In: Spence K, Spence J, editor. The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press. Inc; 1968.

  3. Díaz-Guío DA, Cimadevilla-Calvo B. Educación basada en simulación: debriefing, sus fundamentos, bondades y dificultades. Simulación Clínica. 2019; 1 (2): 95-103.

  4. Díaz-Guio DA, Ruiz-Ortega FJ. Relationship among mental models, theories of change, and metacognition: structured clinical simulation. Colomb J Anesthesiol. 2019; 47 (14): 113-116. doi: 10.1097/CJ9.0000000000000107.

  5. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004; 79 (10 Suppl): S70-S81.

  6. Maestre J, Szyld D, del Moral I, Ortiz G, Rudolph JW. La formación de expertos clínicos: la práctica reflexiva. Rev Clin Esp. 2014; 214 (4): 216-220.

  7. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc. 2014; 9 (6): 339-349.

  8. Ferrero F, Díaz-Guio DA. Educación basada en simulación: polemizando bases teóricas de la formación docente. Simulación Clínica. 2021; 3 (1): 35-39.

  9. Amineh RJ, Asl HD. Review of constructivism and social constructivism. JSSLL. 2015; 1 (1): 9-16.

  10. Hyslop-Margison EJ, Strobel J. Constructivism and education: misunderstandings and pedagogical implications. Teach Educ. 2007; 43 (1): 72-86.

  11. Dewey J. How we think. Endymion Press; 2016. p. 224.

  12. Hébert C. Knowing and/or experiencing: a critical examination of the reflective models of John Dewey and Donald Schon. Reflective Pract. 2015; 16 (3): 361-371.

  13. Granovsky P. Zona de desarrollo próximo y la formación profesional. Laboreal. 2018;14 (2): 116-118.

  14. Chan TM, Gottlieb M, Sherbino J, Boysen-Osborn M, Papanagnou D, Yarris LM. Education theory made practical. 1st ed. Vol. 1. San Francisco: Academic Life in Emergency Medicine; 2017.

  15. Watts PI, McDermott DS, Alinier G, Charnetski M, Ludlow J, Horsley E, et al. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Simulation Design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58: 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.009.

  16. Persico L, Belle A, DiGregorio H, Wilson-Keates B, Shelton C. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice facilitation. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58: 22-26.

  17. Diaz-Navarro C, Armstrong R, Charnetski M, Freeman KJ, Koh S, Reedy G, et al. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare. Adv Simul (Lond). 2024; 9 (1): 19.

  18. Chiniara G, Cole G, Brisbin K, Huffman D, Cragg B, Lamacchia M, et al. Simulation in healthcare: a taxonomy and a conceptual framework for instructional design and media selection. Med Teach. 2013; 35 (8): e1380-1395.

  19. Roussin CJ, Weinstock P. SimZones: an organizational innovation for simulation programs and centers. Acad Med. 2017; 92 (8): 1114-1120.

  20. Coggins A, Zaklama R, Szabo RA, Diaz-Navarro C, Scalese RJ, Krogh K, et al. Twelve tips for facilitating and implementing clinical debriefing programmes. Med Teach. 2021; 43 (5): 509-517. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1817349.

  21. Nestel D, Mobley BL, Hunt EA, Eppich WJ. Confederates in health care simulations: Not as simple as it seems. Clin Simul Nurs. 2014; 10 (12): 611-616. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2014.09.007.

  22. Khamis NN, Satava RM, Alnassar SA, Kern DE. A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30 (1): 279-287.

  23. Mcgriff SJ. Instructional System Design (ISD): using the ADDIE model. Instructional Systems, College of Education, Penn State University. 2000; 2. Available from: https://www.lib.purdue.edu/sites/default/files/directory/butler38/ADDIE.pdf

  24. Díaz-Guio DA, Arias-Botero JH, Álvarez C, Gaitán-Buitrago MH, Ricardo-Zapata A, Cárdenas L, et al. Telesimulación en la formación en medicina perioperatoria desde la perspectiva colombiana. Simulación Clínica. 2021; 3 (3): 110-116.

  25. Patel SR, Margolies PJ, Covell NH, Lipscomb C, Dixon LB. Using instructional design, analyze, design, develop, implement, and evaluate, to develop e-learning modules to disseminate supported employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment Programs in New York State. Front Public Health. 2018; 6: 113.

  26. Charnetski M, Jarvill M. Healthcare simulation standards of best practice operations. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58: 33-39.

  27. Comenio J. Didáctica Magna. Octava. México: Editorial Porrúa; 1998. p. 1-133.

  28. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Adm Sci Q. 1999; 44 (2): 350-383.

  29. Lateef F. Maximizing learning and creativity: understanding psychological safety in simulation-based learning. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020; 13 (1): 5-14.

  30. Frazier ML, Fainshmidt S, Klinger RL, Pezeshkan A, Vracheva V. Psychological safety: a meta-analytic review and extension. Pers Psychol. 2017; 70 (1): 113-165.

  31. Chi MTH, Wylie R. The ICAP Framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ Psychol. 2014; 49 (4): 219-243.

  32. Somerville SG, Harrison NM, Lewis SA. Twelve tips for the pre-brief to promote psychological safety in simulation-based education. Med Teach. 2023; 45 (12): 1349-1356.

  33. Boet S, Bould MD, Layat Burn C, Reeves S. Twelve tips for a successful interprofessional team-based high-fidelity simulation education session. Med Teach. 2014; 36 (10): 853-857.

  34. Fritz PZ, Gray T, Flanagan B. Review of mannequin-based high-fidelity simulation in emergency medicine. Emerg Med Australas. 2008; 20 (1): 1-9.

  35. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2 (3): 183-193.

  36. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Dufresne RL, Raemer DB. There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simul Healthc. 2006; 1 (1): 49-55.

  37. Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15 (11): 1010-1016.

  38. Ossenberg C, Henderson A, Mitchell M. What attributes guide best practice for effective feedback? A scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2019; 24 (2): 383-401. doi: 10.1007/s10459-018-9854-x.

  39. Boursicot K, Kemp S, Wilkinson T, Findyartini A, Canning C, Cilliers F, et al. Performance assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the 2020 Ottawa Conference. Med Teach. 2021; 43 (1): 58-67. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1830052.

  40. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Vol. 77. Review of Educational Research. SAGE Publications Inc.; 2007. p. 81-112.

  41. van de Ridder JMM, Mcgaghie WC, Stokking KM, ten Cate OTJ. Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta-review. Vol. 49. Medical Education; 2015. p. 658-673.

  42. Riviere E, Jaffrelot M, Jouquan J, Chiniara G. Debriefing for the transfer of learning. Acad Med. 2019; 94 (6): 803.

  43. Brett-Fleegler M, Rudolph J, Eppich W, Monuteaux M, Fleegler E, Cheng A, et al. Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare: development and psychometric properties. Simul Healthc. 2012; 7 (5): 288-294.

  44. Johnson-Laird P. Mental Models. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1983. p. 513.

  45. Johnson-Laird P. Mental models and human reasoning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107 (43): 18243-18250.

  46. Mathieu JE, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000; 85 (2): 273-283.

  47. Gardner AK, Scott DJ, AbdelFattah KR. Do great teams think alike? An examination of team mental models and their impact on team performance. Surgery. 2017; 161 (5): 1203-1208.

  48. Burtscher MJ, Manser T. Team mental models and their potential to improve teamwork and safety: A review and implications for future research in healthcare. Saf Sci. 2012; 50 (5): 1344-1354.

  49. Fraser KL, Meguerdichian MJ, Haws JT, Grant VJ, Bajaj K, Cheng A. Cognitive Load Theory for debriefing simulations: implications for faculty development. Adv Simul (Lond). 2018; 3: 28. doi: 10.1186/s41077-018-0086-1.

  50. Fraser K, McLaughlin K. Temporal pattern of emotions and cognitive load during simulation training and debriefing. Med Teach. 2019; 41(2): 1-6.

  51. O'Shea CI, Schnieke-Kind C, Pugh D, Picton E. The Meta-Debrief Club: an effective method for debriefing your debrief. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020; 6 (2): 118-120.

  52. Kolbe M, Rudolph JW. What's the headline on your mind right now? How reflection guides simulation-based faculty development in a master class. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2018; 4 (3): 126-132. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000247.

  53. Papapanou M, Routsi E, Tsamakis K, Fotis L, Marinos G, Lidoriki I, et al. Medical education challenges and innovations during COVID-19 pandemic. Postgrad Med J. 2022; 98 (1159): 321-327.

  54. Díaz-Guio D, Ospina-Vélez J, Ricardo-Zapata A. COVID-19: una crisis que requiere medidas de formación urgentes. Simulación Clínica. 2020; 2 (1): 6-8.

  55. Díaz-Guio DA, Ríos-Barrientos E, Santillán-Roldan PA, Díaz-Gómez AS, Ricardo-Zapata A, Mora-Martinez S, et al. Online-synchronized clinical simulation: an efficient teaching-learning option for the COVID-19 pandemic time and beyond. Adv Simul (Lond). 2021; 6 (1): 30. doi: 10.1186/s41077-021-00183-z.

  56. Hannan TA, Umar SY, Rob Z, Choudhury RR. Designing and running an online Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) on Zoom: a peer-led example. Med Teach. 2021; 43 (6): 651-655. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1887836.

  57. Díaz-Guio DA, Ricardo-Zapata A, Ospina-Velez J, Gómez-Candamil G, Mora-Martinez S, Rodriguez-Morales A. Cognitive load and performance of health care professionals in donning and doffing PPE before and after a simulation-based educational intervention and its implications during the COVID-19 pandemic for biosafety. Infez Med. 2020; 28 (Suppl 1): 111-117.

  58. Dubovi I, Levy ST, Dagan E. Now I know how! The learning process of medication administration among nursing students with non-immersive desktop virtual reality simulation. Comput Educ. 2017; 113: 16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.009.

  59. Huun K. Virtual simulations in online nursing education: align with quality matters. Clin Simul Nurs. 2018; 22: 26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2018.07.002.

  60. Kononowicz AA, Woodham LA, Edelbring S, Stathakarou N, Davies D, Saxena N, et al. Virtual patient simulations in health professions education: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21 (7): 1-20.

  61. Ouyang F, Jiao P. Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. 2021; 2 (100020): 100020.

  62. Tolsgaard MG, Pusic MV, Sebok-Syer SS, Gin B, Svendsen MB, Syer MD, et al. The fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 156. Med Teach. 2023; 45 (6): 565-573.

  63. Rodríguez A, Sambuceti C, Gaitán MH, Díaz-Guio DA. Inteligencia artificial como copiloto en el diseño de casos, experiencias en dos centros de simulación latinoamericanos. Simulación Clínica. 2023; 5 (3): 91-95.

  64. Díaz-Guio DA, Henao J, Pantoja A, Arango MA, Díaz-Gómez AS, Gómez AC. Artificial intelligence, applications and challenges in simulation-based education. Colomb J Anesthesiol. 2024; 52 (1).




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com