medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía de Columna

ISSN 2992-7749 (Electronic)
ISSN 2992-7897 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de difusión científica de la Asociación Mexicana de Cirujanos de Columna A. C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Políticas
    • Políticas éticas
    • Políticas de acceso abierto
    • Políticas de revisión de manuscritos
    • Políticas editoriales generales
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Columna 2025; 3 (1)

Functional assessment of postoperative patients undergoing posterolateral fusion L4-S1 at the General Regional Hospital No.1

Márquez CCJ, Méndez CEA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/118942

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/118942
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/118942

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 23-30
PDF size: 242.17 Kb.


Key words:

Oswestry, posterolateral fusion, lumbar stenosis, conservative treatment, disability.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: lumbar stenosis encompasses a wide range of conditions that lead to medical attention at the primary and secondary levels of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. Furthermore, we must consider that a significant portion of these patients will eventually require spinal surgery if they do not respond to an initial conservative treatment, which ideally should be administered for at least six months. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) assesses the functional limitation of patients with spinal pathology and is considered the reference method for diagnosing lower back functionality. Furthermore, it has predictive value for the chronicity of pain and the outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments Objective: to evaluate the clinical and functional evolution of patients with lumbar stenosis postoperatively undergoing posterolateral fusion 4-S1 at the General Regional Hospital No. 1. Material and methods: sixty-six patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent 4-S1 posterolateral fusion were assessed using the Oswestry questionnaire before the surgical intervention and one month afterward. This evaluation measured the degree of disability before and after the spinal surgery. Additionally, epidemiological data will be collected, including age, occupation (and work disability if applicable), risk factors (smoking, body mass index), comorbidities, as well as previous treatments and their duration. Results: The mean age was 52 years, with a predominance of male patients and an average BMI of 29 kg/m². The primary reason for surgery was low back pain, with an average duration of 3.8 years. Only three patients had undergone rehabilitation before the intervention, and 35 patients were on work-related disability at the time of surgery. Before the intervention, most patients presented limitations in daily and occupational activities as measured by the Oswestry Index. Following surgery, moderate disability was the most frequently observed outcome. A total of 82% of patients showed improvement. Conclusions: posterolateral fusion appears to be a treatment that offers significant improvement in functionality and pain relief for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The variability in treatment response suggests that individualized strategies should be considered for each patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Herkowitz HN, Garfin SR, Eismont FJ, Bell GR, Balderston RA. Rothman-Simeone The Spine. 7th ed. Londres, Inglaterra: Elsevier; 2018. p. 17-56.

  2. Oliveira C, Navarro-García R, Ruiz-Caballero JA, Brito-Ojeda E. Biomecánica de la columna vertebral. Canar Méd Quir. 2007; 4: 35-43.

  3. Rosales LM, Manzur D, Miramontes MV, Alpízar AA, Reyes-Sánchez AA Acta Médica. Conducto lumbar estrecho. Acta Med. 2006; 4: 101-110.

  4. Kushchayev SV, Glushko T, Jarraya M, Schuleri KH, Preul MC, Brooks ML, et al. ABCs of the degenerative spine. Insights Imaging. 2018; 9: 253-274.

  5. Bertilson BC, Bring J, Sjoblom A, Sundell K, Strender LE. Inter-examiner reliability in the assessment of low back pain (LBP) using the Kirkaldy-Willis classification (KWC). Eur Spine J, 2006; 15: 1695-1703.

  6. Sabri SA, Ganapathy V, Kluemper C. Pathophysiology and clinical presentation of lumbar stenosis. Semin Spine Surg. 2019; 31: 1-5.

  7. Cruz-Medina E, León-Hernández SR, Arellano-Hernández A, Martínez-Gonzaga E, García-Guerrero E, Coronado-Zarco R. Evaluación isocinética y estado funcional en pacientes posoperados por hernia de disco lumbar. Cir Cir. 2008; 76: 373-380.

  8. Kent PM, Keating JL. The epidemiology of low back pain in primary care. Chiropr Osteopat. 2005; 13: 1-7.

  9. Durán-Nah JJ, Benítez-Rodríguez CR, Miam-Viana EJ. Lumbalgia crónica y factores de riesgo asociados en derechohabientes del IMSS: estudio de casos y controles. Orig Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2016; 54: 421-428.

  10. Valenzuela-Flores AA, Medina-Rodríguez F, Torres-González R, Elizalde-Martínez E, López-Valencia J, Taboada Gallardo GE, et al. Protocolo de Atención Integral de Lumbalgia Inespecífica. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. México. 2023. Disponible en: https://imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/profesionalesSalud/investigacionSalud/historico/programas/14-pai-lumbalgia-inespecifica.pdf

  11. Urits I, Burstein A, Sharma M, Testa L, Gold PA, Orhurhu V, et al. Low back pain, a comprehensive review: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019; 23: 1-10.

  12. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, Tansey R, Wardlaw D, Smith FW, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35: 1919-1924.

  13. Caumo F, Macaneiro CH, Miyamoto RK, Lauffer RF, Santos RAA. Improvement of ODI and SF-36 questionnaires score after one year of PLIF or TLIF. Coluna/Columna. 2019; 18: 318-321.

  14. Teles AR, Khoshhal KI, Falavigna A. Why and how should we measure outcomes in spine surgery? J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2016; 11: 91-97.

  15. Lee CP, Fu TS, Liu CY, Hung CI. Psychometric evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and Mokken analyses. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15: 1-7.

  16. Yates M, Shastri-Hurst N. The oswestry disability index. Occup Med (Chi III). 2017; 67: 241-242.

  17. Mcneely EL, Zhang B, Neuman B, Skolasky RL. Estimating measurement error of Menewestry Disability Index with missing data. Dep Heal Hum Serv. 2022; 22: 975-982.

  18. Uruchi-Limachi DM, Sea-Aramayo JM. Evaluación funcional mediante la escala de Oswestry en pacientes con artrodesis posterolateral por canal lumbar estrecho. Rev Méd La Paz. 2017; 23: 6-12.

  19. Alcántara-Bumbiedro S, Flórez-García MT, Echávarri-Pérez C, García-Pérez F. Escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry. Rehabilitación. 2006; 40: 150-158.

  20. García-Galicia A, Vázquez-Roblero JA, Corpus-Mariscal E, García-Navarro JL, Montiel-Jarquín ÁJ, Loría-Castellanos J. Evaluación funcional y del dolor en pacientes con deformidad espinal manejados quirúrgicamente. Cir Cir. 2020; 88: 708-713.

  21. Romero-Vargas S, Obil-Chavarria C, Zárate-Kalfopolus B, Rosales-Olivares LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Reyes-Sánchez AA. Perfil del paciente con síndrome de columna multioperada en el Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación. Análisis comparativo. Cir Cir. 2015; 83: 117-123.

  22. Ellis DJ, Mallozzi SS, Mathews JE, Moss IL, Ouellet JA, Jarzem P, et al. The relationship between preoperative expectations and the short-term postoperative satisfaction and functional outcome in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review. Global Spine Journal. 2015; 5: 436-451.

  23. Machado GC, Rogan E, Maher CG. Managing non-serious low back pain in the emergency department: Time for a change? Emerg Med Australas. 2018; 30: 279-282.

  24. Herrera-Herrera I, Moreno-de-la-Presa R, González-Gutiérrez R, Bárcena-Ruiz E, García-Benassi JM. Evaluación de la columna lumbar posquirúrgica. Radiología. 2013; 55: 12-23.

  25. Rampersaud YR, Canizares M, Perruccio AV, Abraham E, Bailey CS, Christie SD, et al. Fulfillment of patient expectations after spine surgery is critical to patient satisfaction: a cohort study of spine surgery patients. Neurosurgery. 2022; 91: 173-181.

  26. Bechara AHS, Zuiani GR, Risso Neto MÍ, Cavali PTM, Veiga IG, Pasqualini W, et al. Evolution of Oswestry 2.0 questionnaire and the physical component (PCS) of SF-36 during the first postoperative year of lumbar spine fusion in degenerative diseases. Coluna/Columna. 2013; 12: 128-132.

  27. Cano-Rodriguez AI, Gonzalez-Moga A. Evolución clínica de la cirugía descompresión en el tratamiento del canal lumbar estrecho degenerativo. Acta Ortop Mex. 2016; 30: 185-190.

  28. Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021; 398: 78-92.




Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Columna. 2025;3