medigraphic.com
ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

2024, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2024; 26 (3)

Comparative Analysis of the Discrepancy in Conventional Cephalometric Tracing and Digital Cephalometric Tracing with Planmeca Romexis ® Software

Chinchilla TP, Rodríguez PMJ, Chinchilla HR

Language: English
References: 18
Page: 236-243
PDF size: 627.96 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the discrepancy in conventional cephalometric tracing and digital cephalometric tracing in lateral skull radiographs, with 3 angular and 3 linear measurements. We used 24 digital lateral skull radiographs of patients from the Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, taken with the Kodak 8000C Digital Panoramic and Cephalometric System, for the computerized tracing the radiographs were passed directly to the Planmeca Romexis ® software, and the same radiographs were printed for the manual tracing. A comparison between the manual tracing and the Planmeca Romexis ® software measurements showed statistically significant differences (p‹0,05) of 4 measurements between the two systems. It is evident that the cephalometric tracing with the Planmeca Romexis ® software is more reliable than the manual tracing due to the data obtained in this research.


REFERENCES

  1. Balaguer J., Balaguer V., Izquierdo V., Balaguer I. Historia de la Cefalometría. Gaceta Dental. 2009; (201): 104-110.

  2. Proffit W., Fields H., Sarver D. Ortodoncia Contemporánea. 4ta Edicion. España: Editorial ELSEVIER MOSBY; 2008.

  3. Barahona J., Benavides J. Principales análisis cefalométricos utilizados para el diagnóstico ortodóntico. Revista Científica Odontológica. 2006; 2 (1): 11-27.

  4. Companioni A., Rodríguez M., Villegas V., Otaño R. Bosquejo histórico de la cefalometría radiográfica. Revista Cubana Estomatología. 2008; 45 (2): 1561-297x.

  5. Nevárez V. Análisis de la radiografía cefálica lateral para el diagnóstico ortodóntico [PhD Thesis]. Ecuador: Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí; 2018.

  6. Rino J., Batista de Paiva J., Vilanova G., Ferragut M., Miasiro H. Evaluation of radiographic magnification in lateral cephalograms obtained with different X-ray devices: Experimental study in human dry skull. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. 2013; 18 (2): 17.e1-7.

  7. Prakash O. Orthodontics: Diagnosis and Management of Malocclusion and Dentofacial Deformities. 3rd ed. India: ELSEVIER; 2019.

  8. Govindrao A., Anil S. Textbook of Oral Radiology. 2nd ed. India: ELSEVIER; 2008.

  9. Erkan M., Gurel H., Nur M., Demirel B. Reliability of four different computerized cephalometric analysis programs. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2012; (34): 318-321. Doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjr008

  10. Toledo D., Lima M., Bravo M. Estudio comparativo de confiabilidad y precisión entre el método de Trazado Cefalométrico manual con el digital usando el programa Dolphin Imaging con radiografías cefálicas laterales. Revista Latinoamericana de Ortodoncia y Ortopedia. 2014; 2 (28): art-7. Available from https://www.ortodoncia.ws/publicaciones/2014/art-7/

  11. Collins J., Shah A., McCarthy C., Sandler J. Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 132 (6): 830-33.

  12. AlBarakati S., Kula K., Ghoneima A. The reliability and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements: a comparison of conventional and digital methods. Dentomaxillo facial Radioly. 2012; 41 (1): 11-17.

  13. Esteva F., Sánchez A., Meléndez A. Estudio comparativo entre la cefalometría digital y manual con radiografías digitales. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia. 2014; 2 (2): 95-98.

  14. Farooq M., Khan M., Imran S., Sameera A., Qureshi A., Ahmed A., Kumar S., Rahman A. Assessing the Reliability of Digitalized Cephalometric Analysis in Comparison with Manual Cephalometric Analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2016; 10 (10): ZC20-ZC23. Doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17735.8636

  15. Polat-Ozsoy O., Gokcelik A., Toygar U. Differences in cephalometric measurements: A comparison of digital versus hand-tracing methods. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009; 31 (3): 254-259. Doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn121

  16. Naoumova J., Lindman R. A comparison of manual traced images and corresponding scanned radiographs digitally traced. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2009; 31 (3): 247-253. Doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn110

  17. Pellicer Castillo L. Estudio cefalométrico comparativo entre trazados manuales y digitales con programas informáticos [PhD Thesis]. Salamanca, España: Universidad de Salamanca; 2014.

  18. Planmeca. Módulos de Software de Romexis®. Finlandia. Recuperado de: https://www.planmeca.com/




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com