medigraphic.com
ISSN 2225-4676 (Electronic)

2022, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Neurol Neurocir 2022; 12 (1)

Importance of intraoperative monitoring of intracranial pressure during endoscopic ventriculocisternostomy

González OY, Jardines HY, Laffita ZJ, Coronado RA, García TY, Brown PA

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 1-12
PDF size: 408.74 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Neuroendoscopy is a minimally invasive neurosurgical procedure to the brain used for the treatment of an increasing number of diseases. Among its variants, endoscopic ventriculocisternostomy of the floor of the third ventricle is the treatment of choice for triventricular obstructive hydrocephalus.
Objective: To establish the importance of transoperative monitoring of intracranial pressure and other vital parameters during endoscopic ventriculocisternostomy of the floor of the third ventricle.
Case report: We report the case of a 45-year-old patient with obstructive hydrocephalus secondary to a posterior fossa hemangioblastoma. He was treated by premammillary endoscopic ventriculocisternostomy of the floor of the third ventricle with monitoring of intracranial pressure and other vital parameters during the transoperative period. The procedure was carried out with no complications. The patient's symptoms improved and the necessary measurements planned during the procedure could be carried out.
Conclusions: Intraoperative monitoring of intracranial pressure reveals variations in vital parameters such as blood pressure, heart rate, and intermittent increases in intracranial pressure. This type of surgery is very useful for surgeons and anesthesiologists, since it contributes to ruling out and avoiding intraoperative complications and favorably influencing the good results of the procedure and its prognosis, as occurred in this patient.


REFERENCES

  1. Khan MB, Riaz M, Enam SA. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus:Outcome analysis of 120 consecutively treated patients from a developing country. Rev J Surg.

  2. 2016;26:69-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.0012. Mbaye M, Gahito L, Badara Thiam A, Thioub M, Ndiaye E, Faye M, et al. The outcome ofendoscopic third ventriculostomy in a mixed population of adult and pediatric patients. Open JModern Neurosurg. 2020;10(3);325-33. DOI: 10.4236/ojmn.2020.103035

  3. Oertel J, Vulcu S, Eirikele L, Wagner W, Cianalli G, Rediker J. Long term follow-up of repeatendoscopic third ventriculostomy in obstructive hydrocephalus. World Neurosurg.2017;99(3):556-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.072

  4. Demerdash A, Rocque BG, Johnston J, Ruzzelde CJ, Yalcin B, Oskovian R, et al. Endoscopicthird ventriculostomy: A Historical review. BRJ Neurosurg. 2017;31(1);28-32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1245848

  5. Akramovich Sufiaov A, Mkasper E, Albertovich Sufianov R. An optimized technique ofendoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy for children with occlusive hydrocephalus.Neurosurgical Rev. 2018;41(3);851-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0934-9

  6. Gianaris YJ, Nazar R, Brook, Jea G. Failure of ETV in patients with the highest ETV successscores. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20:225231. DOI:10.3340/jkns.2017.0202.013

  7. González Orlandi Y, de Jongh Cobo E, Rojas Manresa JL, Junco Martín R, Córdova ArmengolF, Duboy Limonta V. Aplicación de la neuroendoscopía transcraneal en el tratamiento de pacientesneuroquirúrgicos. Rev. cuban. med. mil. 2013 [acceso 10/04/2021];42(2):164-72. Disponible en:http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.ph?script=sci_arttex&pid=S0138-65572013000200005

  8. Iturri Claveroa F, Honorato C, Ingelmo Ingelmoc I, Fàbregas Juliàd N, Rama-Maceirase P,Valerod R, et al. Consideraciones preoperatorias y manejo neuroanestesiológico intraoperatorio.Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012;59(Supl 1):3-24. DOI: 10.1016/S0034-9356(12)70002-6

  9. Smith DS. Anesthetic management for posterior fossa surgery. En: Cottrell JE, Young MD,editors. Cottrell and Young’s Neuroanesthesia. 5th edición. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2010.p. 203-17.

  10. Drummond JC, Hargens AR, Patel PM. Hydrostatic gradient is important- Blood presureshould be corrected. APSF Newsletter. 2009 [acceso 10/04/2021];24(1):6-10. Disponible en:https://www.apsf.org/article/hydrostatic-gradient-is-important-blood-pressure-should-becorrected/

  11. Gilsanza F, Naviab J, Álvarez J, Monederod P. La especialidad de Anestesiología yReanimación en España: situación actual y retos de futuro. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011;58:1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2016.12.007

  12. Salvador L, Hurtado P, Valero R, Tercero J, Carrero E, Caral L, et al. Importancia de lamonitorización de la presión intracraneal dentro del neuroendoscopio durante el tratamientoanestésico de la cirugía neuroendoscópica. Experiencia en 101 casos. Rev Esp Anestesiol. Reanim.2009;56:75-82. DOI:10.1016/S0034-9356(09)70336-6

  13. Di Rocco F, Grevent D, Drake JM, Boddaert N, Puget S, Roujeau T, et al. Changes inintracranial CSF distribution after ETV. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28:997–1002. DOI:10.1007/s00381-012-1752-6

  14. Dezena RA, Tareq A, Juratli MD, Pires de Aguiar PH, Guerra Davis Reid R, De Oliveira JrJP, et al. Anatomy of the ventricular system. Historical and morphological aspects. Arch PediatricNeurosurg. 2020 [acceso 10/04/2021];2(1):5-11. Disponible en:http://www.archpedneurosurg.com.br/pkp/index.php/sbnped2019/article/view/23

  15. Argañaroz R, Saenz A, Liñorrs JM, Martinez P, Bailez M, Montese B. New simulator forneuroendoscopy: A realistic and attainable model. World neurosurg. 2020;1(3):33-8. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.092

  16. Lin Jian, Guanzhong G, Yanfeng Zhou. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy andventriculoperitoneal shunt for patients with noncomunicating hydrocephalus. Systematic reviewand meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97:42-47. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012139

  17. Soleman J, Guzman R. Neurocognitive Complications after Ventricular Neuroendoscopy: ASystematic Review. Hindawi Beh Neurol. 2020;3(1):10-23. DOI: 10.1155/2020/2536319

  18. Rudrashish H, Sukhminder J. Potential neuroendoscopic complications: an anesthesiologist´sperspective. Asian J neurosurg. 2019;14(3):621-5. DOI: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_37_17

  19. Baby B, Singh R, Suri A, Dhankshiruv RR, Chakva Barty A, Kumars, et al. A review of virtualreality simulators for neuroendoscopy. Neurosurg rev. 2020; 3(5):1255-72. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-019-01164-7

  20. Yadar YR, Bajaj J, Pariharv R, Pateriya A. Practical aspects of neuroendoscpic techniques andcomplications avoidans: A systematic review. Turk neurosurg. 2018;28(3):29-340. DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.18923-16.1




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com