Vilchis CE

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 62-71
PDF size: 193.57 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the quality of professional life of medical personnel in undergraduate and postgraduate training in a second-level care unit of the IMSS Mexico City.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was conducted on undergraduate and postgraduate residents in family medicine, emergency medicine, and internal medicine at the General Hospital of Zone 8 with a Family Medicine Unit of the Mexican Institute of Social Security. The questionnaire used was the Calidad de Vida Profesional 35 (CVP 35).
Results: A total of 141 residents were studied, with a mean age of 26.6 years, a median of 26 years, and a mode of 23 years. The standard deviation was 3.6 years, with a minimum of 22 years and a maximum of 40 years. In the section on CVP instrument 35: quality of professional life, an average of 6.6 points was observed, with a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 10 points. The sections "workload" had an average of 6.9, the section "management support" an average of 4.59 and the section "intrinsic motivation" an average of 6.22.
Conclusions: Physicians-in-training work long hours and have little time for activities other than medicine. Therefore, if we want quality health care and professionals who are willing to give their best, consideration of their own quality of life must play an essential role.

REFERENCES

1. Rodriguez Weber F, Ramírez Arias J. ¿Tenemos claro loque es la residencia medica?” Acta Medica Grupo Ángeles 2016; 14 (3).

2. Rivera-Ávila DA, Rivera-Hermosillo J, González-GalindoC. Validación de los cuestionarios CVP-35 y MBI-HSS paracalidad de vida profesional y burnout en residentes. Inv EdMed 2017; 6 (21): 25-34.

3. Sarmiento PJ, Parra-Chico P. Calidad de vida en médicos enformación de posgrado. Pers bioét 2015;1 9 (2).

4. Dyrbye L, West C, Satele D, Boone S, et al. Burnoutamong U.S. medical students, residents, and early careerphysicians relative to the general U.S. population. AcadMed 2014; 89 (3): 443-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000134

5. Gutiérrez CJ, Cardiel Marmolejo L, Camacho Aguilera J,Mucientes Avellaneda V, et al. Burnout en médicos internosde pregrado del Hospital General de México Dr. EduardoLiceaga. Inv Ed Med 2016; 5 (18): 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2016.01.020

6. Abhary S, Botti M, Dhulia A, et al. Factors impacting healthand well-being and the utilization of supports among Australiandoctors in medical specialty training. BMJ LeaderPublished Online First: 23 December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000227

7. Segura O, Gómez Duque M, Enciso C, Castaneda Porras O.Agotamiento profesional (burnout) en médicos intensivistas:una visión de la unidad de cuidados intensivos desdela teoría fundamentada. Acta Colomb Cuid Intensivo 2016;16 (3): 126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acci.2016.04.003

8. Prieto-Miranda S, Jiménez-Bernardino C, Cázares-RamírezG, Vera-Haro M , et al. Jornadas laborales y sus repercusionesen médicos residentes en un hospital de segundonivel. Med Int Méx 2015; 31: 669-79.

9. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Contrato Colectivode Trabajo 2019-2021. Talleres gGáficos de México, 2018;400-406.

10. Ley Federal del Trabajo. Cámara de Diputados del H.Congreso de la Unión. Secretaría General. Secretaría deServicios Parlamentarios. Nueva Ley Publicada En el DiarioOficial de la Federación. 1º de abril de 1970. ÚltimaReforma Publicada DOF 30-11-2018.

11. Fernández JM. Medición de la capacidad evaluadora delcuestionario CVP-35 para la percepción de la calidad devida profesional. Aten Primaria 2008; 40 (7): 327-36.

12. Albanesi de Nasetta. Percepción de calidad de vidaprofesional en trabajadores de la salud. Alternativas enPsicología, 2013; 28.