medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2025; 39 (3)

Hip prostheses as a treatment for acetabular fractures in the elderly

Capurro-Soler B, Gidi M, Serrano P, Pizarro-Geraldo W, González-von MS, Tey M, León A, Marqués F
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/119906

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/119906
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/119906

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 128-134
PDF size: 321.65 Kb.


Key words:

acetabular fracture, total hip arthroplasty, elderly.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: low-energy acetabular fractures in older adults have significantly increased, with an incidence up to 2.4 times higher over the last three decades. While osteosynthesis is the standard treatment in young patients, its suitability for older adults is debated due to higher risks of complications and reinterventions. These risks are exacerbated by osteoporosis, comminution, and articular surface damage, such as femoral head impaction and preexisting conditions like coxarthrosis. The literature suggests that total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be more appropriate in cases of severe displacement, articular comminution, acetabular impaction in the load zone, and other complex scenarios. Material and methods: this retrospective study analyzed patients over 65 years with acetabular fractures treated with THA between 2008 and 2018, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Parameters evaluated included fracture type, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, use of traction, time to surgery, type of implant, and complications. Clinical evaluations utilized the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (MAP) scale, and statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 18.0. Results: seven patients were included, with a mean age of 76.4 years. The most common fracture was anterior column with associated posterior hemi-transverse. The most used implant was the uncemented tantalum revision acetabulum. The mean follow-up period was 7.8 years, with an average MAP score of 16.6 at one year. No intraoperative complications occurred, and radiographic consolidation was observed in all cases at three months. Conclusions: THA showed good clinical outcomes in older adults with acetabular fractures, without increasing the risk of complications, and demonstrated high long-term survival.


REFERENCES

  1. Ferguson TA, Patel R, Bhandari M. Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: An epidemiological and radiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92(2): 250-7.

  2. Park KC, Oh CW, Kim JW, Oh HK, Shon HC, Kim JJ, et al. Acetabular fractures in elderly. J Orthop Sci. 2023; 28(2): 376-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.12.004.

  3. Manson T, Schmidt AH. Acetabular fractures in the elderly: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2016; 4(10): e1. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.15.00090.

  4. Boraiah S, Ragsdale M, Achor T, Zelicof S, Asprinio DE. Open reduction internal fixation and primary total hip arthroplasty of selected acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2009; 23(4): 243-8. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181923fb8.

  5. Butterwick D, Papp S, Gofton W, Liew A, Beaulé PE. Acetabular fractures in the elderly: evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(9): 758-68.

  6. Li YL, Tang YY. Displaced acetabular fractures in the elderly: results after open reduction and internal fixation. Injury. 2014; 45(12): 1908-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.09.004.

  7. Stibolt RD Jr, Patel HA, Huntley SR, Lehtonen EJ, Shah AB, Naranje SM. Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis following acetabular fracture: A systematic review of characteristics, outcomes, and complications. Chin J Traumatol. 2018; 21(3): 176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.02.004.

  8. Carroll EA, Huber FG, Goldman AT, Virkus WW, Pagenkop E, Lorich DG. Treatment of acetabular fractures in an older population. J OrthopTrauma. 2010; 24(10): 637-44.

  9. Simko P, Braunsteiner T, Vajcziková S. Early primary total hip arthroplasty for acetabular fractures in elderly patients. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006; 73(4): 275-82.

  10. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM. Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(17): 1559-67.

  11. Clarke-Jenssen J, Roise O, Storeggen SAO, Madsen JE. Long-term survival and risk factors for failure of the native hip joint after operatively treated displaced acetabular fractures. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-B(6): 834-840. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B6.BJJ-2016-1013.R1.

  12. Tornetta P. Displaced acetabular fractures: indications for operative and nonoperative management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2001; 9(1): 18-28.

  13. Alpaydin E, Erem M, Copuroglu C. Comparison of the functional and radiological results of the conservatively and surgically treated displaced acetabulum fractured patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022; 28(8): 1170-9. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.00310.

  14. Saterbak AM, Marsh JL, Turbett T, Brandser E. Acetabular fractures classification of Letournel and Judet--a systematic approach. Iowa Orthop J. 1995; 15: 184-96.

  15. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, Matta JM. Letournel classification for acetabular fractures. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(9): 1704-9.

  16. Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; (151): 81-106.

  17. Enocson A, Blomfeldt R. Acetabular fractures in the elderly treated with a primary Burch-Schneider reinforcement ring, autologous bone graft, and a total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a 4-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(6): 330-7.

  18. Tidermark J, Blomfeldt R, Ponzer S, Soderqvist A, Tornkvist H. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and autologous bone grafting for acetabular fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2003; 17(3): 193-7.

  19. Ugino FK, Righetti CM, Alves DP, Guimarães RP, Honda EK, Ono NK. Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Method. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012; 20(4): 213-7. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000400004.

  20. De Bellis UG, Legnani C, Calori GM. Acute total hip replacement for acetabular fractures: a systematic review of the literature. Injury. 2014; 45(2): 356-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.018.

  21. Capone A, Peri M, Mastio M. Surgical treatment of acetabular fractures in the elderly: a systematic review of the results. EFORT Open Rev. 2017; 2(4): 97-103. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160036.

  22. Giustra F, Cacciola G, Pirato F, Bosco F, De Martino I, Sabatini L, et al. Indications, complications, and clinical outcomes of fixation and acute total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of acetabular fractures: A systematic review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34(1): 47-57. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03701-z.

  23. Agbley DYD, Holdbrook-Smith HA, Ahonon Y. A comparative evaluation of the efficacy between skeletal traction and skin traction in pre-operative management of femur shaft fractures in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital. Ghana Med J. 2020; 54(3): 146-50. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v54i3.4.

  24. Liang K, Gani MH, Griffin X, Culpan P, Mukabeta T, Bates P. Acute versus delayed total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33(7): 2683-93. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03489-y.

  25. Lindberg-Larsen M, Petersen PB, Jorgensen CC, Overgaard S, Kehlet H; Lundbeck Foundation Center for Fast-track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Collaborating Group. Postoperative 30-day complications after cemented/hybrid versus cementless total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients > 70 years. Acta Orthop. 2020; 91(3): 286-92. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1745420.

  26. Khurana S, Nobel TB, Merkow JS, Walsh M, Egol KA. Total hip arthroplasty for posttraumatic osteoarthritis of the hip fares worse than THA for primary osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015; 44(7): 321-5.

  27. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(6): 868-76. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200106000-00008.

  28. Makridis KG, Obakponovwe O, Bobak P, Giannoudis PV. Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture: incidence of complications, reoperation rates and functional outcomes: evidence today. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(10): 1983-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.001.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

III




Figure 1
Figure 2
Table 1
Table 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2025 May-Jun;39