medigraphic.com
ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología

2025, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2025; 39 (3)

Total hip arthroplasty in patients with digestive ostomies: evaluation and long-term outcomes

Capurro-Soler B, Muñoz-Mahamud E, Badillo-Pérez E, González-von MS, Alias A, Morata L, Fernández-Valencia J

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 135-138
PDF size: 220.41 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the relationship between digestive ostomies and the risk of prosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is not well-established. This study aimed to assess prosthesis survival, clinical outcomes, and infectious complications in patients with a digestive ostomy undergoing THA. Material and methods: a single-center, retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients with digestive ostomies who underwent THA between 2005 and 2018, with at least one year of follow-up. Data collected included the site and type of ostomy, underlying disease, type of THA, clinical outcomes measured by the Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (MAP) Score, postoperative infections, and the need for revision surgery. Results: seven patients with a mean age of 63 years (range 45-80) and a mean follow-up of 10.1 years were included. The most common cause of the ostomy was colon cancer. The average MAP Score one year postoperatively was 17.1. There were no postoperative complications or infections. Conclusions: the study concludes that THA in patients with digestive ostomies results in favorable clinical outcomes and does not increase the risk of periprosthetic joint infections.


REFERENCES

  1. Ares O, Arnold WV, Atilla B, Kumar Bari A, Battenberg A, Belzino M, et al. General assembly, prevention, host related local: proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(2S): S3-S12.

  2. Salvadalena G. Incidence of complications of the stoma and peristomal skin among individuals with colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2008; 35(6): 596-607.

  3. Tortolani PJ, Kaufman HS, Nahabedian MY, Frassica FJ. Pericapsular fistula of the hip after radiation therapy and resection of a rectal carcinoma. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(11): 1596e9.

  4. Long SS, Tawa NE, Ayres DK, Abdeen A, Wu JS. Coloarticular fistula: a rare complication of revision total hip arthroplasty. Radiol Case Rep. 2011; 6(3): 533.

  5. El-Daly I, Natarajan B, Rajakulendran K, Symons S. Colo-articular fistula following a Girdlestone resection arthroplasty. J Surg Case Rep. 2014;2014 (5): rju043.

  6. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. "Modes of failure of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening". Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 141: 17-27.

  7. Pruzansky JS, Bronson MJ, Grelsamer RP, Strauss E, Moucha CS. Prevalence of modifiable surgical site infection risk factors in hip and knee joint arthroplasty patients at an urban academic hospital. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(2): 272-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.019.

  8. Bozic KJ, Lau E, Kurtz S, Ong K, Rubash H, Vail TP, et al. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection and postoperative mortality following total hip arthroplasty in Medicare patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(9): 794-800. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00072.

  9. Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Beswick AD. Patient-related risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016; 11(3): e0150866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150866.

  10. Wu C, Qu X, Liu F, Li H, Mao Y, Zhu Z. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in Chinese patients. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e95300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095300.

  11. Guo H, Xu C, Chen J. Risk factors for periprosthetic joint infection after primary artificial hip and knee joint replacements. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020; 14(6): 565-71. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11013.

  12. Kenneally H, Brown N, Schmitt D. Outcomes of total joint arthroplasty subsequent to ostomy: a case series. Arthroplast Today. 2023; 24: 101220. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101220.

  13. Dockery DM, Allu S, Glasser J, Antoci V, Born CT, Garcia DR. Comparison of periprosthetic joint infection rates in the direct anterior approach and non-anterior approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int. 2023; 33(4): 633-9. doi: 10.1177/11207000221129216.

  14. Ugino FK, Righetti CM, Alves DP, Guimaraes RP, Honda EK, Ono NK. Evaluation of the reliability of the modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel method. Acta Ortop Bras. 2012; 20(4): 213-7. doi: 10.1590/S1413-78522012000400004.



EVIDENCE LEVEL

II




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com