Bolivar PHC

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 11-14
PDF size: 182.66 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: orofacial fissures comprise one of the most prevalent malformations worldwide. They can have different morphology and extension along the palate, lip and nasal cavity, so their treatment can vary from the sole management of soft tissues to the management of hard tissues in different interventions or phases over time. Thus, in the management of hard tissues, the use of bone grafts may be necessary to facilitate the comprehensive rehabilitation of the patient and the impact on it, from every point of view is less. Objective: to analyze the different types of bone graft for the surgical management of lip palatine alveolus cleft. Material and methods: it consists of a literature review study, where an electronic search was used using keywords such as cleft lip and palate, cleft palate, bone graft, autologous graft, in the search engines, PubMed, Cochrane, SciELO and Google Scholar, the inclusion criterion was complete articles from the last five years. Results: in the literature it is reported that depending on the extent and type of cleft palate, its surgical treatment is defined, and that if the placement of a bone graft is necessary (many are used), the one with the best prognosis being autograft. Conclusions: the autologous graft is the most widely used and most effective in the surgical treatment of cleft palates, especially when there is alveolar compromise, since tissue regeneration is much more viable.

REFERENCES

1. Babai A, Irving M. Orofacial clefts: genetics of cleft lip and palate. Genes (Basel). 2023; 14 (8): 1603. doi: 10.3390/genes14081603.

2. Yusof MS, Mohd Ibrahim H. The impact of cleft lip and palate on the quality of life of young children: a scoping review. Med J Malaysia. 2023; 78 (2): 250-258.

3. Darjazini Nahas L, Hmadieh M, Audeh M, Yousfan A, Almasri IA, Martini N. Cleft lip and palate risk factors among otorhinolaryngology: Head and neck surgery patients in two hospitals. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102 (42): e34419. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034419.

4. Sigler A. Protocolo para la planificación quirúrgica en las clínicas de labio y paladar hendidos en la zona noroeste de la República Mexicana. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2017; 43 (3): 313-325. doi: 10.4321/s0376-78922017000400013 Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922017000400313&lng=es

5. Nascimento MLBD, Trindade-Suedam IK, Loureiro NB, Marzano-Rodrigues MN, Siqueira MCG, Albertassi THDSA, et al. Evaluation of the impact of alveolar bone graft surgery on the nasal cavity of individuals with cleft lip and palate. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024; 32: e20240212. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0212.

6. Putri IL, Fabian P, Wungu CDK. A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients. Tzu Chi Med J. 2024; 36 (1): 53-58. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23.

7. Díaz F, Gorrín D, Villalobos M, Sosa D, García H, Albornoz E et al. Injerto autólogo en bloque de mentón, una alternativa para reconstruir rebordes alveolares atróficos en implantología. Lat Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 3 (1): 7-11. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/111853

8. Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Ratnayake J. Bone grafts and substitutes in dentistry: a review of current trends and developments. Molecules. 2021; 26 (10): 3007. doi: 10.3390/molecules26103007.

9. Miron RJ. Optimized bone grafting. Periodontol 2000. 2024; 94 (1): 143-160. doi: 10.1111/prd.12517.

10. Panahipour L, Abbasabadi AO, Wagner A, Kratochwill K, Pichler M, Gruber R. Bone allograft acid lysates change the genetic signature of gingival fibroblasts. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24 (22): 16181. doi: 10.3390/ijms242216181.

11. Schlundt C, Fischer H, Bucher CH, Rendenbach C, Duda GN, Schmidt-Bleek K. The multifaceted roles of macrophages in bone regeneration: a story of polarization, activation and time. Acta Biomater. 2021; 133: 46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.052.

12. Shabaan AA, Salahuddin A, Aboulmagd I, Ragab R, Salah KA, Rashid A, et al. Alveolar cleft reconstruction using bone marrow aspirate concentrate and iliac cancellous bone: a 12-month randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27 (11): 6667-6675. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05276-9.

13. Ferguson MA, Akyalcin S, Campos H, Gliksten A, Hargett K, Yang S, et al. Evaluation of dental root development regarding maxillary canine eruption status after secondary alveolar bone grafting in patients with cleft lip and palate. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13 (9): 1642. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13091642.

14. Strujak G, Marlière DAA, de Lima Medeiros Y, Carlini JL, de Lima AAS. Radiographic assessment of different autogenous bone grafts in the alveolar cleft: a retrospective longitudinal study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023; 22 (4): 938-945. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01981-w.

15. Vemagiri CT, Damera S, Pamidi VRC, Pampana SG. Management of alveolar cleft defect by iliac crest secondary bone grafting: a case report. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022; 15 (4): 472-474. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2405.

16. Attar BM, Soltani P, Davari D, Mehdizadeh M. Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 48 (2): 85-93. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.85.

17. Ferreira CF, Carlini JL, Magini RS, Gil JN, Zétola AL. Allogeneic bone application in association with platelet-rich plasma for alveolar bone grafting of cleft palate defects. Contemp Clin Dent. 2021; 12 (2): 143-149. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_342_20.

18. Van Stein Callenfels DME, Bos A, Jonkman REG. Maxillary arch dimensions in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate receiving alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024; 61 (11): 1873-1878. doi: 10.1177/10556656231188283.