medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología

ISSN 3061-8142 (Electronic)
ISSN 0484-7903 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2025, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Mex Anest 2025; 48 (3)

Implementation of CALS and simulation-based training in the postoperative cardiac surgery patient: experience, evidence, and challenges

Herrera-Elizalde RE, Núñez-Trejo PJ, Molina-Torres MC
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/120428

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/120428
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/120428

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 193-196
PDF size: 1110.29 Kb.


Key words:

postoperative cardiac arrest, CALS, simulation-based training, cardiac surgery, failure to rescue.

ABSTRACT

Cardiac arrest (CA) in the postoperative period after cardiac surgery requires a different approach to conventional Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), given the presence of tamponade, intrathoracic bleeding or epicardial pacemaker failure. The CALS/CSU-ALS program proposes specific maneuvers, such as triple shock in VF/VT, cautious use of adrenaline and emergent resternotomy before five minutes. In this context, Simulanest has proven to be a fundamental pillar for training, offering high-fidelity simulation scenarios that enhance the technical competencies and emotional regulation of the team in the face of these crises. This reinforces situational awareness and the execution of standardized protocols. Recent studies reveal that CSU-ALS certification reduces mortality (FTR-CA) in centers adopting this approach, thanks to rapid detection of mechanical causes and timely surgical intervention. Looking ahead, the integration of echocardiography and circulatory support (ECMO) will further consolidate the efficacy of CALS in the cardiac postoperative period.


REFERENCES

  1. Lott C, Truhlár A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, González-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021;161:152-219.

  2. Dunning J, Nandi J, Ariffin S, Jerstice J, Danitsch D, Levine A. The Cardiac Surgery Advanced Life Support Course (CALS): delivering significant improvements in emergency cardiothoracic care. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1767-1772.

  3. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Task Force on Resuscitation After Cardiac Surgery. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons expert consensus for the resuscitation of patients who arrest after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1005-1020.

  4. Ley SJ. Standards for resuscitation after cardiac surgery. Crit Care Nurse. 2015;35:30-37.

  5. Carpenter M. Resuscitation after successful resuscitation in cardiac surgery patients. Resuscitation. 2023;8:1-8.

  6. Gu Y, Panda K, Spelde A, Jelly CA, Crowley J, Gutsche J, et al. Modernization of cardiac advanced life support: role and value of cardiothoracic anesthesiologist intensivist in post-cardiac surgery arrest resuscitation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024;38:3005-3017.

  7. LaPar DJ, Ghanta RK, Kern JA, Crosby IK, Rich JB, Speir AM, et al. Hospital variation in mortality from cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery: an opportunity for improvement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:534-539; discussion 539-540.

  8. Weber MP, Strobel RJ, Norman AV, Kareddy A, Young A, Young S, et al. Cardiac Surgical Unit-Advanced Life Support-certified centers are associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024:S0022-5223(24)00698-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.08.014.

  9. Yadava OP, Levine AJ. CSU-ALS protocol for cardiac arrest (interview). Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;37:471-472.




Figure 1
Figure 2

2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Anest. 2025;48